To quote ava in full:
This was in reference to the sloppy entry by the tS guys: They were lazy in their executions because they knew they could get away with it. That has nothing to do with "hitting because we saw an opportunity", as you attributed to us. Bad kastor. Bad argument.
In context, ava's "fair fight" quote is clearly an address to the complaint that tS' entry was seen/felt as "unfair". He poses that a fair fight would have been a straight 1v1 offer. Such an agreement would have negated the risk of outside interference. This has nothing to do with tS' motivation. The point is also correct: They could have avoided being hit by outsiders by offering it. Now you could argue that it wouldn't have been accepted, but you won't know unless you try. In either case, it's irrelevant to the point holding ground.
Regarding the last bit of your point: The subject of what tS' motivations were was not even the topic at hand until you pissed yourself trying to gloriously interject and out-debate ava. Ava's comments did not touch on tS' motivations: You made it about that, and inserted your *own* guesswork on why we may or may have not entered. I called you on that in my initial post and told you you could simply ask us.
...And now you respond by trying to flip that by saying Ava is BS-ing irrelevant points in a conversation which is not even about the points you are trying to make (are you even trying to make one?). Me calling you on that is not akin to me "trying to distract from the conversation" as I called for you to simply ask me the question.
Why they were hit by tS was not the topic of the conversation, and therefore ava did not need to address it. You can turn that into the topic of conversation if you wish and i'll play ball. But you're better off quitting while you're ahead with the extremely weak attempts at winning a debate which shouldn't even be a debate.