Leaderboard

Sorry, posting this all from my phone. Frontier Records has spoken with the forces of Ketog/Chaos, and Frontier Records, along with The Fighting Pacifists, Kazoku, and Code of Honor hereby withdrawal from the ongoing conflict. FR, TFP, Kazoku, and CoH, will remain neutral for the remainder of the conflict. We wish our friends and allies the best of luck, and a speedy end to the conflict.

>nebulous wording He said, omitting the details of the greater overall conversation that took place surrounding the decision and my clearly expressed intent to keep the war limited on our part and the effort I put into building a legitimate consensus on the expressed goal: which at the time was a strike at the upper tier consolidation. >tacit approval That implies tacit responsibility. If you had expressed your waffling conviction and conflicts of interest to me before I was committed to the war effort I would've never declared in the first place. I told you straight up it would be suicide if you declared. So don't act like your ass is all chapped now because I wasn't straight with you from the onset. I'm not the one who had to be so nebulous and vague about my goals that I can only refer to my commitment as "tacit approval" to maintain a shred of integrity.

We did it boys, our first Global Conflict. Our objective has been complete, we received a lot of damage but also fought hard and proud. Now it's time for our boys to head back, to see their families and friends once more. We remember those who died fighting to protect our alliances' pride and dignity. We thank our combatants for bringing a good fight, Arrgh especially. I propose a toast to a great future of Orbis as we, Golden Phoenix Coalition, finally pull out of the conflict. Terms of Departure 1. Golden Phoenix Coalition shall not reenter the war, under any circumstances Welcome home boys

Elite Democratic Republic has pulled out of the war kf KETOG and Chaos vs IQ and agree to the following terms 1.) No aiding Coalition B and/or future entries 2.) No further aggression

Well since @MinesomeMC decided to bring back P&W Balls, in an attempt to earn a profit on it. We here at Arrgh shouldn't let him flex all over us like that, atleast without us gething a piece of the cake. So here is the frist, of hopefully several comics: Comic 1: Arrgh! recruitment poster

All this micro talk made them think of it

If you're going to put my name out on the forums, at least make sure you do it without going through the spin cycle first. Let's start with the actual signing of Zodiac. It was very clear that they only intended to sign us to throw us into the war on your side. That was made evident when, the day after we proposed the treaty, they asked us to hit Mensa in an offensive strike. Our logic at the time was that we'll end up in that war anyways so we might as well enter on the offensive front and likely be supported by IQ. Our blitz on Mensa partnered with Zodiac was more than enough to keep them tied down until TKR entered against us 130 vs 35 with more than enough capabilities to cover our entire tiering at that point. When SK was drowning and we asked for help, all we got was "VE has wars with TKR too". Since both of us were getting pubstomped with no real plan to handle TKR and, by extension, bail us out, we decided to exit the war after a month of waiting for a real plan. During my radio interview with Thalmor, I remember Seeker confronting me about our early exit and being upset that we weren't dedicated to the war. I very clearly explained to Seeker that we weren't dedicated to a war in which we received no support. What we were supposed to do? Meat shield for a bunch of alliances who had no intentions helping us? Meat shield for alliances that we had no interest in garnering political capitol with and that we owed nothing to? I very distinctly remember the circle jerks in that server and, by god, it was the last thing I ever wanted to be apart of. So yes, maybe I was a little upset with the IQ coalition during that radio show but I think our actions were entirely justified due to the piss poor handling of that war by IQ and our lack of desire to help you push your agenda. To claim that we cancelled Zodiac just to plot against you for your criticism is a little too flattering for both of you. Nor was that the rationale behind lying to Polaris, which admittedly isn't my greatest move. However, we plotted against IQ because your consolidation was in no way healthy for the game, amassing the entire active lower tier and encroaching your way into the middle tier was nothing more than a choke hold. As an alliance leader, my ultimate goal is to ensure the health of this game remains dynamic and interesting for all players, not just for my own community. This seems to be lost on many alliance leaders, who look to "win" the game. This cementing of power is absolutely atrocious and will lead to nothing but a dead game. What happens when you do win, when you become untouchable, when you police the game to ensure that your alliance stays? Activity dies, players give up but, hey - at least you're number one right? Number one in a game where no one remains active due to your actions? Sounds amazing. These most recent actions by NPO have done nothing but re-solidify my beliefs that not only are you out here for your personal gain but that you truly don't care about the consequences of your actions. Good luck with creating your future hegemony.

Wait aren't you the guy who VMd after losing his first war?

Are you trying to though? Because it has been pointed out to you numerous times by now but it can be repeated again: NPO has presetend a CB (basically two CBs) that are lacking a lot. One based on people apparently not hitting the right tone for you to not be freaked out based on what I read on the past three pages. Which is a worse CB than anything else I've ever seen here. The other one being logs about people making theoretical assumptions about what might possibly could happen in the future if IQ were not to disband. IQ is supposed to have disbanded though so these logs shouldn't even bother you anymore because they're not related to you anymore. People believed BK and NPO had split after all. Furthermore, a lot of your government members continously speak about further logs that they are not willing to present though from a source that is "100% legit" because it's not somebody who'd try to make something up about TKR. And on TOP of that we also constantly get people like Keshav who claim there have been private messages that have been deleted now that totally showed that people wanted to hit NPO. And then we don't want to forget the ridiculous conspiracy theory pushed by people like Auctor that our war against KETOG was a fake one. If Adrienne had faked a war with an opponent a lot of people from us have rather negative feelings towards to (for the reasons we all already know) and in which we got such a beating, then I guarantee you that I'd be gone from TKR's government and TKR very soon and so would be probably a decent number of other people. And then when people don't want to engage in all of this anymore, because it all sounds made up and is made up, then they argue "Oh, alliance XYZ has gone suspiciously silent. Why won't they argue with my lies and conspiracies anymore?" So that's not an engagement in good faith. It's intervening into an existing conflict on a side of an alliance you said you had split from. Based on a CB that everyone who gives it a second or two of thought would recognize as lacking an actual CB. Then supported by continous claims by members about logs that they can't actually present or don't want to present. So your intervention is based on what people rightfully perceive to be a pretty lousy pretext and NPO's response can hardly be considered an engagement in good faith.

There are a lot of WoT so let me help you all with a tl;dr

On the first day of Dial Up the enemy countered me, with one nation on-ly. On the second day of Dial Up the enemy countered me, with two micro alliances and one nation only. On the third day of Dial Up the enemy countered me, with three protectorates, two micro alliances, and one nation only On the fourth day of Dial Up the enemy countered me, with four groundless nations, three protectorates, two micro alliances, and one nation only On the fifth day of Dial Up the enemy countered me, with five dozen meatshields, four groundless nations, three protectorates, two micro alliances, and one nation only On the sixth day of Dial Up the enemy countered me, with six chaining treaties, five dozen meatshields, four groundless nations, three protectorates, two micro alliances, and one nation only On the seventh day of Dial Up the enemy countered me, with seven "former" allies, six chaining treaties, five dozen meatshields, four groundless nations, three protectorates, two micro alliances, and one nation only On the eighth day of Dial Up the enemy countered me, with eight NPO Roq-bots, seven "former" allies, six chaining treaties, five dozen meatshields, four groundless nations, three protectorates, two micro alliances, and one nation only ~fin~

HELLO!!! Orbis I am the leader of the Coal Mines The Coal King Nokia Rokia First of all I wanted to say we exist and we hope to become good friends with all of you To be continued Feel free to join our discord we got an active VC and it's fun to get to know people https://discord.gg/B4V2XuJ

Rose only started building after the leaks. Prior to this Rose had standard MMR levels, which was evident to anyone with a militarization tracker. Remember Rose MMR allows them to double buy to nearly max mil, which is kind of the point, it makes rapid militarization like in the 3-4 days between leak and attack possible. Rose also has no paperless ties to either of the spheres. They entered because it is Rose FA policy to find what BK did, that is planning to attack smaller spheres with nearly 4:1 odds and asking the other large sphere to cover them, unacceptable behavior that is absolutely a threat to them, as the smallest sphere. You understand untreatied alliances can enter wars with each other and NOT have paperless treaties, right? I actually quite appreciated when talking to Mhearl months ago about minispheres that Rose's opinion was that it could join neither side without tipping the scales, and so stayed to itself in it's tiny 'sphere' if you could call it that at all. The same reason it broke with t$ when they signed NPO is why Rose never drifted to Chaos or KETOG. It's a moral stand that meant the only people who'd attack are... The people they're fighting now. That's also why Citadels paranoia that KETOG would trip over itself to hit them is a bit ridiculous. I'd actually argue you'd be less likely to get hit in the short term for doing it, because it's a move they'd respect enough to let take hold. Your biggest threat would be people who don't respect that as much and even view it as a laughably easy opportunity, such as BK. Even then your previously friendly relations as a Bloc with them would likely keep you pretty safe from that too, short to mid term. Infact, the biggest threat of all to an independent Citadel would be you, Elijiah. You're rather antagonistic, which isn't necessarily a bad thing. But it does make people want to roll you, and would be the greatest incentivizing force for short term considerations of attacking an independent Citadel.

Believe it or not, our side is made up of multiple people who each hold their own opinions. I know it's hard for an NPO member to grasp this, but please just trust me on this.

No, I don't think my mother 3000 miles away is much support, but nice try you angry little pleb. ?

Micros are vital for pnws survival

Let me stop you right here, no, you weren’t. You (and Syndicate) had a chance to prove all your critics and doubters wrong. You both failed at it. Possibly from apathy or possibly from the fact that critics, like myself, were right from the beginning. Who knows. The only difference is that Syndicate sort of saved face by honoring the word they gave and stopping once their ally (You) no longer honored it. All you showed is that you’re more aligned with BK than giving it a shot with Syndicate and House Stark. Going so far to use logs that pre-dated IQ’s supposed disbanding to justify your hit. The ONLY group that may have possibly came after NPO (And Syndicate) would be KETOG due to the opportunistic hit on Guardian/Grumpy. Instead, you folks are literally pulling exactly what you’ve criticized TKR (and others) for over the past year. I can guarantee you that many of the leaders on the other side of the web here were willing to give you a chance. The only alliance that many doubted (and rightfully so) was BK. It wasn’t NPO, GoG, UPN, or whoever else. Had any of you actually got over your paranoia and explored out, you’d see there would be some interests out there. And you, of all leaders over there, should know this.

We went in to defend FR since FR invoked the ODP. I wonder what's so difficult to digest about an alliance actually honouring it's treaty obligations rather than dropping their protectors when being hit hard and stuff like that.

What is it with posters tonight and my penis

I just got my prostate exam from there. My doctor was so good he did it with his hands on my shoulders.

I mean, if you want to ignore numbers for quality, we're right back to the old claims that syndisphere/EMC were consolidating the 'good players'. Personally, I find good and bad fighters on both sides of this war. But even if true, is your suggestion that we intentionally let ourselves be outnumbered on the hopes that skill level will even it out? In addition to being insulting to several of your fighting partners, its also just bad strategy. I prefer to go by in-game firepower and not handicap myself on the basis that my enemy might not know how to click buttons properly. Even if there is a skill disparity, can you really suggest any of us could have won this on our own? Because I highly doubt it. My point is that a secret agreement to prevent cooperation inherently favors the two spheres that don't need to cooperate in the first place. The only beneficiaries of that policy are you and BK. Now, had this war been unprompted, I could at least understand your claim to be defending the concept of multi-spheres from our ebil secret alliance. It still wouldn't be supported by the numbers, but there would be some logic to it. But in addition to having just fought each other (hardly secret ally behavior), we only turned to BK after leaks reveal they were plotting to get us both rolled! Whether we were right to judge them an immediate threat or not, it was clearly the driving factor behind our attack. Not some prior agreement to divide and conquer weaker spheres, as yours very much seems to be. Painting your entry as some balancing act to even out the sphere counts, despite said cooperation being needed for the match up and necessitated by circumstance, is just absurd. Especially when your agreement with BK against 'imbalance' would have allowed them to roll us in a far more lopsided contest.

I wouldn't shit on you if you weren't so bad. And, for the umpteenth time, I signed Mensa because I liked Buo et al. I despise real politik and always have. Which is just one of the main reasons I think you're a horrible player. For perspective, Partisan insulted me to my face while thinking I was too stupid to pick up on it, lied to me, arranged to get my alliance rolled because he didn't like my honest FA style, then ran like a coward into NK when he got caught. And I still don't bear him any ill will because he didn't expect any pity party after the fall out and eventually copped to it. You are the architect of the isolation you and by extension NPO endure. Your paranoia and perpetual victim-hood fuel this. People have been trying to get you to change your ways for years, carrot and stick approaches. But nothings going to change unless you want it to, and you do the work.

Hello everyone! I am super duper excited to announce that PrimeTime BootyTime has both an official weekly time and an official co-host! Our first regular show will be on Friday, July 5th at 7 PM Pacific Time (10 eestern tyme). Kimmy and I will be talking about the war and the performance of certain major alliances, as well as any major news updates that come up. We’ll wrangle guests during this week, and hopefully this time some of them decide to show up on time. We will be doing this show in the Factory Fresh Media discord group assuming that Charlie ever gets around to making a channel for us. We will also be looking for advertisers to buy ads on our show. Charlie and Kev are beaurocrocucks and so they’ll need to approve any ad before we play it, but we can also make the ads for you if you’d like. We're going to try to record it and put it somewhere, but there's nothing like hearing it live . Please hit me up if you need help getting to the discord channel or if you're lonely

Uhhh yeah, good luck with the rebuild. I wouldn't mind an explanation on exactly why your government agreed to this war, and what you were hoping to get from it. Perhaps that is just me?

Nothing in this post addresses my point. I don't care if you have a grudge against SK/CoS, unless you are claiming that is the CB now which I don't think you are. You entered this war on the pretence that Guardian/GOB were a threat to you based purely on their tiering rather than any tangible basis. If tiering is considering a basis for war now, then I guess we have a permanent CB against NPO for being tiered all on 20 cities like a large chunk of our guys are. Nevermind the fact that the "upper tier" is spread amongst multiple spheres and multiple alliances. "Upper tier consolidation" seems like a weak excuse when you literally just fought them and won in a war previously in Knightfall. You then bring out an incredibly weak set of logs that don't even prove a plan exists to hit you, that also predate your supposed shift in political orientation, and are therefore irrelevant. And you chose to press this claim mid war in a convenient defence of your old ally, despite your current allies now obvious concerns. And somehow through all this, you have the nerve to claim that you are somehow the wronged party in this entire affair and that we are out to get you. You were not attacked. None of your allies were attacked. In spite of the fact you were listed in the log. You entered the war of your own volition, in a limited capacity with an incredibly ridiculous CB, "tacitly" agreed to not expand, then expanded the war anyway. Every single piece of criticism you are receiving right now is of your own making. The simpler take on this that is much easier to get to based on the evidence we have to look at, is that you entered the war to defend BK. You implied this before when you said you had an agreement that you'd defend should any spheres join together to fight another, despite the fact our spheres combined were smaller than BK's. But that seems more a retroactive excuse than an actual policy.

Can I just quote this? Read it. That's it. You maintained a paperless agreement with BK, making you the largest possible grouping in the game no matter what anyone else did. Then, you tried to maneuver, with some success, an ailing and sporadically active t$ government into joining your old grouping. Good try: probably would have been fine if you guys could fight better, or if t$ lacked the ability or inclination to course-correct. Enjoy your war. You wanted it, not us.

FOR ? THE ? LAST ? TIME ? NOBODY ? IN ? CHAOS ? WANTED ? TO ? ATTACK ? NPO ?

So, this little line sounds a lot like the collusion/consolidation everyone is blaming you for. The most cursory of glances at the treaty web will reveal the vast disparity between your two spheres and ours. Chaos or KETOGG alone vs either of your spheres would be utterly crushed. Hence why KETOG apparently came to you guys seeking support in a war against BK (unless I am misreading some of your earlier posts, and I might well be). The only way for either smaller sphere to fight against the larger ones, defensively or offensively, would be to work together. So your agreement to prevent any two spheres from cooperating, is basically an agreement that either of you can pick off whichever smaller sphere you want with impunity - because a 1v1 with either of you vs Chaos or KETOGG would, by the numbers, be a blowout - but if the little guys ever have the audacity to work together to defend themselves, you'll get the gang back together to stomp them into the ground. I suppose I can see why you claim to have truly supported the 'mini-sphere' world, if you define that as two mini IQs taking turns to stomp smaller alliances with impunity.

I made some PnWballs for some alliances (not all of them) If you'd like your own buy them on PDS https://discord.gg/bs7HKDm

No shame in exiting early, aside from FR this ain't your war. And to be quite honest, I'm going to guess that FR wasn't the mastermind behind IQ's plotting so no shame in letting them go. Glad that people have thus far clawed back against their IQ overlords and refused life as Roq/IQ meat-shield.

I love how this thread has basically dissolved into Roq dropping peoples names and them having to come back to the forums to set the record straight. Glad to see I'm not the only one who has to endure this.

I can't tell if you're arguing for the Coalition forces or against? Two Blocs who where perfectly content knocking the shit out of one another, at least I was having a blast, get these logs about a probably the largest and somewhat dominant alliances making a plot to attack them, and then decide "Ya know. Instead of fighting each other about this, maybe we should team up" still at a disadvantage, "and roll into these guys instead of waiting for them to try and powerhouse their way in." So yes. In the face of massive odds against, it's pretty dynamic to charge at an enemy that handed out a CB on a silver platter. Ignoring all the other drama. No one's giving up because one alliance or another is on top. If anyone's giving up, it's because these people keep proving over and over that despite the opposition, they still dance to the same song and tune as they always have. Which is boring as shit. Like, cmon kids, that's enough of the cha-cha slide, please learn the douggie, or at least the boot scoot boogie.

@Akuryo This guy might be the most micro of all micros..... Sheepy really need to do something to stop any old Pleb making an alliance.

These are ridiculously high values. Has there been any consideration about how will this affect the rest of the game before implementing it? If you have credits, it basically makes blockades obsolete, hell you might as well go ahead and delete ships from the war system. As for the infrastructure/land change, I applaud it.

BK slaves/Roqbots colorized. ~

I feel that this situation has already been handled by the strike issued, and as far as I can tell, that punishment has worked, as we haven't had any more offenses from the player since. One user engaged in bad behavior, I issued a nation strike as a warning to correct behavior or be banned, and the behavior was corrected. I don't like banning people, and it's typically a last resort after repeated rule violations. Now, I'm sure someone is going to say "what about the forum thing and the Discord thing"?! My answer to that is based on longstanding policy of separation of moderation between the game, forum, and Discord (formerly IRC). This is for your (the players') protection. What happens on Discord will not affect your forum account, and what happens on the forum will not impact your game account, etc. Of course, if you're banned in-game, you are prohibited from the forum/Discord. But the point of separation of moderation is this: imagine how easy it would be to make a fake Discord account, for example, with your (insert yourself here) avatar and name. Someone pretends to be you, say a bunch of racist things in #politicsandwar in the P&W discord server, and before you know it, you're banned in-game and you don't know why. That would quickly allow for and encourage people to try and use moderation as a weapon to get ahead in the game, which is obviously something we want to prevent. At the end of the day, the point is this: until this player breaks more rules, I'm not going to take further action against them. If other users break the rules, we will handle it appropriately on a user-by-user basis. I am not going to blanket ban or warn an entire alliance based on the actions of a few individuals (again, imagine how easy it would be to create a few fake accounts and join {insert your alliance here} and do racist things, and then clamor for the entire alliance to be banned/warned as a result.) I do not condone or tolerate racism in the community, and it has always been against the rules. I am going to keep doing my best to enforce those rules and root out racism in the community. So far, it seems the warning in this case has worked, and if it turns out in the future that that the warning was not enough, the player will be banned then.

Is this just a tax farm so you can buy more coal?

I can appreciate you being honest about it, and OOC, I don't have a problem with people playing like that. I don't necessarily think its the ideal way to play, but I don't think anybody is any worse of a person for doing so. There will, of course, always be people opposing this and that in the game - there has to be, for political reasons. And consolidating heavily is also going to make you a big target, by virtue of being the biggest threat. With BK being so large and intending to attack us, this war would have happened honesty or no. But I think a lot of the bitterness has been directed primarily towards NPO, with BK mostly receiving IC flack for its plans and the more traditional wartime arguments and shitposts. Granted BK leadership has largely dissipated from public sight, or I imagine they would be getting the same flak, at least if they espoused the same arguments as NPO. Still, a big part of why NPO is getting so much special consternation is because of the lack of that honesty. It's not just about consolidating a mass of alliances, but the fact they lie about it at every turn and make up conspiracies to try and justify their actions, all while playing the perpetual victim. NPO and BK want to maintain ties and use a large treaty structure as a game strategy? Fine. I believe you, and I recognize it as a strategy. We may fight against it, but when the tabs close and we leave our game personas behind, its mostly water under the bridge. NPO is getting so much shit because they try to claim there is no cooperation or attempt to consolidate more allies. Because they claim they are acting purely defensively because Niz didn't use the right tone of voice when saying we don't want conflict, or because of some proof that only they have and can't ever show anybody. Because they insist they need - not want, I could respect that - but need to take out a sphere half their size. Because of some nonsense about hundreds of 'high octane former gov' who have plotted against them for years and can only be dealt with by overwhelming numbers. People just get exasperated having good faith repaid with guile.

My implication was that there is not the imbalance of 'talent' that you are suggesting, but even if there was, its a stupid argument. We are supposed to just give our enemies a massive handicap every war because sometimes they can't coordinate well? Are you seriously suggesting we should be facing BK by ourselves, that Chaos would actually survive more than two days in that war, even if we were the super elite Game Fuel chugging 'elites' you think we are? Because what you're saying is we should just willingly get rolled, there's no two ways about it. Maybe when we even the numbers it becomes more favorable to our side due to better coordination, but without evening them, we stand no chance at all. Apparently it is ok for BK to actively plot the demise of other alliances, but should said alliances group together to fight back, that crosses the line. We should just let them pick us off one by one. But of course, that's even if we did have some insurmountable skill gap with all the super actives on one side and inactives on the other. But we don't. Yes, there are shitty fighters on BK's side, clearly. There people on our side messing up beiges, firing missiles when they have full air forces, stat padding rather than suicide into key battles, etc. Perhaps the difference is that we try and correct their behavior, I don't know. But you are hardly the only ones dealing with new and more casual players. There are are hundreds of players on the Chaos/KETOG/Rose side, are you really suggesting they are all ex gov who spend every 5 minutes checking their phones for the next MAP? Lets look at Chaos, because I am intimately more familiar with my own bloc than others. We have TKR, with a competent milcom, yes, but also a mass recruiting alliances that has to deal with an intake of new players. The exact same argument used by BK the last time we had this skill disparity argument. CoS was suffering from inactivity, and for gods sakes Roq, you're talking to SK. It honestly pains me to say this, but we're not good. We ran around headless the past few wars with an empty milcom that is finally seeing its first new additions in three years. Soup is young and working out the kinks, but does have active players. As for KETOG, they have their mix as well. Maybe they have a more lopsided % of active to inactive than we do, last war would bear that out. But once again your lumping the two of us into some big group! We were just fighting each other before BK directly threatened us, and for the last time, attacked BK directly after their plans to hit us were leaked. Edit: to respond this nonsense: They asked you, former members of IQ, to hit BK, because they couldn't have done it alone. That was refused and they chose to attack us instead. Somehow this implicates us in a plan to attack both of you?

Roq once again your paranoia is your downfall. You probably think this song is about you? dont you? You seem to think that we would be able to pull all three spheres together again to rally a hit on you. First, if you stay out, this current war with BK probably goes on for like 2-3 months, because Thanos is the worst, and he likes to suck the fun out of everything win or lose. Which means most of us have been fighting for 3-4 months. So when that ends, its probably going to be atleast another few months before anyone involved even starts thinking about war again. If you stayed out, you now have atleast 6 months to work on your FA, and probably pull one of the microspheres like say Chaos to work with you and hit us (i am sure they are not thrilled about us hitting them before BK showed up). Because we know you are separate from BK, and not nearly as large of a threat. Instead, NSO inserted itself into a war it really didn't need to, put a giant target on your back, reinforced the IQ ties, and now half the game is shitting on you. And you have shown that you haven't really broken from IQ, so to take you down we will probably all need to team up again, which basically undoes all the work we have been trying to do since the end of knightfall. Right now, credit to BK, intentional or not, they are doing what tS/NPO did during knightfall, they aren't all over the forums spouting nonsense. They are sitting back and letting NPO go nuts on the forums, which moves the target off of them. They are letting you guys feel the heat of that spotlight, which will probably follow you post war as well. TLDR: NPO joined a war they didn't need to, they are getting rolled, and are probably going to get rolled in the next one because of it.

The exact level of quality shitposting I'd expect from the man who merged into Cornerstone.

Lolololololololololololololololololol

The most amusing part of the conspiracy theory is that we apparently set up a fake war, somehow managed to guess correctly that a tCW member would leak their war plans that would mention rolling us both. Those plans would detail both BK and Covenant, allowing us to legitimately blitz a good portion of their sphere. Then also be able to salvage enough military for Chaos to fight again in a very short turn around. So this means one of two things. - I am just basically a god at 4d chess with insane foresight and guess work -Or you're just dumb I'll take either answer because one inflates my ego and the other is dead set accurate.

So to clarify for those at home. BKsphere is so insanely large that they have to fight against 2-3 spheres at once to be "mildly outnumbered" in city count.