Jump to content

Majima Goro

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Majima Goro last won the day on July 3

Majima Goro had the most liked content!


  • Member Title
    Warned by Sheepy

Profile Information

  • Leader Name
    Goro Majima
  • Nation Name
    Mad Dog of Shimano
  • Nation ID
  • Alliance Name

Contact Methods

  • Discord Name: No, you shall not get my discord name

Recent Profile Visitors

3988 profile views

Majima Goro's Achievements

Exalted Member

Exalted Member (7/8)



  1. Removing war will fix all faults in war mechanics
  2. Never forget! KT and their war crimes!
  3. But you MADE them do it so you literally are at fault here.
  4. Looks like this Alan character is going to get a visit from someone
  5. Time to unleash the micro BABAI on your coalition!
  6. This already does happen. You can keep buying soldiers and suiciding them without munitions to kill tanks. Blockades are a problem yes although maybe having blockades being auto-broken every say 6-12 turns isn't an option, atleast not one I believe will be a popular one.
  7. I have no idea what your point is. I'm talking in a numbers perspective that the number of kills for any city remains a constant, be it in defensive or offensive wars. I'm not saying I'm going to use c10s cs c100s. I'm saying that the entire bs about squaring and applying percentages to make it seem like a c40 v c35 matchup is a extremely one-sided battle is unnecessary and in fact, extremely false. A c35 hitting a c40 is a close matchup. Infra here is an unnecessary thing to bring up since the c35 could have more infra or even infra with the c40. As for experience, that is also a non-factor. In most wars, the first hits are coordinated by milcom. Be it a c35 or a c7, they are expected to listen to milcom when they hit. Also, 3 c35s hitting a c40 with airstrikes is going to kill a shit ton of planes on the c40. Unless they were online to strike back first, the c40 would be extremely dead. Your entire point tbh should be that the game is too incompetent these days and Alex should make it easier for incompetentence to win if they have more numbers. Again, this topic is meant to discuss how to make it such that losing nations can fight back better or get better time to get ready. If you want to discuss about secret treaties, then you should make a new topic. Secret treaties aren't gameplay mechanics, they are a failure of FA
  8. Updeccing literally *is* supposed to be costly. Also percentages aren't a good stat at all times. Pure numbers might serve as better stats at times as well. Especially since the number of kills in PnW is not related to ratios(percentages) but is related to numbers. If you have a c10 hitting a c100, they would kill same number of planes that they would have against a c50. The causalities too are dependent on how many planes the opponent has. FunFact: The highest city updecc where you would kill equal or more planes than you lose is 1.35x your city. This means a c30 can hit a c40 and take out planes equal to or more than he'd lose. 3 c30s working together can hence take down a c40 such that the c40 loses 3x the planes the c30s individually do.
  9. BABAI approves of this post Pro tip: If you are easily offended, do not join. If you can't handle people with differing views from you, do not join. If you aren't based, do not join.
  10. Man this thing reminds me of NPO-BK(coalition) kek-hitting people who peaced out. Guess old habits die hard lol.
  11. Is this like a new way to raid or smth? Like just do a DoW on the forum asking for a 1v1 and get no counters? God damn you guys are real intelligent!
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.