Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Smith last won the day on June 27 2019

Smith had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

3047 Mythical Upvote Hero


About Smith

  • Rank
    The New and Improved Pigeon

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Alliance Pip
    The Knights Radiant
  • Leader Name
  • Nation Name
    The Land of Simple
  • Nation ID
  • Alliance Name
    The Knights Radiant

Recent Profile Visitors

8083 profile views
  1. πŸ€” πŸ€” πŸ€” πŸ€” πŸ€” πŸ€”
  2. πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”
  3. Weird normally IQ only tries lobbying admins/mods in DMs
  4. >Form AA and almost immediately join in on a massive dogpile >Complain about bandwagoning when the fight becomes more even Oh the horror
  5. Hamster guy: It doesn't matter what people think of us Also hamster guy: I will literally never stop arguing or admit I may have made a mistake somewhere
  6. You realize I can just post logs showing you are lying right? Early November here is NPO amongst others discussing how to stall peace talks: underlordgc11/3/2019, 7:55:58 AM Anyways, I can give a link to kertogibdvsujs to join the peace server underlordgc11/3/2019, 7:56:43 AM And we can just stall them by saying we want people to get organized or some random bs like that ### TheNG11/1/2019, 4:46:18 PM I mean there’s plenty of ways to slow down talks TheNG11/1/2019, 4:46:29 PM We have reps demands in our back pocket TheNG11/1/2019, 4:46:40 PM The various humiliating joke terms ### Leo the Great11/1/2019, 6:01:53 PM I don’t think the discussion was about about actually finding peace Leo the Great11/1/2019, 6:02:08 PM Rather two different ways of prolonging it till they are dead Roquentin11/1/2019, 6:02:17 PM ah Roquentin11/1/2019, 6:02:26 PM well the not including thme is a goood stlal tactic Leo the Great11/1/2019, 6:02:33 PM Drag peace talks vs insist on separating them Roquentin11/1/2019, 6:02:44 PM separate talks for anyone not kertchogg proper --- A couple weeks later here is NPO amongst others blaming us for peace talks not going fast after planning to make them slow: They even made the argument that they were trying to increase the speed of peace talks while secretly planning to do the opposite
  7. Yes there were more October logs as we were only halfway into November when this thread was made, but the logs continue into November showing their intent. However, it kinda seems like no matter what answer we give you or how much evidence we provide you there doesn't seem to be a scenario in which you would accept that the blame lies with your leadership. Am I wrong on this? Because I've pointed out multiple misconceptions that you have had and you seem to just move the goal post. If we prove that they were still doing things in November then you say that you thought it was mostly happening in October. If we show it's not from a third party you say the person is untrustworthy. Then you say we must have paid or promised them something. We are providing tons of evidence for our claims while you make assumptions such as this with no proof whatsoever. Why is that?
  8. The "third party" was a member of your coalition leadership which actually makes him a first party as he was directly involved. It is not "may or may not" as they directly say they don't want the war to end. We know their views did not change after October because we have logs in November which is when this thread was created showing they were still trying to stall peace. And again, while they were doing this in private they were publicly blaming us for peace not progressing.
  9. The logs were necessary because your coalition's leadership was publicly blaming us for no progress being made in peace talks while in private were strategizing on how to drag out the peace process for as long as possible to make as many people quit out of boredom on our side as they could. It's not acceptable to gaslight somebody and expect them to just sit back and take the abuse. The blame here is on your leadership for developing a strategy specifically designed to pressure people out of the game. It's not on us for to standing up to people telling intentional lies. This war has been going on for like 7 months, there is no reason for anybody to believe that your coalition leadership was going to change their tactics when they were still lying about what they were doing. Keep in mind that during the period that you are saying we should have still been trying to negotiate they were still trying to think of ways to drag the war out. The only option we had left when shown that your leadership was trying to delay talks to get everybody to quit was at least show what they were saying isn't true.
  10. No coalition has ever held people at war for 7 months and expressed excitement over people quitting before. I'm not sure what you would expect to see in our coalition channel since we aren't in a position to do what your side has been doing and when we were in that position in past wars we didn't do it
  11. It is probably better for you not to say anything when you know logs will probably come out later contradicting it heh
  12. It's possible for two people to be in the wrong you know? Gorge should not have posted that and he has since apologized, admitted he was wrong, and removed it. You however are continuing to look for excuses to minimize this mercy board crap. The fact that somebody else did something wrong does not excuse what GOONS is doing is wrong.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.