Hodor

Hodor!

Which I would say was the issue. I think that long wars really have only one scope and it is cutting your opponent down to size through a thorough beating. This tends to have a humiliating effect which then incentives the war dragging out for issues of pride and/or the hope that the loser can somehow flip the damage or cut the deficit as they reach a point of having nothing to lose. Shorter wars with limited scopes are less toxic, albeit perhaps less satisfying, because you'll always exit knowing more damage could've been done, but also the knowledge that the next war will come quicker.

huh, so I guess if you kick Fark nicely enough they wake up. Welcome to the forums, Fark!

Bruh I been pushing for limited scope, limited duration wars for too long... it just doesn't fly in this game, which is a damn shame.

This is too much to read, but, like, my 2 cents, who the frick enters an offensive war without first shoring up support to give them the best chance at victory? You're not reallllly a badass if you enter aggressive wars consistently knowing you'll lose... you're just stupid and should probably let someone else run your alliance. That goes for literally everyone TGH included.

Yes we can argue, or rather debate, but to say Leo simply points anything out is disingenuous. He flails and squeals like every post is the boogy man with the worst intentions. The only person that got worked up prior to me was Leo. KT and TGH literally get boners talking about boring shit like the merits of various strength indicators in game. But if someone loses their shit and acts like a child when Keegoz says one word and Theo posts one graph. Well your debate ends there man. temper tantrum is a bad analogy, I think it’s more delusion and paranoia...

You are literally the worst fricking public face of an alliance. This thread is proof. You are taking the most absurdly defensive stance in reaction to a graph that shows the breakdown of nations by tiering, with only one comment which is an abbreviated methodology. Literally any life-form with 2 brain cells to rub together could have engaged with that information in a more rational manner. frick man. I just defended fricking Kastor.

yay

I keep thinking to myself, surely Noctis being an official BK diplomat is some sadistic April Fool's gag that's overstayed it's visit, but the nightmare continues. Anyways, this is a good step in the right direction. Now, NPO, drop fake Polaris.

Might as well join this train. I am pretty chill with this as long the promise of dynamism is met, as I see it right now t$ and NPO still have way too many auxiliary ties between the two of them, a lot can be said by just looking at the treaty map now. It looks a lot less like the original "@Prefontaine plan" (trademarked) and more like the less risky, less cooperative form that shifts hegemony from one of the prior poles to the other. For reference:

In my town they have a saying, "don't bet against a well-endowed halfwit or they'll drag you down to their level and beat you with their cocknugget" @micros ally me

it's actually bullshit, I've wanted to roll KT for months and now they won't feel the sting of our betrayal as deeply as I'd have liked, guess we need to sign 12 more MDPs and wait another year... I'm coming for you !@#$s

Thank the lord. Don't stop.

lol. It's easy to walk around big dick swingin when your #1 ranked ally treats all its ties as non-chaining and protects your ass from any aggressive action.

Don't you dare drag me into this shitstorm.