Jump to content
Kastor

Terms for KETOG

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Sardonic said:

Shark Week is a GOONS tradition.  I would expect nothing less, and nor should anybody else who are living in our world.  I can assure you it will be applied fairly to bad posters of both coalitions.

Countering is a TI tradition. I would expect nothing less, and nor should anybody else who is living in our world. I can assure you it will be applied fairly to raiders from either coalition or none.

 

I.e.

Raid people, get countered. That's how shit works around here.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, durmij said:

Correction to you both, there was a war where NPO wouldn't surrender until a clause saying they did a good job was included.

Don't get me started on that one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, namukara said:

Countering is a TI tradition. I would expect nothing less, and nor should anybody else who is living in our world. I can assure you it will be applied fairly to raiders from either coalition or none.

 

I.e.

Raid people, get countered. That's how shit works around here.

I really hope they try to counter shark week allears.gif.45c5f49d009d6a7004a19b58ff2e72be.gif

e: unless it stupidly reignites this dumb dead and boring war for another 3 months oh god

25 minutes ago, namukara said:

TMC? When did they get involved in this? Do you even know who you talk to, or are you just so used to nobody taking notice of you it's never really mattered before?

We didn't know who they were either until they decided to make a point of being incredibly edgy.

Edited by Marxalot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Sardonic said:

Shark Week is a GOONS tradition.  I would expect nothing less, and nor should anybody else who are living in our world.  I can assure you it will be applied fairly to bad posters of both coalitions.

Uhoh, both coalitions? Lmfao

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Otto Von Bismarck II said:

Uhoh, both coalitions? Lmfao

It would farcical for us to imply that one coalition has a monopoly on bad posting.

E: However in this case because of the nature of the shark week implementation, it will only apply to the losers.

Edited by Sardonic
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Marxalot said:

I really hope they try to counter shark week allears.gif.45c5f49d009d6a7004a19b58ff2e72be.gif

e: unless it stupidly reignites this dumb dead and boring war for another 3 months oh god

We didn't know who they were either until they decided to make a point of being incredibly edgy.

Enlighten us, what is an acceptable response to you deciding to raid a member as part of 'shark week?'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, namukara said:

Enlighten us, what is an acceptable response to you deciding to raid a member as part of 'shark week?'

'Learn from their mistake and post better' is the idea.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sardonic said:

'Learn from their mistake and post better' is the idea.

... Are you taking the piss?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After seeing those terms no wonder the war hasn't ended.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Sardonic said:

and post better

And for those who can’t, stop posting altogether. Or continue, everyone likes feeling better about themselves. Either works. 
 

e: before everyone jumps like a shark on me, I’m really only here  because the terms are hilarious. I’m honestly waiting to see the next 6. 

Edited by Dio Brando
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CandyShi said:

... Are you taking the piss?

Of course not.  This is a serious term, designed to improve the lives of the community at large by reducing forum pollution.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sardonic said:

Of course not.  This is a serious term, designed to improve the lives of the community at large by reducing forum pollution.

I see this and I think “cleansing” or “censorship”. 
 

Insert another Social Darwinist comparison here.

 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Sardonic said:

Of course not.  This is a serious term, designed to improve the lives of the community at large by reducing forum pollution.

I'm sure that there is no possibility that could inspire just a bit of backlash...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, CandyShi said:

I see this and I think “cleansing” or “censorship”. 
 

Insert another Social Darwinist comparison here.

 

Hardly. We are taking nobody's freedom of speech, we could not do so even if we wanted to.  Freedom of speech has never been the same thing as freedom from consequence.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Sardonic said:

Hardly. We are taking nobody's freedom of speech, we could not do so even if we wanted to.  Freedom of speech has never been the same thing as freedom from consequence.

Tell that to the people in China.

Edit: For clarification, by your definition the people in China can say anything they want, but they’ll just end up in a ditch for saying it.

Edited by CandyShi
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, CandyShi said:

>Casually calls people Nazis

>Also in an alliance that complains about people insulting other people.

 

no double standards here.


Just an FYI, an alliance called “Afrika Korps” is in your coalition, go check them out.
 

 

Pretty sure I didn't call anyone anything, bud. But thank you for playing :).

47 minutes ago, ForgotPants said:

Sure man, you clearly are the only one with knowledge of history. Seeing all your highly intellectual and fact based posts here on these forums makes me oh so jealous.

am I supposed to know what this means dude

 

46 minutes ago, namukara said:

TMC? When did they get involved in this? Do you even know who you talk to, or are you just so used to nobody taking notice of you it's never really mattered before?

If you're asking what they have to do with my post, here:

UN0Sw7O.png

If you're asking what they have to do with the war, I suspect about the same as FARK does, right?

7 minutes ago, CandyShi said:

I see this and I think “cleansing” or “censorship”. 
 

Insert another Social Darwinist comparison here.

 

Don't worry, Candy. You barely rank on our list since no one in our alliance save like 3  of us know who you are.

6 minutes ago, CandyShi said:

Tell that to the people in China.

Edit: For clarification, by your definition the people in China can say anything they want, but they’ll just end up in a ditch for saying it.

what the hell does this mean lmao

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd rather keep fighting. This kind of BS backfired for NPO in CN.  History will repeat itself, sooner rather then later I think.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, namukara said:

I read the 12 month NAP as 'we really want a free run at farksphere, you're not allowed to help while we try and push another alliance out of the game.'

They must be hurting worse than I expected if they need that much time to recover and dogpile Farksphere before being ready to fight us again.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since my new role in game is apparently "Context Bot", I want to say something for the umpteenth time. Freedom of speech strictly refers to freedom from government interference in your ability to participate in public spaces. It has absolutely no bearing on a private forum owned by and operated by a LLC. There is nothing comparable between any game action and any real life action by a government. If you object to potential restrictions being place on someone's ability to participate in these forums, and those restrictions aren't being placed by Alex or his employees/agents, feel free to object to them, but your objections should reflect the reality of the situation.

Edited by durmij
Crucial typo
  • Upvote 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Sardonic said:

Hardly. We are taking nobody's freedom of speech, we could not do so even if we wanted to.  Freedom of speech has never been the same thing as freedom from consequence.

Yet you want freedom from consequence for attacking members of other people's alliances.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It has come to my attention that there is a need for those who don't exactly agree with everything within Col B to speak up. And act of good faith is something someone also told me was missing. 

The position we are being put in makes any act of good faith we try to do null. Now whether you believe it's even possible for us to have a heart big enough to do such an act is your own opinion but not everyone in Col B is 100% behind what is being said or done. For one, not a single AAs goal is to fight until disbandment. It's is perceived like this because of no context leaks. Life goes on if it happens but it's not what we want. That is not the goal. At the end of the day for a lot of us, hell, for all of us. Peace is the goal. But increased volume and talks has made it next to impossible to do much. 

The terms that were leaked were never finalized. Infact, the only terms that should even be viewed as official are the first 2 which were the only 2 that were officially presented to KERCGOGG during peace talks. 

On the front of t$ terms in this. At the time these were written the t$ front of things was not being discussed as it was made clear after the first set of Peace talks concludes t$ would have their time in the light. Obviously this isn't the case now but things are ever changing and ever evolving. 

My word is my bond and all we have on this planet is our word. Do with it as you wish but you all wanted an act of good faith. This is all I can offer you.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, REAP3R said:

Yet you want freedom from consequence for attacking members of other people's alliances.

I myself expect to be nuked repeatedly for bad posting unrelated to shark week.

Edited by Sardonic
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.