Jump to content
Prefonteen

An Announcement from Coalition A Regarding Peace Talks

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Dr James Wilson said:

Wow.  Tell us how you really feel, man. 

If the people who think I'm "toxic" (whatever the hell that means), actually cared if their alliance mates were deleting, they'd do what was necessary to end the war on survivable terms, not extend it to the bitter end.  My conscious is clean.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Prefonteen said:

Can't fulfill terms you haven't been given. How exactly do you see us jumping that hurdle, my knowledgeable and well-intentioned friend?

Clearly we must do whatever they ask without question, my friend. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, George Clooney said:

If the people who think I'm "toxic" (whatever the hell that means), actually cared if their alliance mates were deleting, they'd do what was necessary to end the war on survivable terms, not extend it to the bitter end.  My conscious is clean.

If you have survivable terms that is, as of yet half of the coalition is being held at war. Why you purposely delay the other half and give them all the run around. Do enlighten me how we can surpass this situation almighty wise one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what i have come to expect sadly I hope all sides get peace soon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, George Clooney said:

If the people who think I'm "toxic" (whatever the hell that means), actually cared if their alliance mates were deleting, they'd do what was necessary to end the war on survivable terms, not extend it to the bitter end.  My conscious is clean.

Sorry, didn’t know you didn’t know what toxic means. Try google. Toxic is a group of people who are rude and can't be nice. They are not true to people around them. They need an attitude check. Their personalities are so unappealing its make the people around them suffer and turn rude as well (urban dictionary). Happy your conscious is clean. I hope your conscience is as well.

And yes, I care when a player after 1000+ days deletes. Try the same. And check the posted logs if you think Coa A isn’t trying to end the war.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All this mention of CoA this and CoA that makes me feel like Church of Atom is important. says coa more!

  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, George Clooney said:

If the people who think I'm "toxic" (whatever the hell that means), actually cared if their alliance mates were deleting, they'd do what was necessary to end the war on survivable terms, not extend it to the bitter end.  My conscious is clean.

Put the shovel away.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two things are apparent in this war:

1) Coalition B cannot defeat coalition A in war through military force alone (otherwise the war would be over),

2) Coalition B cannot keep their coalition together over time.

Therefore it stands to reason that it is far more likely Coalition B will implode before they defeat coalition A as things currently stand.  There is no way, after all this war so far, that I would delete to miss that moment!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, James II said:

All this mention of CoA this and CoA that makes me feel like Church of Atom is important. says coa more!

james man good?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Etatsorp said:

Two things are apparent in this war:

1) Coalition B cannot defeat coalition A in war through military force alone (otherwise the war would be over),

2) Coalition B cannot keep their coalition together over time.

Therefore it stands to reason that it is far more likely Coalition B will implode before they defeat coalition A as things currently stand.  There is no way, after all this war so far, that I would delete to miss that moment!!

Then why are you guys trying to surrender? If you read the OP you'll see its about Partisan being given the runaround while trying to surrender.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does any of this matter when BK-NPO have actively shown they can careless about PR? 
 

Not saying this war shouldn’t be over, but what makes you think a forum post will change things?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please don't mind Milton, he's a refugee from the incredibly impoverished BK who we took in out of the goodness of our hearts

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ITT:

 

Coalition A: "We'd like peace, what do you want?"

Coalition B: "MAYBE IF YOU WANTED PEACE THIS MIGHT GO FASTER"

6 minutes ago, JT Jag said:

Please don't mind Milton, he's a refugee from the incredibly impoverished BK who we took in out of the goodness of our hearts

Also, micros get back in their corner, bye now

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Rosey Song said:

ITT:

 

Coalition A: "We'd like peace, what do you want?"

Coalition B: "MAYBE IF YOU WANTED PEACE THIS MIGHT GO FASTER"

Also, micros get back in their corner, bye now

GOONS

Micro

 

Pick one.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Each passing day I regret helping OWR cut BK less and less. Even when we were their ALLIES they were about this level of “help”.

  • Upvote 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Do Not Fear Jazz said:

GOONS

Micro

 

Pick one.

Don't need to, you guys are the definition of a micro.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Rosey Song said:

Don't need to, you guys are the definition of a micro.

How's your losing war going?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, George Clooney said:

I'm trying to figure out how this topic moves you closer to peace.  I'm also trying to figure out how this moves the peace process beyond the constant whining about procedure that has taken place so far.  Of course if you were actually engaged in something called 'negotiations' regarding the terms as they come up, that'd be great, but that's not happening at the moment either.

Evidently, you like the current state of things, and don't want peace.  So be it.  I'm comfortable watching your members delete in frustration (R.I.P. G Nation) and your alliances slowly die.  Are you?

And I'm comfortable sabotaging spending $420k per day sabotaging $5m worth of your tanks while you run negative income and spend 4x as much on gas/ammo as the value of the rubble you're destroying.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Rosey Song said:

How's the riding on the success of your protector going?  You know, like a micro.

*looks at treaties*

 

I dun see protectorate???

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.