Jump to content
Lordship

War. War Never Changes.

Recommended Posts

I miss the old BK, straight from OO BK 

The Yoso BK, set on his ayy BK 

I hate the new BK, the IQ BK 

The Comrade Milton BK, spaz in the OWF BK

 I miss the funny BK, making memes BK

 I gotta say, at that time I'd like to treaty BK 

See, I grew up with BK, it wasn't any BKs 

And now I look and look around and there's so many BKs 

I used to love BK, I used to love BK

 I even had the ayy lmao bot, I thought I was BK 

What if BK made a song about BK 

Called "We don’t want a new hegemoney"? Man, that'd be so BK 

That's all it was BK, we still love BK 

And I love you like BK loves BK

My favorite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright I'm bored again. Let's start the next war.

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright I'm bored again. Let's start the next war.

You're paperless, feel free to do something.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll only say two things:

 

1. The 2nd term is quite possibly one of the most stupid terms I've come across; it achieves the exact opposite of what you wished to achieve with that term. It sounds forced, and quite honestly just says, "We were trying to be nice, so we gave a consolation prize to Inq: We won't collectively shit on you."  The wording is also interesting, "[...]can or should be construed as humiliating or degrading[...]". Yes, I'm sure that very sentence doesn't humiliate you further. 

 

2. So then, no clause about Inq' CB being valid?  :P

1. I mean they requested the term, and its fine with me. Not like they need our help, they've done a fine job embarrassing themselves and I'm sure they will continue to do so.

 

2. They had a CB?

Edited by Dr Rush

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. I mean they requested the term, and its fine with me. Not like they our help, they've done a fine job embarrassing themselves and I'm sure they will continue to do so.

 

2. They had a CB?

 

1. That's what I'm saying, though. Dunno what it came off as me saying, but requesting such a term is well, stupid on Inq's part, which was the point I was trying to bring about.

 

2. Exactly. xdxd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

90 day NAP? Why don't you just take a cue from GIO and make it 365?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What do the stats include in the damages done/taken? They seem rather inflated to me. I know our damage dealt/taken is way higher than the infra stats alone (2.6bil:2.8bil stat tracker to 4bil:6bil in yosos). I'm not sure how much cash we'd need to have looted and units destroyed to push the values up billions beyond the base infra damage :P

Edited by Mikey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

90 day NAP? Why don't you just take a cue from GIO and make it 365?

Because giving a full 365 days might give IQ enough time to at least fabricate something resembling a real CB for next war :P

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What do the stats include in the damages done/taken? They seem rather inflated to me. I know our damage dealt/taken is way higher than the infra stats alone (2.6bil:2.8bil stat tracker to 4bil:6bil in yosos). I'm not sure how much cash we'd need to have looted and units destroyed to push the values up billions beyond the base infra damage :P

 

Alliance stats are infra value plus the sum of nation stats. And nation stats are nothing but money looted and unit costs. Which includes everything from the 2$ cost of a soldier to the price of launching a nuke.

Although, the prices used are from halfway through the war, so if you add it up yourself using $1700 steel and $1000 gas etc you'll get a slightly lower value.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only reason this thing lasted as long as it did is because you dinguses wouldn't admit you had lost. That's like literally all we really wanted.

 

Dio is glorious.

 

tumblr_static_tumblr_static_ailgyvpg6u8k

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shit terms are shit. We lost... so what? I forget who said it above but I agree, the second term just makes us look like we need that in writing to make us feel good about ourselves. Honestly, I'm embarrassed that the second term is even in there.

 

Well fought war for everyone who made it to the end. For the alliances that dropped out early, you don't deserve to be our ally or even be associated with any respectable alliance.

 

And before anyone gets butt hurt, just know that I don't care. We put ourselves in this position by surrounding ourselves with alliances we know to be incompetent and I can only hope BK's leadership can get their act together.

 

Okay, back to hibernation. Coup maybe in a month? Idk.

Yeah, the 2nd term is just asking to be made into a meme, which it actually will be an ad in a bit.

 

Best part of not being in this war,

 

the terms don't apply to me :v

Edited by Shifty Stranger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations to the 'easy mode' coalition for another victory, and congratulations to Inquisition and friends for trying something new and giving it their best (particularly NPO and BK, who performed greatly).

 

I wish both sides a speedy rebuild.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally over and time to rebuild for those in range of the actual fighting.

 

Our coalition name is dumb and so is the second term of the peace treaty. A simple "the war is over and IQ lost" would have sufficed. Seems everyone is too tired to spam memes and shitpost and I think that says enough about the war.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, that 2nd term cracked me up when I saw it. 

 

#safespace

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait a second. Never mind. This NAP is actually awesome.

 

I just realized that because it applies only to signatories at this moment, and was signed by Inquisition rather than the entirety of their side, VE isn't covered by it.

 

Either side can hit VE whenever they want, and when they do the other side will not be allowed to counter.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And before anyone gets butt hurt, just know that I don't care. We put ourselves in this position by surrounding ourselves with alliances we know to be incompetent and I can only hope BK's leadership can get their act together.

Okay, back to hibernation. Coup maybe in a month? Idk.

That coup better happen bruh

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Fanag, I'm never too tired to spam or shitpost.

 

maxresdefault.jpg

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

#clapped, easiest war to date fam.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A simple "the war is over and IQ lost" would have sufficed.

 

That is LITERALLY all we wanted from our side, but apparently they thought there was something more sinister behind it.

  • Upvote 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.