Leaderboard

Our apologies to Shifty, for leaking this ahead of his wonderful updates, but Bad Company has withdrawn it's membership in Vanguard. We wish our friends in Polaris, OWR, and TUE all the best. Signed for Bad Company, The Management

Day 5 produced unexpected results. While these vacationing TKR sphere members have yet to be seen actually on vacation, @Buorhann was spotted eating some lettuce And the rare @Placentica

Spectrum to TKR, TKR to Rose, Rose to Vanguard, now Vanguard to ???? BC people are traveling around the world.

This is a proud moment for us.

Currently when you have ground control or air superiority on an opponent, it shows their army combat values as if they are not under these controls, I am proposing that we update this to show their modified combat Value from the space control. Example: the opponent below is currently under ground control, making him able to use only 66.7% of his planes. His army value says 1410 however in reality it should be 939 as only 313 of his aircraft can defend. While we are on the subject of combat screens another change I am proposing is to make your choices such as how many units to send or to not equip soldiers with munitions to update the army value, max loot, max infra stats shown instead of being static to the original values. As you can see above, selecting these values currently shows the same values as before.

So the present system is a three rank system of Leader/Heir/Member Title. While it's great, I was wondering if there could be a means to edit those titles to include subtitles, or unique member titles. While its mostly cosmetic in nature, it would be interesting to be allowed to customise our own member ranks and the like from an overall alliance point of view. Moreover, in larger alliances, having different titles is quite common, and this just allows for greater alliance customisation and the like. The folks who can do this of course will be the Officers or those given the rights by the alliance leader/leaders. Also I was wondering with this addition, if you could also add individual officer masks, rather than across the board? It makes it difficult to have a set of folks at the same rank having the same access, when they could be different departments and the like, so it'd just make things easier if that could be added? This would work better with having greater control of the titles/ranks/powers. Thanks for considering the suggestion!

I don't care

Been busy with irl and just woke up from a nap. You caught me sleeping. GG

I can't check who is online(mobile). Only can check who is browsing this topic and it's only me rn. Eeny, meeny, miny, moe 47 Nuclear Knights vs me reality https://thumbs.gfycat.com/FlimsyHastyAmazondolphin-max-1mb.gif

NG, the call is coming from inside the building! Spaceman Thrax Sweeeeet Ronny D Tuanduy1102 Featherine LongSilver Shiho Nishizumi Who Me Natalia Poklonskaya Micchan Keegoz durmij TheNG Rising Hodor Alex Senyor Puloy #3, Which is currently Pantheon. I feel like having Alex is both an automatic win and an automatic loss. We'd probably get him to delete Pantheon, but he'd make it twice as large somehow, then he'd say he could fix it if we gave him credits, and by that point Natalia and I would just wander off to talk about asses, assuming i didn't already explode from being in the same AA as Keegoz. Let's call it a tie.

Players Online: Nice, I have the mods and top shitposters. Dream team right here. What scrubs are going to get beaten up today? RNG: Hey, wait a minute. Isn't that- …. Do we win?: Everyone else has had their chance, I suppose it's only fair I get my turn...

Strong GOB values.

Are you serious? How can you hate this guy, he responded so nicely. He's given you a valid reason and taken your concern into consideration, you're so fricking petty I can't even comprehend it.

I think so, not sure if it was an actual suggestion topic but I definitely remember saying that in another suggestion topic about heir permissions. There should definitely be more ranks, personally I'd like the ability to create many different ranks and an admin control panel that allows leaders to choose what powers these ranks have access to in the bank/taxes section and officer control panel, so that you wouldn't have to monitor officers to make sure they aren't using powers not related to their position. However at a bare minimum there should be two new ranks, one above and one below the current officer rank, so you don't have to choose between giving all officers bank access or making someone an heir just to give bank access. Then the lower rank to serve as a lower gov position.

He's probably getting confused with Bad Company. You know: The Bad The Company The Bloc.

This may be a bit nitpicky as far as in-game suggestions are concerned, but it would be helpful to have an adversary's activity status listed on the war page. This would allow us to verify the activity/inactivity of our opponents without needing to repeatedly visit their nation pages for status checks. Example:

Does BC plan to be diplomatically aligned in Vanguard? Because we all know that membership in Vanguard is different from being diplomatically aligned with Vanguard.

I know right?! I keep my calculator up just to be sure whenever there's doubt, but this'd make everything so much easier. The "max money lootable" should also update when you change the number of tanks/soldiers you're applying to the battle as well. Related to that, the maximum airstrike damage changes if you apply fewer aircraft, so that ought to update as well.

Great minds think alike!

I like the idea but this is one of those things that I can see Admin going overboard with and it further ruining raiding as a play style. Maybe have the protection lapse after your activity turns purple (7+ days).

Destroying Acadia under NG

Perma-VM and deleted, respectively. I guess GoB is lucky they aren't counting that in the war stats.

Sorry folks, Pansy was driving:

They built back up after we mass beiged them in the 1st round, and came back fighting. Honestly it's hard for an alliance of their size to deal with 2 battle hardened alliances. Think we had 3-to-1 numbers on them or something. So we aimed to keep the war short. Just wanted to get our goal done and our point across. Honestly this time around, they were pleasant to deal with, and while many members of both KT and TGH still feel angry at TRF - I do hope they acknowledge that this conflict was much more peaceful than the shitfest we got dragged into during the summer.

@Ukunaka You also put something like this forward awhile ago yeh?

God no. Please don't lose anymore wars to us after this. We can't stand it.

The Golden Horde (TGH) and Knights Templar (KT) have agreed to end hostilities with The Revolutionary Front (TRF) under the condition TRF moves off the color sphere black. TRF has agreed to do so and will move to another color sphere once our collective beige expires. Here’s to turning the page. o7 Tagged for The Revolutionary Front Jane, co-Visionary Réjs, co-Visionary Signed for The Golden Horde Buorhann “Ockey loves dicks”, Orbis’ Great Hippo Khan Sketchy “Ockey is a dick”, The Beklare-Bek Shiho “Ockey wants dick”, Khan of War Hodor “Ockey draws dicks on the map”, Khan of Diplomacy Partisan “Ockey snek dick”, Khan of Discipline Signed for Knights Templar Grand Master: Keegoz ? --------------------------------- Grand Seneschal: Thalmor ☭ Grand Chancellor: Vince McMahon ★ Grand Almoner: Theodosius ? Grand Marshal: Horsecock ?

Clearly this is another one of evil NPO plots. All this data crunching is clearly NPO setting up a statistical hegemony in this game and killing PnW or something Jokes aside, I think Frawley mentioned it somewhere here that once its fully functional, should be able to do it for other alliance wars, depending on permissions received etc.

Link - https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=112098Ruler - Wolf Of The MoonViolation - Multi trades

This is disappointing, Shifty would have made this way more dramatic and suspenseful!

If this is done, I can pin the corresponding post whenever you want. Take your time.

We frequently have brought in new people and we also don't try to focus on specific members. Any mass member alliance doesn't have a much higher average. They at times have higher individual members but they choose to have a higher city count stratification. With the VM numbers being counted(people in VM count towards alliance city count fyi), your ally TKR has 2095/137 aka 15.2 city presently and it wasn't much higher before the war and they've existed longer than we have, so coming at us constantly with this doesn't really make a lot of sense. We can see how VE ended up and that would be a better point of comparison rather GOB vs NPO. Your wars were minor comparatively to great wars since you founded grumpy and involved minimal resources expenditure and you didn't have to fund anyone else after them. If we didn't lose the wars and had the relative security GOB did, you can bet our average would be higher. The relative security you had in GOB enabled you to continue buying those cities despite diminishing returns on the expenses and you were also able to buy higher infra than most people at the <25 city count. I could still be in a small membercount alliance and if it had aligned the right people our average would super high, but that's because we wouldn't have had to fund anyone besides ourselves.

Hm, good catch. I'll take a look. It looks like the information is still being tracked properly, but not displayed correctly. Maybe it's just too many data for the graph, I'm not sure.

Wait... No Warpool and no Twynn means... I just entered in the soldiers killed leaderboard!!! (first non-raider I think) What a beautiful way to go

Sorry, but can I just say it's complete bullshit that the Great VE War name is now settled business? I miss the poll for what, 4 years? And suddenly its a done deal and my vote doesn't count? Some of us don't have the luxury of opening a browser window every few months.

If they're mating, it's them.

Day three. Still no signs of TKR sphere vacationers. Though a possible @Smith and @TheNG Rising sighting.

Chief Wiggum? More like chief buzzkill

That's interesting coming from you. You waited till multiple other alliances cleared way for you and yet you still screwed up your initiation in the current war. We're still here though kosmo, if you got an issue with us. Apparently you just like taking it up the ass and waiting till people do your dirty work, and still somehow find a way to mess up.

Checks their VM lists Yea... Gonna say that they are not having fun.

Pantheon didnt declare war on Nova Riata, they declared war on Vijay

You say "front lined" tcw but when Grumpy and tCW attacked your whales half of them did nothing and kept on sleeping. One guy didn't even have ships so that's an instant blockade. Still It'll be fun destroying their Infra, I heard Grumpy has made quite the profit from looting your bank. Also regarding the so called "reparations", how prey tell do you plan to enforce them? If anyone on your side should get reps paid from our side, then its Rose and t$ who actually had good planning and not zerg swarm tactics, Pantheon certainly doesn't deserve reps from that. The vast majority of damage to tCW come from Rose, t$ etc, Pantheon was more so an annoyance. Gee I wonder why they left? Wow, obviously you are toast if Shlappa insulted you like that, I don't know how you'd come back from that. But also did you even bother to check that Shlappa was not and has never been with Nova and is with us in tCW? And if you guys got triggered by a little bog standard banter than that's hilarious, and show how thin skin some people can be. At least guys in KT/TGH/BK/t$ and many others are great fun to chat with and have a fight with since they make good memes. All you guys are doing is making yourself look bad. EDIT: Just adding onto what Reuben said, the c word out here is much more common than you think. If Shlappa really wanted to insult you Fist he would've. Also fun fact couple years ago our High court ruled that calling someone the c word isn't classed as "offensive conduct".

That's what I was thinking, Pantheon's perfect excuse to feel a part of the action was to hit someone who didn't even reach top 50 yet. Bravo Pantheon, you earned yourself a participation trophy.

Pantheon There's a micro about to be slammed by three alliances that are around the same size... .guys this is our chance to join the war, go go go go!!!

Its cute to be honest, So many alliances thought we was a threat

Don't think many new alliances are prepared for the #5 Alliance to hit them ?