Daveth

I guess that's one way to look at it. From what I gather, they repeatedly denied your claims, and you didn't prove them wrong and don't seem to intend to, which is fine. While it does seem they've stopped engaging here, this could be for any number of reasons like: - They believe they'd be repeating points made ad nauseam and chose to do whatever else; - They can't prove the negative of "TKR wasn't working on a deal of their own"; - They have started reaching out privately, etc. I'm not sure that means the matter has been settled? That said, I'm not particularly vested on the narrative either way, was simply curious.

Cool, good on you to acknowledge it - kind of weird to take it out on TKRs folks or Wilson in the crossfire. I'm just saying, its a bit harder to argue you didn't want a NAP when you've signed an extension, and then decide from there between their claims and yours, y'know?

Woah woah, woah. I'll have you know the one true Viridian Entente brought Aurora down to its knees!

I'm gonna be honest, I find it largely understandable @lancelot1 or anyone would take issue with going along with your claims on TKR, right? Not to say I haven't had my bone to pick with them in the past as well... But I've often noticed there seems to be a dynamic of FA heads alluding to having evidence of their claims for the sake of posturing and then withholding said evidence for the sake of OPSEC or some other similar concern. This makes it basically impossible for anyone, let alone someone who has no reason to trust you and doubt their government, to be convinced or take your claim of current or past wrongdoing at face value. From my understanding, there seems to be a chunk of context missing, which makes it more credible to me as an outside observer that you were "bailed out", "rescued", whatever you want to call it, than the proposed alternative you spoke on extensively. So I don't think its entirely unfair to be dismissive or skeptical when the burden of proof is on you? Again I don't even really like @Dr James Wilson either lol.

@Krampus If you know, you know. Anyway, hopefully it works out for y'all!

Frankly I don't know either. Epi and I have had multiple conversations that went well, and the same applies for anyone on our end that spoke to him, so I figured we were past this point where he believes we're out to get him...

My question is what does this have to do with us? Why was @EpimetheusTalks accusing EVH? It's seriously bizarre to me.

I take it back, nicely done.

Yeah I understand the qualms behind a shared leadership also, trust me, coming off VE. But between Jax and Piggy they convinced me it can work, and I'm confident it will. Uhhh. One is an eclipse and the other is a blackhole... two separate celestial events? Not to mention we're a space cult.

The real tragedy here is @Sketchypicking Grievous over Count Dooku.

As foretold in the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Thanks for the food, I was getting bored.