Thalmor

Can't believe Arrgh can do this. Somebody needs to stop them.....

We're evil

dats how it B on tis BIT.CH called orbis

Rose badman

It's a generic error message.

Lame. Gay. Go on the offense. Nobody will be compelled or swayed by a "complete rejection" of ideas with no "attack" involved. You need passion to get people on board! "We condemn high taxation. We understand nations have a right to their income. Those who seek to take most of your income are evil and we stand against them. Join us in the fight for freedom!" See? Much more sexy. I never want to see mealy-mouthed bullshit from you ever again.

Using missiles and nukes to damage the cities of enemy alliances, while one is on the losing side of an alliance war, is one of the only ways to effectively fight back if you're outnumbered and outgunned. This game doesn't need the few strats there are to be nerfed. The war system needs a complete overhaul first, for such an idea to be considered. There is no compelling reason to nerf missiles and nukes. Any argument presented is just pixelhugger cope.

If these claims are true, evidence should be provided. Can screenshots be provided of such misconduct?

Hey Buorhann! 2 things real quick: As your war ally against TRF. I completely agree they deserved it. That war contributed to that community crumbling to dust, and the game was better off for it. My only regret was that we didn't roll them longer. Second, I believe Panky was saying that the next offensive war TGH is involved in should have either completely even numbers or be at a disadvantage. I think your analysis of this war as a dogpile is incorrect. Perhaps you can clarify on your definition, though?

My morale has been depleted, and I'm ready to surrender.

Is it a problem for someone to have a large warchest from which to declare and fight wars with?

I think this is an excellent point. Nuke turrenting is a legitimate and fun playstyle. There's only loss if it's somehow made significantly harder to execute on. We need more features and playstyles, not less.

Nuke turreting is one of the few effective ways for the losing side of a war to fight back after the conventional war has been lost (which can occur as soon as the opening blitz is launched). I don't really think it should be altered unless there's some very comprehensive updates to how wars are fought overall. Like how fighting conventionally is a skill, nuke turreting is a skill, and countering nuke turrets is a skill. In this already very limited game, we don't need any of the few playstyles to be patched out. I really liked @Who Me's suggestion of making ships have an anti-plane combat value, or some kind of change to spies overall. I think those are much better places to start.

Terminal Lucidity

THE FORUMS HAVE BEEN RESURRECTED, BUT AT WHAT COST????