Hodor

Is the determination of victory by net damage calculated as a percentage of total damage?

Okay, here is the thing I don't understand. If a war is clearly one sided, peace is likely to come quicker. You entering to bring balance to the force has actually made it drag because now victory conditions are more nebulous and therefore it'll be a multi month slog before white peace is reached. I've spoken privately with you about the insecurity argument, so I won't comment on that, but this war of words on the forums is not by any means grounded in logic on either side. It's grounded in optics and everyone knows it to varying degrees. You made a move that can be justified in a variety of ways, some valid others not, but what matters is how it looks and it looks bad. You can't argue out of that.

honestly, I wouldn't love you, but you'd get an upvote for a valid point crafted well

Okay, but do stats matter or do they not? 2 days

Yea.... 30 city nations cannot hit 20 cities nations easily. At 28 cities, I was able to hit a 20 and an 18 which both had full mil. All my other wars are within +/-5 cities of me.

For the same reasons the government doesn't spend time proving it's not secretly run by lizard people, 9/11 wasn't an inside job, and chemtrails aren't turning our children gay. BECAUSE IT'S THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yea, yea, we agree, I was just saying we shouldn't factor in strategy to these conditions. Maybe I misunderstood your original statement.

I like that you're trying to do something different with victory/defeat conditions, but introducing strategy as a factor is something that's just not feasible. There are plenty of suicide hits, none of these would be considered victory even though they are strategically significant. Similarly, someone who sits on a nation and does minimal damage, they would possibly receive more damage or result in a draw, but you many would consider that a strategic victory. You can't know intention, so it shouldn't factor into victory conditions in individual wars.

Sorry this was too rich not to contribute I'll take the warn

Don't quote me and cause me to visit a thread where your complaint against me was already addressed literally one mouse scroll above this post. Just do us all a favor and read before you post.

I feel like that math can't be right, but at the same time, am too lazy to calculate.

People are still fighting?.... oh... oh my so much for destroying top tier consolidation™

I resent that I agree, but my pride now prevents me from getting VIP.

Touche. My reading comprehension is at simple minded stable boy level, source of my confusion: 10 Credit Monthly Subscription $39.95 Includes 33 Days VIP & $1,000,000 Each Month FREE!

Also you could just let everyone access it instead of charging $40 a month for a feature that should've been deployed years ago.