Jump to content
Ripper

Global War Peace Terms - Discussion

Recommended Posts

So, IQ wins eh? 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, so... is this the end to the war as to what I'm reading?

Edited by Madden8021

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Madden8021 said:

Hmm, so... is this the end to the war as to what I'm reading?

No, it's a discussion thread for the peace terms that have already been presented.

The war is still ongoing, as the terms have not been accepted.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Thalmor said:

No, it's a discussion thread for the peace terms that have already been presented.

The war is still ongoing, as the terms have not been accepted.

Ah, making sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Cypher said:

While I'm not a fan of the joke terms in Article 3, the rest of the terms seen fair.

Well if you tried to force any actually meaningful terms on them they'd opt to just burn the tens of billions of cash and resources fighting this forever instead.

At least this way its mildly amusing.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Lucifer Morningstar said:

Cough cough, where's BC?

who's BC?

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Way too wordy.

Waaay too many terms.

I sure as hell wouldn’t accept it till it was trimmed down to something more manageable.

EDIT:

Looking through these more closely, the only ones that I like are the AoD, Color Bloc, and War Dodgers.

The rest is just too much.  The Arrgh one seems odd.  It’s allowing Arrgh the initiative to raid TKR, and TKR can only reply once a hit happens.  Should just push for a blanket NAP there.

Fairness in Trading is a odd demand too.

Public Statements, while lulzy, that’s a lot there to pay attention too.

 

Edited by Buorhann
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Cypher said:

While I'm not a fan of the joke terms in Article 3, the rest of the terms seen fair.

So what you're telling me, is that you don't know why kids love the taste of cinnamon toast crunch? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Truthfully, I’ve never been a fan of joke terms. I’d rather levy terms that have actual in-game meaning or consequences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Agent W said:

Truthfully, I’ve never been a fan of joke terms. I’d rather levy terms that have actual in-game meaning or consequences.

As I said, you can't, they'd just keep fighting forever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.