Jump to content

Sketchy

Wiki Mod
  • Content Count

    1887
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    62

Everything posted by Sketchy

  1. I don't see what the big deal is. Being downvoted won't kill you. If being downvoted dissuades you from speaking your mind, seems to me you lack the conviction to stand behind your post. Or you are wrong and can't take criticism. The karma system is pretty stupid to be fair. I only find upvotes/downvotes useful for guaging peoples opinions on specific posts. I don't see any value in having a scoreboard, but w/e. The better thing to do would be to add more types of reaction to posts if possible. That should clear up any confusion as to why people are downvoting you. Split up downvote into "Disagree", "Dumb", and "Who Cares" reactions. Change upvote to "Agree". "Funny", "Helpful" or something. Not sure why we have an upvote and a like button.
  2. Still think its good news? lmfao I repeat, lmfao micros man
  3. lmfao so it lasted literally 1 turn jesus
  4. Don't see what you are worried about. Just create a one man AA, name it Cornerstone, and Gorge will merge right into you.
  5. Considering how many people seem to be botting it without any recourse I don't see an issue in a nerf since I assume you won't be moderating it instead.
  6. How did this thread escalate so quickly lmfao. You should all feel bad when its Gorge who is the voice of reason.
  7. I wouldn't use Alex's ability to do things as a metric for their possibility lmfao.
  8. Hold on a minute.... so now your saying the logs were true and NPO was indeed planning to hit KETOG? So the entire basis for the initial war that was leaked, which you spent so long trying to argue was false, is true? And you wonder why your credibility is in question? Jesus lmfao
  9. Putting aside for the moment the fact you just admitted you only entered the war because BK was losing but you don't have a secret treaty (lol ok). Your timeline still doesn't add up, in fact if this is true it makes it look even worse. You are claiming that on the 20th you thought the war could at least be stalemated, when you agreed to hit only GOB/Guardian. Then in 2-3 days you had changed your mind and decided to enter based on the argument that you had logs TKR was planning to expand onto you and breach said agreement. At the time you were saying the GOB/Guardian hit had nothing to with BK's war and now you are saying you wanted to enter the BK war all along.
  10. Sketchy

    So...What Now?

    I wasn't aware this was a goal you were striving for but I commend you on taking up such a difficult challenge.
  11. t$ entered the war on the 19th Roq. One day before NPO did. Not sure how TKR could have been planning to expand onto the NPO front on 17th when it didn't exist until the 20th. Also who was this compromise about GOB/Guardian with? t$? A compromise instead of what, entering the war directly? Which you then did? And claimed you only did because TKR was planning to hit you? Thanks for making my case for me I guess?
  12. Except for the fact that NPO entered the war on the 20th of June, and then expanded it on the 23rd of June. So your claim is that in that timeframe, you got logs of TKR planning to expand the war onto NPO, and had a week or more to hash out an expansion? Which means either you were lying then or you are lying now. Or both.
  13. A week or more? But I thought the expansion was a reaction to logs from a reliable source that TKR and Coalition A was planning to hit NPO and expand the war? WHICH LIE AM I SUPPOSED TO BELIEVE THIS IS TOO MUCH I bet you guys told t$ about your secret treaty with BK during this conversation too right lmfao.
  14. Cute how you left out you breaking an agreement and entering a war without informing your ally to defend a former ally in BK who you claimed to have split away from, which started the strain in your relations in the first place.
  15. Keep up man that was like 5 narratives ago. Its Buorhann man bad now.
  16. After some digging I have found a leaked transcript of Roquentin's prepared response. There's an issue with giving a morale boost to an opposing coalition whose most vocal leader claims to be winning/going to win and says stuff like "you'll see", any slightest bit of reason for them not to come to the table and accept the surrender/meme terms is problematic. The rest is about Buorhann saying you will win. The level of arrogance exhibited in recent topics shows the point. The fact that he takes every peripheral dropping out as a big victory and a rationale for holding out just means this will take longer to get to its conclusion. It's ultimately immaterial to the actual war as most of the alliances dropping out aren't exactly the ones engaging the most. Furthermore, There has never been a time where any coalition just said "hey guys you can peace out unilaterally." It's a ridiculous premise. And yet The Syndicate peaced out unilaterally without consulting their ally first. This is not acceptable. It looks ridiculous to peace out because of fatigue when the other side has been at war for significantly longer and drastically more intense combat. So yeah. My stance is clear. I'm not going to respond further because the obtuse trolling that is a hallmark of your side, especially when Buorhann has come out and said "You'll see" "You’ll see" is considered a pejorative by my people in Pacifica. Sort of like Fredo.
  17. Man this thread derailed quickly lmfao.
  18. inb4 "Buorhann is mean to us so lets hit our allies for leaving us" Congrats on peace
  19. He is trying but you keep responding to him and Abbas can't help himself.
  20. How is any of that relevant to anything I said. If you want to yap about irrelevant stuff why are you responding to me. If our strategy is holding out, so is yours. So I really don't see what your point is there either. Most of the micros who peaced out on your side were as loosely if not more loosely affiliated to your side than North Point or Ming are to ours (Both are direct Rose allies so idk what your point is there). What does what Buorhann is saying have to do with what I said in my original post? How does Buorhanns supposed arrogance have anything to do with your policy of people exiting wars? I feel like you are having an argument with yourself at this point.
  21. Yes. And if I was my father i'd have divorced her for saying Squirtle was better too.
  22. Maybe hes a fan of the prestigious sport of mental gymnastics and just wants to tune in to see who got the gold medal.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.