Jump to content
Prefonteen

An Announcement from Coalition A Regarding Peace Talks

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Rosey Song said:

It already is, you might want to check again why it was called the 168 day war.

When will Rose act.... hehe. Does the countdown still exist or was it taken down? :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Rosey Song said:

It already is, you might want to check again why it was called the 168 day war.

what is it. i do know why it was called the 168 war, the really ended about 30 days in they were just waiting for rose to make a decision 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, George Clooney said:

I'm trying to figure out how this topic moves you closer to peace.  I'm also trying to figure out how this moves the peace process beyond the constant whining about procedure that has taken place so far.  Of course if you were actually engaged in something called 'negotiations' regarding the terms as they come up, that'd be great, but that's not happening at the moment either.

Evidently, you like the current state of things, and don't want peace.  So be it.  I'm comfortable watching your members delete in frustration (R.I.P. G Nation) and your alliances slowly die.  Are you?

Wow.  Tell us how you really feel, man. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Patrick Stewart said:

Who hurt you? 

Coalition A, why do you think he doesn't want peace.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aren't the Coalition B alliance member counts growing throughout?  I know of none that aren't so we're not very worried about that. If you want to keep fighting that's probably going to work well for B. Will it for A?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You seem a lot more inclined toward log dumps and complaining on the OWF than negotiations.  Maybe spend more time on the latter if that's a genuine desire of yours.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said:

Aren't the Coalition B alliance member counts growing throughout?

Arrgh has now around 600 players

ARRRGHHHH

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said:

You seem a lot more inclined toward log dumps and complaining on the OWF than negotiations.  Maybe spend more time on the latter if that's a genuine desire of yours.

You should get to know our snake friend better. Your supposition that he likes to complain and log dump more than attempting to start a negotiation process for the past 3 weeks is wrong.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said:

You seem a lot more inclined toward log dumps and complaining on the OWF than negotiations.  Maybe spend more time on the latter if that's a genuine desire of yours.

Read more, troll less Comrade and you would know what you’re saying is nonsense.

  • Upvote 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Filmore said:

Obviously you didn't pay attention to the post at all, for his complaint is that he's trying to negotiate for peace but Coalition B is just giving him the run around. Not only that, buts he's also added sufficient logs to back up his claim. So do us a favor and actually bother to read the post before you try to complain about it.

Considering how many people he's messaged (as shown by the logs) and how quick he's been to respond to my questions about the matter, it's safe to say that he's spent enough time on this.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Prefonteen said:

Maybe I wouldn't be forced to seek out the OWF if my alliance and half my coalition had not been deliberately ignored in private channels for 3 weeks. t$ has not been allowed to "negotiate".

You choose to do this. You're not "forced" to post at all. TS needs its own channel from what I've read and if you're not negotiating reasonably or acting like this is an equal negotiation it's quite natural that you might not be receiving responses as quickly as possible. Our representatives are likely waiting for you to be more cooperative before continuing.

2 minutes ago, Filmore said:

Obviously you didn't pay attention to the post at all, for his complaint is that he's trying to negotiate for peace but Coalition B is just giving him the run around. Not only that, buts he's also added sufficient logs to back up his claim. So do us a favor and actually bother to read the post before you try to complain about it.

I read it in full. I explained he log dumped, even. This isn't going to help his side in negotiations at all. Perhaps Coalition B doesn't want its discussions linked so it's stopped responding for that reason when there was a log dump relatively earlier. This certainly isn't going to help anything.

4 minutes ago, Darth Ataxia said:

You should get to know our snake friend better. Your supposition that he likes to complain and log dump more than attempting to start a negotiation process for the past 3 weeks is wrong.

I do.

3 minutes ago, Batavus said:

Read more, troll less Comrade and you would know what you’re saying is nonsense.

I'm not trolling at all. I could, if you like, but that would be useful to establishing peace as a logdump.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How long until the rest of the alliances get drug into this fun/mess/war/game?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Prefonteen said:

There is no merit for us in playing along if there is no desire for peace.

Perhaps that's why they stopped speaking to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ComradeMilton said:

Perhaps that's why they stopped speaking to you.

You’re arguing that it’s Col A’s fault that negotiations aren’t happening in a thread where Col A has given plenty of evidence to the contrary.  How exactly is this the conclusion you’ve come too?

  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said:

Perhaps that's why they stopped speaking to you.

This ain't it, chief.

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said:

You choose to do this. You're not "forced" to post at all. TS needs its own channel from what I've read and if you're not negotiating reasonably or acting like this is an equal negotiation it's quite natural that you might not be receiving responses as quickly as possible. Our representatives are likely waiting for you to be more cooperative before continuing.

I read it in full. I explained he log dumped, even. This isn't going to help his side in negotiations at all. Perhaps Coalition B doesn't want its discussions linked so it's stopped responding for that reason when there was a log dump relatively earlier. This certainly isn't going to help anything.

This is such a terrible way of trying to justify this kafkaesque negotiation.

We've obviously seen in Partisan's post, the logs particularly, about his efforts to try and begin these talks, his attempts being either evaded or trolled. 

As Partisan has repeatedly told you, how does it make it worse, if the talks aren't moving because of this ever-changing maze of demands?  

I'm not sure how you've come about this conclusion.... 

 

Edited by Robert Taber
  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.