Terms for KETOG

[Epi 3090]

*Looks at title
*Crosses fingers
> Adrienne isn't asked to eat Fish Flakes.
God-bless Goons removed it.

 

So you top the crest which hid you, and

your eyes receive a vision

Of a stretch of rolling downland, while,

with puffs as white as snow,

You can see your shrapnel burst with

mathematical precision,

And you bless the thirteen pounders of

the Cavalry Division

For outlining your objective. You have

half a mile to go.

And the trumpet orders Canter, for no

more the ground may screen you.

A hare gets up in front of you, and lopes

away at large.

A whispering of bullets tells the enemy

has seen you.

Your brother squadron leaders close the

intervals between you

As they take up your direction, and the

line goes down to charge...

Grows the distance ever shorter ’neath

the squadrons’ steady thunder.

But their batteries have found you, and

the men are falling fast.

The rear ranks close the spaces which

the shells have torn asunder;

Some wounded men are carried wide,

and some are trampled under,

As the pace becomes a gallop, to a

screaming trumpet’s blast...

[Do Not Fear Jazz 837]

Just now, MCMaster-095 said:

The "you" was referring to Goons as a whole. And I was unaware being different people means that you get to say whatever you want, regardless of whether it's true or not.

Perhaps you should point to the things GOONS leader(s) are saying and not mid gov? But, I mean, I revert back to my previous post about reading comprehension. 

[MCMaster-095 311]

2 minutes ago, AppealDenied said:

Perhaps you should point to the things GOONS leader(s) are saying and not mid gov? But, I mean, I revert back to my previous post about reading comprehension. 

Well I would advise not directly contradicting what your leaders are saying, especially if you just end up saying to defer to your leaders. Makes for a bad look overall, and looks like you're just making up stuff to say.

[James II 1402]

27 minutes ago, AppealDenied said:

Shark Week does not apply to members of Coalition B.

Then why does it necessitate the additive "These raids cannot be countered." It wouldn't make sense to present coalition B with terms to sign on behalf of all non-involved parties. Furthermore, it implies Pantheon, Fark, WTF, and Immortals will be subject to these raids, which most of us expect IQ to go after down the road anyways. Thank you for the confirmation.

[Sardonic 102]

4 minutes ago, MCMaster-095 said:

Well I would advise not directly contradicting what your leaders are saying, especially if you just end up saying to defer to your leaders. Makes for a bad look overall, and looks like you're just making up stuff to say.

AppealDenied is correct, I misunderstood the scope of the term.  The failure is my own.  Your lectures are misplaced, pubbie scum.

Edited December 2, 2019 by Sardonic

[Prefonteen 10162]

3 minutes ago, Sardonic said:

AppealDenied is correct, I misunderstood the scope of the term.  The failure is my own.  Your lectures are misplaced, pubbie scum.

Your name is familiar. Have we met?

[Sardonic 102]

Just now, Prefonteen said:

Your name is familiar. Have we met?

If it was in a nation or colony simulator, likely.

[MCMaster-095 311]

11 minutes ago, Sardonic said:

AppealDenied is correct, I misunderstood the scope of the term.  The failure is my own.  Your lectures are misplaced, pubbie scum.

Thank you for clearing this misunderstanding up, good sir.

[Leonard J Crabs 285]

how the hell did you not leak the peace terms first? We've been clamoring to know what they were for months.

What kind of professional spy are you.

Edited December 2, 2019 by Leonard J Crabs

[Memph 612]

I remember when Shark Week was still about hitting forum loudmouths and seeing if their alliance had the balls to defend them.

[Do Not Fear Jazz 837]

3 minutes ago, Memph said:

I remember when Shark Week was still about hitting forum loudmouths and seeing if their alliance had the balls to defend them.

Are you the ghost of Christmas' past?

[Spaceman Thrax 3852]

4 hours ago, durmij said:

Since my new role in game is apparently "Context Bot", I want to say something for the umpteenth time. Freedom of speech strictly refers to freedom from government interference in your ability to participate in public spaces. It has absolutely no bearing on a private forum owned by and operated by a LLC. There is nothing comparable between any game action and any real life action by a government. If you object to potential restrictions being place on someone's ability to participate in these forums, and those restrictions aren't being placed by Alex or his employees/agents, feel free to object to them, but your objections should reflect the reality of the situation.

Hey Context Bot! I love your work. Can you help me out? I'm apparently out of the loop on contemporary leftist thought.

Can you use your powers to explain to me how it's okay to selectively police "bad posters" while simultaneously helping an alliance of cheaters/pedophiles/nazis push a term that makes fun of starving Africans?

[AkAk 267]

21 hours ago, Koala said:

After seeing those terms no wonder the war hasn't ended.

This is the first time our side has seen terms 3 and 4 and there's still 6 more that are unknown because they're probably still being written and/or thought about.  

I'm guessing the last 2 or 3 are literally blank placeholders still. 

Edited December 3, 2019 by AkAk

[Shiho Nishizumi 2169]

6 minutes ago, AkAk said:

I'm guessing the last 2 or 3 are literally blank placeholders still. 

Close.

[Aesir 160]

14 minutes ago, Shiho Nishizumi said:

Close.

Can confirm the accuracy of this

[Kastor 2581]

I know what the other terms are and can post them but I can confirm that they are mostly meme terms.

 

all of these terms were voted and approved, the other ones weren’t. I posted those that were approved. 

[durmij 4820]

1 hour ago, Spaceman Thrax said:

Hey Context Bot! I love your work. Can you help me out? I'm apparently out of the loop on contemporary leftist thought.

Can you use your powers to explain to me how it's okay to selectively police "bad posters" while simultaneously helping an alliance of cheaters/pedophiles/nazis push a term that makes fun of starving Africans?

Simple. In game politics always takes precedent over out of game, even if those out of game politics are literally promoting violence against groups based on inborn traits. Same holds true for despicable personal acts. If you can meme or log dump, or have 20+ nations in the right range,  you can get away with a lot, thanks to short memories.

The list of alliances that raised a stink and also put their asses on the line to back it up is limited to TRF (RIP), Kosmo's Fark (RIP), and TKR. Unless I missed something during my 9 month hiatus.

Edited December 3, 2019 by durmij

[Malal 5451]

[Sweeeeet Ronny D 3186]

We can argue about terms till we are blue in the face, but the real outrage should be that not only do people talk to Kastor, but also actually give him sensitive information.  What are you people doing? Are you out of your minds?   I mean seriously Kastor?  

[Charles Bolivar 1054]

I would love to see shark week as much as the next guy but it needs to be at GOONS' own risk and not protected by a term in a clause.

[CitrusK 1123]

14 minutes ago, Sweeeeet Ronny D said:

We can argue about terms till we are blue in the face, but the real outrage should be that not only do people talk to Kastor, but also actually give him sensitive information.  What are you people doing? Are you out of your minds?   I mean seriously Kastor?  

Haven't a clue what you mean.

We should all give leaks to Kastor, so that he can.....

You guys should start leaking to me, and allowing me to get the upvotes. I want the upvotes, they can't all be for Kastor!

[ComradeMilton 24]

10 hours ago, Saxplayer said:

Guess GOONS will never get their Shark Week and Polaris will never get their bank back, what a shame.

Shark Week is not dependent on the peace jazz.

10 hours ago, Saxplayer said:

Move on, end this conflict gracefully, what more do any of us have to gain by dragging out this conflict.

Likewise...

10 hours ago, Saxplayer said:

End the war.

Direct this to CoA's leadership. CoB is willing to discuss this, but this is the thread where they've stopped trying.

3 hours ago, Prefonteen said:

In light of this, the maintenance of confidentiality which your coalition appears to demand (regarding peace talks) is something we can not uphold without seriously harming our own internal stability as well as our external brand. This is primarily due to factually misleading statements made by coalition B officials prior to our post, which frame coalition A as unwilling to come to the table.

CoA can do this. Hell, I can't think of peace negotiations that have ever not been done confidentially and I joined during the Beta.

3 hours ago, Prefonteen said:

I once again implore you and yours to simply meet us, and present the entirety of your terms. We will work with you and walk through them one-by-one. I do not believe this has to be as complicated as it appears to me.

Us implies you're in CoA's group for negotiation. CoA is good to go and begin when they choose to do so. tS seems to be a little delayed, but could still start,

[CandyShi 270]

5 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said:

Direct this to CoA's leadership. CoB is willing to discuss this, but this is the thread where they've stopped trying.

 

Nice propaganda that's blatantly contradicted by the facts.

 

6 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said:

Shark Week is not dependent on the peace jazz.

Why was it one of your peace terms?
 

6 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said:

CoA can do this. Hell, I can't think of peace negotiations that have ever not been done confidentially and I joined during the Beta.

Confidential peace notifications where the opposite party stalls them and blames your coalition?

 

7 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said:

CoA is good to go and begin when they choose to do so.

Again, I feel like you're trying to pretend the past 4 threads on this topic don't exist. 

[Don Juan 341]

12 hours ago, Sardonic said:

Shark Week is a GOONS tradition.

the former ODN from CN me says "that's not nice"...

[ComradeMilton 24]

42 minutes ago, CandyShi said:

Nice propaganda that's blatantly contradicted by the facts.

No, it's not.

42 minutes ago, CandyShi said:

Why was it one of your peace terms?

He only term about it was regarding counters.

42 minutes ago, CandyShi said:

Confidential peace notifications where the opposite party stalls them and blames your coalition?

..when you start posting about them in public....yes

42 minutes ago, CandyShi said:

Again, I feel like you're trying to pretend the past 4 threads on this topic don't exist. 

You're choosing to believe that. Which is fine, but that doesn't make it genuine or accurate.