Sketchy

You already tend to lose a tonne of infrastructure (which reduces your income) and a tonne of resources after losing a war. Whats the point?

The reason wars are longer has nothing to do with the changing playerbase. The war system was changed. The old system let you just sit on and cycle people repeatedly with air strikes over and over for 5 days, and then immediately sub someone in to hit once the war expired, there wasn't much of a way to comeback. Which meant once people were down, they were out, and surrendering was rational as no amount of pride would let you do more damage to your foes. Now its almost impossible to be pinned down permanently. So now wars are only really ended when one side gives out or runs out of resources. You can continue to fight and do damage to your opponent indefinitely. This means things like what terms are presented make far more of an impact in how long the war goes. Before if you asked for 1bn in reps, they had to pay it or suffer it and more in damages, with no path for recourse.

Lmfao here we go again You might not have been the ones who came up with the terms, but you spent the better part of a month arguing for their merit as if they were yours. By the last few weeks of that war, TCW was barely fighting, like less than 10% of all wars were TCW, TRF was getting jumped and dicked repeatedly by us as their activity waned and we had flipped their stats into the negative. TKR was the one doing all the work. At any point you could have chosen simply to drop those terms because you had all of the bargaining power. The only reason those terms ever got dropped is because TCW and TRF lacked the stamina to maintain them and none of you lacked the ability to argue with me for their merit (probably because there was none, as we all saw thanks to that Alex/Queen M thread). Its simple really, when you are the primary negotiator or a large and integral part of a coalition, and therefore have a large amount of leverage, you don't get to hide behind your smaller and less important allies when they try and push terms you supposedly don't support. I do find it ironic that according to multiple members of TKR and TCW, TGH was majorly responsible for the 6 month NAP with IQ you guys all complained about, despite being a smaller alliance in a wider coalition, with no leverage (what we gonna say, "If you peace out with a 6 month NAP, we'll.....peace out?" lmfao). Yet TKR apparently bares no responsibility for the terms their allies tried to push (they only failed because your allies were shit), despite making up like 70% of the coalition size, doing all the legwork, not even being allied to one of them, and being in the dominant position in the war. Have you learned nothing?

IF anyone deserves to have money extorted from them Moonshadow does. Literally don't care carry on Rose.

What is worse though, Noctis derailing threads, or Gorge merging into Cornerstone.

This is the first time I've seen the OOC forum used in ages shhh Wiggum let them fight overmoderating is what killed it in the first place

You forgot to mention that Gorge merged into Cornerstone.

I'm not disputing planes are king, I'm disputing the logic that they shouldn't be. Noone complains that the Queen is too powerful in chess and needs to be nerfed because of it, the understanding is that the queen is a powerful unit that should be protected at all costs and used carefully and responsibly. A balance of power between navy, ground and air just turns the combat system into a rock paper scissors simulator. That being said, sheepy should have retooled score values for units ages ago back when he agreed with the suggestion in like 2016. IF you want to "fix" the imbalance, simply increase the score value of planes and reduce the score values of tanks so they are more representative. Tanks are heavily neutered by their cost/power ratio and their overinflated score. Addressing the latter issue would be easy enough.

Was a bad idea before and its still a bad idea now.

Boy 2019 is going to be a fun year.

So IQ is trump? Lmfao

Lolwut its public knowledge that everyone on KT's side of the AC conflict was going to hit IQ and IQ preempted KT based on leaks. Why would anyone be upset they hit KT first lmfao. Also, I didn't win Most Hated or Worst Forum Poster this year so clearly I didn't criticise them enough. I will have to up my game for 2019

I don't know man you tell me you were the one who said it lmfao

Is that why you wanted to know where he lives you fricking loonbag lmfao

But you aren't mad right. Lmfao so "not mad" you spend 90% of your posts talking about it lmfao.