Vein

Congrats on the promotion

Max out your spies, Smh. Making me do IA for your alliance

can we have a radio show where TKR and singularity goes at it while the rest spectates? Thanks

I don't believe a newer player joining the game seeing cities being cheaper would convince them of staying, you have the right mindset in wanting to see the game grow in numbers, most of us do, however, I believe you're taking the wrong path here. If anything, it would upset most of the current playerbase the game has left now who has put in the effort to be where they are now. There is a better way to go about it when it comes to growing the game and this is not it imo. I understand your worries regarding the games growth and it's not really helpful when alex himself seems to have lost the motivation for it. But this will do more bad than good imo and it will definitely not make a difference when it comes to the game growing, but instead, hurt the current playerbase more who have sticked around for years. Lets not lose them as well lol. I don't usually comment on any of these so this is actually a first from me, but this was quite concering to me. It's not a long term solution, there are better ways to go about it. I'd agree with the city cap itself, but the moving city cost is something i'll disagree with.

I wouldn't mind a city cap, for instance the max city as of now being 65 and as the game progress we could move it up to 70 in the future depending on how many c65s we'd have in the game, however, I don't like the idea of making lower cities cheaper than what they'd usually be, same for the higher up cities being more expensive that what it should be, I understand the idea of wanting to make it more friendly to the new players joining the game, but i think thats the least of our concern atm, the biggest concern is the lack of new players itself and i don't believe that would fix that problem.

Congrats on your new position

my condolences

Not sure why that happened, but it’s fixed now

First off, thank you for creating a RoH specifically for us. However, after one week, this is the best you could come up with? Playing the victim card, really? 😂 Are you trying to convince yourself or your members? Because it's clear that the rest of Orbis isn't buying it, and history speaks for itself. Let’s take a look at Rose's CB from their latest 3 offensive wars. - Darkest hour - Rose accusing Eclipse of backroom dealings with Aurora pointed at rolling Florida, without any concrete evidence shared. - One day war - «T$’s backroom dealings & hegemonic sphere creation « - Darkest Hour Deux - CB not found You had no issues with it back then, but suddenly now that you’re on the other end you end up having issues with it? Quite hypocritical don’t you think? Or are you going to put that blame on someone else as well 😂😂 Have you ever taken a step back and thought about why people have criticized your alliance and past moves? Yet you still are delusional and to this very day instead of taking responsibility, you pretend to be the victim trying to push the blame to others. It’s funny how you’re mentioning sphere and number size. That argument is hypocritical in all aspects due to the past. We used to be allies at one point (Ouroboros) being the biggest sphere in the game and we were both fine with that. We could also mention Celestial and Hollestial which Rose was apart from and were the biggest sphere by far, and once again, Rose was fine with it. However, now that it’s not the case you find the will to try to be some sort of hero? Miss me with that bullshit. But if we go back to the original point: numbers. When was the last time you fought an even offensive war? All of your prior wars have been with the intention of dogpiling your opponent and minimizing damages taken, yet you wish to talk about Numbers? 🤦‍♂️ Rose’s last 3 offensive wars: Despite signing the no NAP movement, you didn't even last 6 months before going back to signing naps after NAPs. Unlike you, Eclipse did not sign anything nor did we feel like we had to follow like sheep for some PR points. Is that all your word means? Even before the no NAP agreement, Rose relied on blanket NAPs over doing actual FA to make sure that they wouldn't get hit by their former coalition partners after Duck Hunt and Brawlywood, beginning the “stagnation” of the FA meta. Back to the point, you are accusing Eclipse of being responsible of what you seem to call the “nap cycling” meta. You argue that Eclipse’s FA strategy shaped and orchestrated this meta. First, we are not responsible for what you’re attempting to describe. NAPs and “strategies” around them have always existed, before Eclipse even existed, way before. Secondly, our FA and moves are not solely centered around NAPs all the time and we are certainly not the sole responsible for it like you’re trying to claim so innocently and naively. At the end of the day if Eclipse ends up having a better winrate than Rose, have you simply considered that, maybe, we were just better than you ? The one-day war that you cited is a good example of us not always relying on the nap cycles. Because unlike Rose, we do not need to set up dogpile situations during nap time (you are doing exactly the same) all the time to win our wars and limit damages taken. Did you forget that you linked up with TKR/Grumpy to dogpile SAIL in the one day war with the intention of dogpiling Eclipse afterwards or does Rose genuinely believe they’re the victim here. Do you still not see the issue? You ended up still being able to dogpile them in August either way, so not much difference for Rose at the end of the day … till today. The hypocrisy is staggering from Rose. Overall, I'm quite disappointed by the self-pitying tone in your RoH. Given your size and long-standing position as the #1 AA in the game, you can do better.

Good fights everyone, It's farming season

Growth and FA wise TI has done great, hate them if you want, but avoiding a rolling for a straight year+ is impressive. They'll only really have to improve their MA front and if they manage do that they'll rise back up fairly quick. Also give them a break, their first war in a long time was against Welp which arguably has one of the most competent MA's in the game currently.

Sounds like a good idea, the game has progressed alot in the past few years and the economy in the game is nowhere near as low as it used to be, both nukes and missile cost should increase at the very least imo.

Hey! I felt the exact same thing when your allies signed MDP treaty with rose just as they blitzed sail! Were you aware of that and what were your thoughts on it? I hope you had the same reaction then😜 Hey friend, It seems like your main issue is with a NAP overall, might you perhaps be interested to take a look at your alliances history? or is this a "damn, this is not healthy for the game! how dare you guys?!", but then again, you wouldn't be in a position to say such things considering TKR's past actions. Also before you say anything else, i'm a NAP enjoyer so do not place your values above mine while hiding behind a false pretext of being health-conscious for the game

Sorry, I should of gotten an MDP treaty with rose & sail & cis instead, this is a huge blunder