Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/11/20 in all areas

  1. Fair enough, they are a micro. Fair enough, they are inexperienced. Perhaps they posted a treaty that is not so significant. However, do they deserve that type of shit from you? No. I find this comment humorous coming from a member of a #75 alliance. You may need some more infra on those cities dude.
    26 points
  2. It's truly awe inspiring to see all the shit slinging here coming from micro brained people themselves. Just because you low gov in a big Alliance, even if it is my ally, don't make you any hotter a turd than you calling these guys out on. And former micro leaders who pass the baton on to Nokia of all people should really not be having much to say about other alliances conduct, yeah? Here's a nice pill to swallow, these guys are experienced, know how to actually run an Alliance, unlike you clown asses, and just need some time with the mechanics. Not only should you be happy to have such people bringing some bloody civility and class to a part of the game you, frankly belong in, but you should call a window repairman for that glass house you just bought, cause I done ordered a truck of gravel and a woodchipper this week. That aside, O levels are basically friendship bracelets. I typically don't care for them. I typically care even less for that nonsense in micros, because micros like to sign all the paper in the world. However, since it's a properly written treaty, I'm with Kev on it. One the simpletons above probably couldn't manage without written instructions and a flow chart. But uh, get nuclear power mate. šŸ˜› Oh and as I'm typing this some assclown from the failure that is Ignis Aternum starts mouthing off. Somebody call Neil de grasse Tyson k spotted a neutron star here. Sit the hell down mate.
    24 points
  3. JOINT ANNOUNCEMENT FROM THE VOID TOUCHED AND THE GLOBAL ALLIANCE AND TREATY ORGANIZATION Optional Defence and Optional Aggression Pact between the Global Alliance and Treaty Organization and The Void Touched Preamble In recognition that the Global Alliance and Treaty Organization and The Void Touched agree to peace, friendship and to grow and support each other as time passes. Article 1 - Non-Aggression No member nation of either signatory alliance may attack a member nation of the other signatory alliance. Any violation of this will result in immediate reparations equivalent to the damages done. Refusal of the violating nation to pay reparations can result in severe punishment from the alliance they are affiliated with, and the reparations will be paid by another nation of the aggressive alliance. Both alliances agree to peace between each other until article 5 has been activated by either signatory. Article 2 - Optional Defense In the event of an attack upon one signatory alliance the other signatory body may come to the defence of the attacked alliance. This is optional and encouraged, but not required. Article 3 ā€“ Optional Aggression If either signatory requests aggressive military it is strongly encouraged for the other signatory to provide what assistance it can, though both parties accept that this is not an obligation. Article 4 - Intelligence Any information picked up by a signatory of one alliance that may contain information leading to hurt/danger towards to their signatory partner must be given to the government of the partner alliance as soon as the information is picked up. Any other information or intelligence picked up by one signatory alliance may be given to the other signatory government, but there is no obligation in this case and it is completely optional. Any privileged information from this relationship may not be shared without the express consent of both parties. Article 5 - Termination This treaty may be cancelled if one of the articles given in this pact is not met or one of the signatories has done something that shows ill-will towards their partner alliance. Unless both alliances agree to termination, there must be a 48 hour notice of cancellation before the termination takes complete effect. Global Alliance and Treaty Organization - Governance Inaugural Assembly Chairman: JMKeynes (JMKeynes#7172) Inaugural Vice-Assembly Chairman: CRV24 (Crv24#3514) Inaugural Minister of Foreign Affairs: ComradeV (ComradeV#6086) Inaugural Minister of Domestic Affairs: Skoriaan (Skoriaan#9981) Inaugural Minister of Defense: Tobi (Tobi#0119) Inaugural Minister of Finance: Armen Yao (Armen#1085) Void Touched Lotus: Luviel Arbiter: Gabe Prime of the Stars and War: Dabigbluewhale Prime of Harmony: HorusLoyalist Prime of Credits: Aaroneus
    21 points
  4. Congrats on the treaty guys. Ignore all the toxic negativity. Half of them couldn't tell their arse from their elbow.
    17 points
  5. You know, when I heard people were shitting on a micro, I figured they were doing something dumb like "publicly announcing we're open to sign treaties" or "spamming Alliance Affairs with a million useless posts" or some shit like that. But, shitting on an O-level? Really? I mean yeah, I think they're useless too (because every alliance has the *option* to do whatever the frick they want) but really guys? This is just fricking stupid. Best of luck GATO. Judging by these people, you aren't the ones that need it.
    16 points
  6. How dare two alliances ratify a treaty on in the subforum specifically assigned for such political announcements. šŸ™„ Congratulations on the treaty to both parties. Who are you to determine which alliance can and can not post? Get a grip.
    15 points
  7. Congratulations to GATO and VT good to see my kids working together. As for the rest of the toxic Brady bunch need I remind you this forum is called Alliance Affairs. It is not called Top 50 Alliance Affairs nor is it called micro affairs, you do not get to dictate which Alliances posts here. If you feel so strongly about it you can file it in the idgas inbox.
    15 points
  8. For civility sake. We wont be disbanding. We will not bow to comments such as that.
    15 points
  9. I love how every single comment that expresses slightly negative opinions towards GATO has a downvote from Jarrett. Fight the good fight Jarrett
    14 points
  10. Iā€™m a bit confused why a protectorate is signing treaties šŸ˜• Isnā€™t the point of a protectorate to learn the game and be protected by their protector until they can be on their own (IE: be sovereign)? After protectorate-hood, sign away. In the meantime....why? Best of luck regardless. Nice folks in both alliances.
    12 points
  11. Wow. Imagine being so insecure that you have to post toxic messages towards two alliances posting a treaty declaring their friendship and willingness to work not only with their protector, but also each other going forward. Wow you sure showed them. šŸ™„ Congratulations to my protectorates. ā¤ļø You guys are both wonderful, and I am beyond thrilled to see this posted and to see what you guys do moving forward.
    9 points
  12. It wasn't long ago that we were a micro like you. Best of luck with your alliances and treaty.
    8 points
  13. Coming from the guy that had to make this thread, this comment is hysterical. What an utter failure you are.
    8 points
  14. Glad to be working with ya folks! :D And to the peeps above, hey, you cared enough to comment on it. Good enough for me.
    8 points
  15. Congratulations on the treaty! This might have been a rough first post, but know that not the entire community is comprised of these kinds of people. These people are incapable of finding their own arse in the dark with the aid of a map, a flashlight, and written instructions. Best of luck going forward.
    7 points
  16. On a scale of 1 to 10, how likely are either of you to assist the other in case a real big alliance hit the other
    7 points
  17. Yā€™all gotta chill with this fricking toxic gatekeeping and let them play the goddamn game they want to play. If you canā€™t keep your mouth shut about two micros writing a treaty on alliance affairs, just donā€™t read it. As for the two signatories of this treaty, great job guys, as an ex micro coowner itā€™s really great seeing others make their affairs known to the public with evidently explosive success. I donā€™t think I need to tell you to ignore the dumbasses in the comments who are telling yā€™all to disband or whatever, but Iā€™ll tell you to stay in there! The world of micros is volatile but you canā€™t be afraid to have a little fun and take a few risks. Happy to see this stuff on the forums
    6 points
  18. @Lury Your unrelenting love and support is appreciated
    6 points
  19. Pretty silly indeed. You both have bright futures. I would say that the community has changed as a whole. You donā€™t see alliance leaders that were as toxic as the IQ bunch. I would keep giving these forums a chance. Granted, You have your edgelords (which is bound to happen when teenagers are here on Orbis among us.) The good thing is is that they are easy enough to identify and ignore. Looking forward to seeing VT and GATO graduating from prot status soon šŸ™‚
    5 points
  20. 5 points
  21. Gotta love Lury, Minesome, and Nucleus of all people shitting on a micro treaty. Is it a huge deal? No. But both of these alliances are on the upper end of the spectrum for micros, and the response by some community members is just despicable.
    5 points
  22. At what throwing stones while sitting in a glass house.
    5 points
  23. I like~ That said, if you're gonna declare war on the world... get yourself some combat projects. Like a missile launch pad. You'll really need it.
    5 points
  24. Iā€™m late to this shit-show, but nicely written treaty, well done! It seems a lot of people get so use to regurgitating ā€œMicro, bad!ā€ that they forget how to actually discern the good micros from the bad micros, and go figure most of them end up in the bad ones.
    4 points
  25. This thread has had a nice flow, first we had the backlash, then we had a backlash to the backlash, the next question will be when does the backlash to the backlash's blacklash begin?
    4 points
  26. Literally no one cares about your shitty little micro and your stupid secret societies. Come talk to us when you do something that's actually relevant. Your builds are complete and utter garbage; you should try going to an actual alliance who knows what they're doing. Disband immediately.
    4 points
  27. BK has stabbed TKR, and CotL set an explosive off and killed Acadia and The Ampersand. @Leftbehind@Kiloist II@HannaH That's what you guys get for leaving
    4 points
  28. micros signing treaties. smh disband and join e404
    4 points
  29. Good thing I actually like this song, since it's been in my head since all the little toxic assclowns had to do their jobs to amuse most of us this morning. Kinda sad the even with all the toxic douches who got kicked from "IQ Leadership" that we would have to still be stuck with these garbage humans. Anyway, congrats to our Prots VT and GATO, damn fine work guys.
    3 points
  30. I'm not like those other girls micros. Please date sign me. Edit: for clarification, that's a shot at the gang of idiots who are incredibly emotionally invested in the purity of this subforum. Congrats to the parties involved.
    3 points
  31. Wow. Gotta love the standard P&W toxicity on display here. Smh šŸ¤¦šŸ»ā€ā™‚ļø
    3 points
  32. Nobody gives a damn about O level treaties. Also, nobody gives a damn about micro treaties. Also, your alliances builds are ass. Disband.
    3 points
  33. When ur alliance too poor you have to use oil. Join E404 we will give you a good build.
    3 points
  34. Hey @JMKeynes. Your cities aren't powered. Probs should get a handle on that, and then reply to troll comments on this thread.
    3 points
  35. nah dude 5 barracks/city and one lonely drydock is enough for that
    3 points
  36. Not only are they signing treaties, but they're signing ODoAP treaties.
    3 points
  37. First of all, who posts about an ODoAP? And second of all, micros dont post treaties on forums...
    3 points
  38. This is pure garbage and I keep reading it anyway.
    3 points
  39. 1. Right now, there are two buttons (2k and 20k) that allow you to increase your players' stats. Could we have a button that would merely 100 that stat? Perhaps make it a pure 0.25x gain since the range is 0.15 to 0.35? Implementing this suggestion would reduce the number of clicking necessary to get a player to 100, which could make the game a little less cumbersome. edit: I want to be clear, that I'm not advocating the removal of the two existing buttons, but instead suggesting the inclusion of a third "max" button. 2. Allow those who have donated for a custom baseball logo also to have a custom stadium image? Rolling out this suggestion would be along the same lines as the City Headers that are customisation through VIP but would be pegged instead of "team customisation" which comes through the logo change donation. This customisation could make donating for a more customisation team more attractive. Perhaps also allow players to upload their team jerseys or at the minimum a minimum allow them to configure customised hex colourings? 3. Auto-hide the blow-by-blow table that shows how the game went. While a lot of folks may find that enjoyable, some don't need to see the granular details and instead only want to know the final results. Alternatively, relocate the play next game to above that table. 4. Change the current random challenge to instead allow players to set a random bounty on the challenge. For example, if I wanted to set a 100k wager on a random challenge, then some random challenger would be able to automatically play against me and one of us would win that money. This would make it easier to play challenge games and also make it more fun for folks who want a more random chance.
    2 points
  40. Well, his experience is with dying carcasses. That's the perpetual state of his alliances.
    2 points
  41. 2 points
  42. Congrats GATO, good to see you folks making progress!
    2 points
  43. Iā€™m more concerned that Polaris is delusional enough to think about winning....
    2 points
  44. Polaris killing KT really is something that could only happen in a game based completely on RNG.
    2 points
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.