Sketchy

It's not growing anymore. We hit our target. SNN fake news.

Why are you spying the poor disenfranchised youth Velyni?

HAHAHAHA good luck with that bud You broke the last one Everyone else needs guarantees not you lmfao

Defaulting on a loan debt would not be grounds to void a NAP. Rose wouldn't have been able to use it as justification to break NAP, anymore than Camelot can use this fake loan buying scheme as a justification to break a nap against TFP. Also, the idea that an offshore, which is typically controlled by government members or people with trust within the alliance, doesn't fall under Rose is ridiculous. If Epi was so certain Rose was intending to break the nap with some ridiculous loan scheme that no major alliance would look at and say Rose had a case, why did Epi hit TFP and claim it was part of the event, instead of hitting Rose. Because he's trying to find any angle to justify what's he's done and each time one is thoroughly debunked he has to conjure a new excuse.

I take full credit for badgering him for hours until he finally cracked and unwittingly admitted he can't prove anything. Reminder: He broke the NAP and hit TFP. None of these claims ever mattered anyway.

Apparently, old friend, you're stuck in a loop—because we've already gone over this in DMs, and now again here. I even asked you directly what path you thought I should take, and in the end, I chose the one I was being pushed toward anyway: to carve my own trail, half indifferent to the crowd watching. To your credit, you did advise me to steer clear of diplomatic and public affairs. I’ll give you that. But I couldn’t ignore the pull to speak up—not when it involved old friends, not with Cam and Buck both in the picture. I'm sharing what I believe to be true, cutting through the noise you so often warned about. But here’s the thing: your past advice now stands in contradiction to your current stance. Your words are colliding with themselves. That’s not on me. Why assume we’re not civil? It’s entirely possible—and in this case, true—that we’ve simply agreed to disagree on a warm, familiar note. I still consider him a friend, disagreement or not. He’s offered both concern and critique, which I genuinely appreciate. Funny how quickly people leap to conflict before even reading the signs. Whatever happened to showing a little human compassion despite differing views? But hey—keep it coming, schmuckems 💋 The saltier you get, the more entertained I am. Ah, I see—we’re not allowed to maintain friendships with people we occasionally disagree with. Got it. Apparently, resolving conflicts and extending grace is off the table now. Noted, and added to my mental checklist. I got you, homie—101%. 😉 P.S. Seems like other people’s shortcomings are now my responsibility, too. Duly noted.

May I advise you put your posts into chapgpt and say "make this smarter". Here let me do it for you: Here’s a refined and more articulate version of your post that keeps the fiery tone while making it clearer and more polished: Well, hello there. Let’s be honest—it’s no surprise to anyone that your statements are far from accurate. After what SIN pulled in the last war, both in-game and on the forums, it was an unmitigated disaster, plain and simple. Everyone knows that, and anyone pretending otherwise is just fooling themselves. SIN held most of the merger potential at the outset—no shock there, given that it was the final stop for everyone spinning out from Soup. You’re trying to paint it otherwise, but the truth is obvious, and you know it. Especially after the last war, when you tried so hard to convince people to do your bidding—epic flop. Your words have been well documented across the forums since then. Let’s not forget that Rose and TFP’s involvement was hardly random, either. TFP and TI have a long history of teaming up, often through backchannel deals with no paper trail. And Oblivion? Still defending Rose-aligned targets, even across different spheres, through spy work and mercenary operations—everyone knows it. They’ve been playing this game in the shadows for years. So let’s talk about this year. Isn’t it suspicious how all these alliances—supposedly separated by treaty—still manage to pull the same strings from the backrooms? There’s more than just Cam’s connections to IQ alliances from the NPOLT era—many of them still hold the same post-war dispositions when you talk to them now, even as recently as a few days ago. Why single out one group when BK and others still cling to the same core values? And let’s be real—any alliance I mentioned here can be easily checked. Their words, actions, and even Discord logs are right there at our fingertips. With that much evidence built up over the years, how can I not let people chase their own curiosities and push their own resolves? There’s no need for espionage or mercenary proxies when the truth is already this plain to see. Let me know if you’d like to tweak the tone or emphasize any particular part! It still reads like nonsensical crack addict stream of consciousness drivel but at least I can understand it lmfao.

Bro I have been trying to get included in a conspiracy theory all week but instead of getting Epi I get discount Epi. Like 80% of the people in this list are literally currently in Singularity. A bunch of them have quit. I wish I could argue with you over this but it's actually so mentally deranged it defeats itself lololol

Extensions are doing DoWs now? When did this become the meta. You mean we need to write a DoW for our offshores too now? Is there no end to this torment?

I am disappointed. I only skimmed over the logs but I don't think I or Sin was mentioned even once. A real blow to all the conspiracy theories.

>Me expecting some crazy leaks. >Bunch of people trying to find ways to preempt a hit they knew was coming. Paranoid about who was entering. Ngl I'm underwhelmed.

Me agreeing with WANA wasn't on my bingo card for the year.

I would imagine its up to TFP what the timeline of their defense is. I haven't seen any one claim the treaties aren't being honored, rather that TFP is looking for additional support. But if you'd rather focus on that then the actual nap break, might want to work on your priorities.

I see one screenshot, with no context, where he makes one statement about you "flipping narratives" on RON. Which is immaterial. That doesn't constitute a NAP breach. Nothing in this paragraph constitutes a NAP breach. Payment, or quid pro quo, is what constitutes a NAP breach. If you have evidence of payment of a quid pro quo post that. You haven't proven nor claimed they told them to hit you. You've claimed Velyni said you betrayed them, that he told his view of what went down in the prior war, and that it was at odds with what he told you. None of that is a NAP breach. Myrmidons being a mercenary alliance is immaterial again. You need proof they were hired. You cannot break a NAP on a hunch. You were made responsible for Samurai's breaches of the NAP because they are an extension of Camelot. I warned you not to bring Samurai too deep into the discussion on RON. If you want to have THAT conversation we can, but we both know I know enough to argue against that. That'll be the last warning I give you. You cannot withdraw from a NAP unilaterally, without evidence, and then target a party not in breach of the nap. Every single nap ever signed was done at a coalition level, coalitions fight people, that does not mean that if one member of a coalition breaches the nap, that you can then target a party that wasn't in breach. Even if somehow this logic worked, you never sufficiently proved that Rose was in breach of the nap, as evidenced by your response to me, where you haven't provided evidence that they did any of the things you are claiming. If you had such evidence, and presented it, that would be enough to condemn Rose (Assuming the evidence lived up to the accusation, a point I need to clarify given your tendency to leap 10 logical steps on a small shred of information), but it still would not absolve you of breaking the NAP to hit TFP. You have done your utmost to try and make this entire situation about Rose, because public sentiment against Rose is negative, and that means people will be more likely to take accusations you make against them at face value without any actual concrete evidence. But you didn't hit Rose, you hit TFP. TFP did not breach the NAP. You still had a NAP with TFP, and you broke it. This is literally just a lie. You didn't intend to avoid fighting alliances you used to have a NAP with because you were presented with the choice, and as you say in the next sentence, and chose to hit one. You contradicted yourself literally the next sentence. You broke the NAP. It's that simple.

Already had this debate in RON, but for posterities sake: You broke a NAP. This whole argument falls flat on multiple levels. 1. You haven't proven Rose goaded anyone into hitting you. No logs. No basis for this claim at all. 2. BUT even if you had proven this claim, it wouldn't be a nap breach. It's not breaking the terms of a nap to discuss your grievances with an alliance to other alliances. You would need proof of a payment or quid pro quo for this to be a nap breach. You've not even made the claim, yet alone shown proof of it. 3. BUT even if it was a nap breach, as you claim, this still wouldn't justify hitting TFP. You cannot unilaterally leave a NAP you signed with multiple parties to hit a party that wasn't in breach of the nap. If for arguments sake, you could prove Rose had broken your nap, which you haven't at all, you could justify hitting Rose, not hitting TFP. 4. Your claim regarding the need for rebuild money is irrelevant. You had two options to target in the Arrgh event. You could have chosen to target the party whom you didn't possess a NAP with. You still chose to violate your nap. Everything I read from both the video you provided and the logs you shared was a complete mish mash of logs much of which didn't seem to directly connect to claims you were making. Many other points in the post seem like pieces of claims to try and build/support a case against Rose, such as this loan/debt trapping scheme, which you've not sufficiently proven either, but since you didn't hit Rose, and nothing short of a NAP violation can justify you breaching the nap, they are irrelevant. Rose seems to be irrelevant here entirely. You can't use them to justify breaching the nap to hit TFP. You are in violation of the nap. Congratulations on hitting your peak crash out.