Jump to content
Prefonteen

An Announcement from Coalition A Regarding Peace Talks

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Vesemir said:

You must be. Anyone worth their salt recognizes the plea for friendliness from our lord and savior Alex.

You've been here long enough to know where that's from. Shame on you.

Comment did seem kind of ridiculous and hard to take seriously. even if I'm not sure where from. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/23/2019 at 10:56 PM, Tiberius said:

Much like the mental gymnastics of coalition A while they whine about stalling negotiations yet continue jumping through their own manufactured hoops by contacting players who aren't the nominated negotiators and expecting to progress.

Are you a vogon by any chance?

How good is your poetry?

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how many uinvolved alliances would do nothing as the last pockets of resistance fighting the creation of UniPolar World are completely stomped out; as everyone who might have been able to fight on their side are completely eliminated or have crippling terms preventing any actions as the last not allied to the Hegemony are taken out next?

Those who support freedom don't need protection from any major alliances or have anything to fear. There is nothing to fear if doing the right thing. Those who wish to preserve freedom from everywhere on Orbis can join LAN regardless of current sides if they don't trust their own coalition to preserve liberty on Orbis or rather unite around freedom.

Guess we'll find out if this is the moment of truth for Orbis or those who think there will be a next time are to optimistic; if not enough alliances act the potential threat.

This Global War has been interesting at least & original name quite fitting at least. Hasn't been boring. However it doesn't need to end with any tyrannical hegemony emerging.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That sounds reasonable. Now can you get to it so I don't have to pay through the nose for lead?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, namukara said:

That sounds reasonable. Now can you get to it so I don't have to pay through the nose for lead?

Complain to Coalition B, specifically BK and NPO for holding things up.

  • Upvote 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Filmore said:

Complain to Coalition B, specifically BK and NPO for holding things up.

I’n sure your Complaints & Grievances will mean a lot.

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Hodor said:

Snio

@Shadowthrone What about Partisan's post made you downvote it? What is there in that post to disapprove of?

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Thalmor said:

@Shadowthrone What about Partisan's post made you downvote it? What is there in that post to disapprove of?

Umm cmon, you know what is wrong with Partisan's post. it's logical, reasonable and not at all vague. How can anyone not dislike that.

 

Pfft.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Thalmor said:

@Shadowthrone What about Partisan's post made you downvote it? What is there in that post to disapprove of?

A reasonable way to negotiate peace

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Filmore said:

A reasonable way to negotiate peace

You see I have a theory. Coalition B is not being malicious, they merely themselves only have the ability to consider one item at a time, it's why TKR is the only member of our coalition, why they cannot read Partisan's posts in their entirety, and why when they get it in their mind to downvote, by golly will they downvote!

This is all just a grievous misunderstanding.

Edited by Hodor
  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A perception from Coalition A was NPO attacking to defend BK would be such hard evidence IQ still existed, NPO would be finished if they did it next war. They thought it would be bad enough NPO wouldn't get involved. Although NPO doesn't need to give their perceived enemies a chance to build up with peace.

I'll believe in peace when I actually see it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just show all their members this thread.  We’ll see how it’s rationalized.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Buorhann said:

Just show all their members this thread.  We’ll see how it’s rationalized.

Winning is how it would be rationalized, what happens to everyone in Coalition B in the case of failure this war?

Do they really have an alternative even if they don't know NPO/GOONS endgame here & suspicious of it? Is there any way for NPO to come back from this?

I'm thinking those would be on their consideration list.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, slow down. Theres too many Roqbots to downvote and KERCHTOG members to upvote.image.png.c1af936cd3094cf2d3257e56be00dea4.png

take it easy.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/26/2019 at 3:11 PM, Hodor said:

Partisan: Thoughtful proposal, neutral tone, open ended conclusion allowing room for dialogue.

NPO:

2019-11-26-0908.png

Way to make them double down HODOR.

 

unknown.png?width=1240&height=613

  • Haha 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/26/2019 at 7:39 AM, True King said:

I’n sure your Complaints & Grievances will mean a lot.

Ha.  I see what you did there. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Buorhann said:

Just show all their members this thread.  We’ll see how it’s rationalized.

I wasn't aware that they let their non-gov members read any news that they didn't produce themselves.

Edited by Jordan
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would we even need to read OWF after KT and few others declared perma.war few months ago and should total destruction of Colo B  with their rhetorics ?

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, kalev60 said:

Why would we even need to read OWF after KT and few others declared perma.war few months ago and should total destruction of Colo B  with their rhetorics ?

Oh boy, man, you have some massive catching up to do, unless of course we've just come full circle and we're gonna bring up arguments that have already been addressed months ago?

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.