Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Prefonteen last won the day on February 24

Prefonteen had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

4651 God of Likes

About Prefonteen

  • Rank
    Exalted Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Alliance Pip
    The Syndicate
  • Leader Name
  • Nation Name
  • Nation ID
  • Alliance Name

Recent Profile Visitors

4544 profile views
  1. Prefonteen

    The Ayyslamic Caliphate posts

    Gracefully accepted. I look forward to leveraging our newfound protector for the good of Orbis. The sphere lives.
  2. Prefonteen

    Breaking News from the Shifty News Network

    We are not amused, are we
  3. Prefonteen

    Pantheon is back in the game :D

    lol. If you have a problem with me on a personal level you're free to find me on discord.
  4. Prefonteen

    Pantheon is back in the game :D

    As Chaunce has already covered the power structure of t$ as it stands, I won't delve into that. Mistakes happen. No worries :). Lairah, I do understand your perception of my comments and the discussion which took place between myself and TGH. I'll happily explain myself; whether you decide to engage in conversation on that is entirely up to you. I'm an old, opinionated dog with a history of controversy- including both huge successes and hilarious failures. My playstyle has always been one which invites controversy: It is what this world turns on and at times the greatest rewards come from taking the biggest risks. Over time i've learned that there are times and places for soft-gloved diplomacy. There are also times places and instances where it makes more sense to simply push back hard on a matter or topic. In my opinion, the other thread (and particularly, the push of certain parties to pin myself and t$ into a position of malicious intent) was such a situation. As a mere deputy I am allowed more liberties on fora such as these due to the lowered weight of my words in comparison to say, Chaunce. I do think you mistake my pushback on what appeared as a clear spin as emotionally driven. You probably don't know me well enough: I love drama, controversy and trolling. It's my sparetime hobby when i'm not doing diplomatic legwork. Sometimes the combination of the two causes confusion, i'll admit ;)). You do take my comment on TGH's irrelevance out of context though- perhaps this is a matter of miscommunication? My comment specifically in the context of the conversation pertained to TGH's rather heavy forum engagement on a topic and situation which had no impact on or relevance to them whatsoever, and given their attempts at pushing a certain narrative, I noted that they were irrelevant to the situation at hand and implied that they had no business meddling in it. Lastly, there is also a long shared history as allies in the past between myself and people such as buorhann. We have worked together/cooperated closely for years in the past, having shared a metric shit tonne of banter. Such history tends to lead to more.. direct communication when disagreements do occur. In our case, we find ourselves disagreeing on a few issues. That happens. You've seen a flare up over it. Not a very big deal in my opinion :). I hope this clears a few things up on my end. I'm always open to an honest if you feel inclined. I tend to idle in t$' discord channels.
  5. Prefonteen

    Pantheon is back in the game :D

    Excuse me? tS has been clear on its stance, which goed no further than protection for what remains of Pantheon. Ive been trying rather hard not to turn this into a tS vs tCW thing and chaunce moreso. The majority of supposed "slander" on our end stems from certain people trying to put words in our mouth. Feel free to reread the posts. TGH for as far as i know has nothing to do with this, though they seem very intent on making it about them :p.
  6. Prefonteen

    Pantheon is back in the game :D

    Care for a game of chess?
  7. Prefonteen

    Live from Baghdad-Shifty News Network Reporting in

    See if you had followed the timeline even broadly you'd have answered your own question- t$ had no access to the posted screens until after protection was granted. At the same time however, we're not going to suddenly revoke our protection over it because what happens between old gov and new gov is an internal matter: It is irrelevant to the necessity for Pantheon to have a degree of protection while it sorts out its issues. As for instability/source of instability: That's kind of incorrect since as I understand, this is not a matter of an alliance randomly being couped. Rather, this current instability comes at the heel of an attempted merger in which some might want to stay and others might want to go. I again do not see what point you are trying to make. Or are we arguing for argument's sake?
  8. Prefonteen

    Live from Baghdad-Shifty News Network Reporting in

    Ehm... why are you triumphantly presenting that screen cap (which as you stated was already public) as some new revelation which I supposedly missed, and why is that apparent revelation relevant to my comments? My point dear hippo, is that you are trying awfully hard to spin a narrative against tS an (and moreso me). Your vague warning was noted but ultimately you provided me with no evidence or background because (and I paraphrase you here) "I am not going to do your work for you". We've looked into it and come to our own conclusions on what to do as a result. Whether those are the right conclusions- only time will tell. Clearly tS protecting Pantheon goes against your interests. That's a you problem. Not an us problem. You can call what we are doing a passive endorsement, shortsighted or whatever else you want: It changes nothing to the situation at hand- which is that tS will facilitate Pant members to make their own choice by providing protection from any opportunism. I'm not entirely sure what your problem with that approach is (because frankly, there are huge differences with your VE analogy that make the connection impossible to draw)? I'll also note -again- that you came stumbling into this thread yelling random shit on your own volition. That wasn't Partisan-incited ;). Considering that and your general handling of this thread i'm going to give your offer of consultancy a pass: Something tells me the return on our investment would be negligible.
  9. Prefonteen

    Live from Baghdad-Shifty News Network Reporting in

    It's funny. The more TGH posts, the more likely it seems that they have some stake in seeing tCW/Pant/tS/TKR escalate. Tough luck boys. You're irrelevant.
  10. Prefonteen

    Live from Baghdad-Shifty News Network Reporting in

    >mfw you are trying so hard to pin someone that you're equating a surprised reaction at your overhyped "grievances" being a lot less severe than anticipated to a complete dismissal of an entire grouping in a political dispute. Jesus you're bad at this.
  11. Prefonteen

    Live from Baghdad-Shifty News Network Reporting in

    Considering that entire chan was one shitstorm of spam and half the server got deleted...no, I did not pay particular attention to it. My apologies for not wading through hours of drivel. ....so all this is about a few discord kicks?
  12. Prefonteen

    Live from Baghdad-Shifty News Network Reporting in

    I mean. You're making a claim and telling me to prove the contrary with logs. That's not how making a claim works. Hence why it'd make more sense for you to give me what you have to substantiate your claim. And yeah. You just keep showing up in this thread harping on us protecting Pant. For a party which had nothing to do with the protection or the drama that' leaves me wondering if there is a hidden agenda? Heh. Fair distinction. I figured "bad by association" would work ;). Thusfar though, I haven't seen a whole lot to substantiate the claim. Perhaps someone will drop those supposedly super important and damning logs at my door one day...
  13. Prefonteen

    Live from Baghdad-Shifty News Network Reporting in

    Why don't you show me the logs that supposedly prove we're the bad guys? . You seem awfully invested in this though. If you wanted a different outcome you should've protected Panth or tCW yourself.
  14. Prefonteen

    Live from Baghdad-Shifty News Network Reporting in

    You realize that the "facts" you've noted down (which are.. very few and do not encompass the full picture) are disputed by the other side, yes? Side one claims A. Side two claims B. It's not up to me to make judgement, nor am I going to continue this argument with you on the OWF. I'm happy to discuss it in query if you feel the need.
  15. Prefonteen

    Live from Baghdad-Shifty News Network Reporting in

    You should reread my posts then. As for yesterday's dumbshit; That was yet another example of you interjecting in what was a far less serious conversation than what you make it out to be- a convo in which you initially weren't even involved- I was literally ribbing Kastor of all people. Kind of like this thread where thrax' initial comment wasn't even directed at you in particular ;). Unless you are currently meddling in Pantheon's affairs? Uhhh... FA of the Syndicate vaguely justifying "the coup"? What you mean is "FA of the Syndicate stating that it's a grey area with both sides claiming ownership, and opting to take care of the FA protection". There's a difference. Other than that you're fairly on point I think?

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.