Sketchy

Where do I sign.

Except TGH only took 4.7bn in infra damage during surfs up and we have a 32bn net. Imagine being so bad your side has to rely on Ketogg stats from a previous war to pretend you are winning. I guess we could always brag that we are carrying both sides of the same war according to you Ketogg will graciously accept the surrender of both sides to us. Should be fun.

You are only positive in net damage by dragging in other alliances who have left your coalition. Why deviate from the strategy now?

I mean I'm not against the suggestion, just moderating expectations. Personally I'd rather realpolitik be gone altogether, as it inevitably leads to all the worst aspects of the game, but I've long since accepted that as an unfeasible goal. Ultimately it'll exist as long as there is a demand for it.

That is an optimistic take tbh. I suspect the more likely result is people will declare RP wars to hide their actual reasons for going to war, and if people DO declare war simply for RP reasons, everyone will still suspect an underlying motive and call them out anyway. Would take a radical shift in the communities attitude towards war for that to work.

Pixelhugging always ends the same way. The longer you dodge war the more fragile your alliance will be when the time comes to face the music. I suspect this lesson has come too late. To be fair I don't think its the same people. DB is large enough now that they should be in a position to defend themselves. If they can't then no one else is responsible for that but DB. This just further proves that protectorates enable alliances to avoid ever reaching their full potential and that people should drop them more liberally when they prove unproductive.

Oh I don't know Roq. You had a secret alliance with the sphere you supposedly broke from while you both were the two largest groupings. You backstabbed your own ally to defend your former ally. You had your narratives for hitting GOB/Guardian prepared and ready before we ever hit BK. (And they were bullshit) You were in talks with BKsphere about hitting us. You only enforce your arbitrary "balancing attempts" on people not called BK. Apparently BK with their 900 nations hitting Chaos isn't worthy of your benevolent intervention. No you'd rather hit KETOGG instead. Which is why your attempt to retroactively justify your shit with "it was just to keep balance" falls flat.

Yes. And it doesn't say anything about "disbanding communities" lmfao. Thank you for proving my point for me. As I have stated many times in the past, a community can only disband if it chooses. Disbanding an alliance isn't a realistic goal for anyone. Keep saying you don't have hegemonic ambitions. Your secret treaties and fake splits have already been revealed. All the shit you attack TKR for doing you do yourself. Also, you have Buorhann and I mixed up, I'm the 2ic, he is the leader. I assumed it was a mistake in the first post but guess not.

I have made no mention of "disbanding communities". New bullshit every week with you lot. Anything to justify your failed hegemony.

How dare you assume our hierarchical structure you evil bigot. I will have you know, Hodor outranks me in many things. I shall promptly compile a list and submit it to your superior @Roquentin for closer inspection.

Your attempts to build a hegemony are toxic and hostile.

Lmfao I guess the real threat to Citadels continued existence was you all along. Good luck to Citadel on finding a better ally than Yakuza to take their place. Shouldn't be too hard most alliances qualify.

Clearly living up to your name.

Just because its a shitpost doesn't mean its not also criticism Its so people can filter out the various things they don't want to read presumably, the AA forums have had a problem with being bloated by announcements that aren't important, clogging up the more important ones.