Jump to content

Global War Peace Terms - Discussion


Ripper
 Share

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said:

Why would the winning side peace?  There's so little resistance and we could almost farm TKR-and-friends for money and resources indefinitely, depending on how much we may need to sell down to continue getting to them.

You could do that and see that it's not that viable as you think it is over long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Woot said:

Ah, it's the old "Everyone in the coalition submit the terms you want and we'll just forward them all along"

All of the terms submitted have been accepted by all the members of the coalition, while others have been rejected.

Proposed terms that give any kind of military, economy or political advantage after this war never passed through this filter.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ripper said:

All of the terms submitted have been accepted by all the members of the coalition, while others have been rejected.

Proposed terms that give any kind of military, economy or political advantage after this war never passed through this filter.

It's only for six months lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Noctis said:

Personally I think it should just be agreed both sides don’t declare new wars after both sides feel they got enough hits in & neither wants to do terms.

Ok, make the case for why it's essentially a draw.  Math says 'no', but let's hear it.

9 hours ago, Woot said:

Ah, it's the old "Everyone in the coalition submit the terms you want and we'll just forward them all along"

Even if that were true, and it isn't, it'd be helpful if the other side made something resembling a serious counter offer, or even showed up in the formal Discord channel for peace talks.  Perhaps there is something going on in some back channel, but so far as I can see, the slaughter will continue for as long as people remain overly optimistic about their position.  I'm comfortable either way.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guess it's been awhile since some of the people proposing these terms have won a war. They better hope they don't lose one again any time soon. At one point we had some friends on the other side of this one, but that is clearly no longer the case. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Avruch said:

Guess it's been awhile since some of the people proposing these terms have won a war. They better hope they don't lose one again any time soon. At one point we had some friends on the other side of this one, but that is clearly no longer the case. 

I am sure they will be devastated if they have to delete a bot in the future or sign more treaties due to future peace terms. xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think having peace terms for the entire coalition is already wrong

For example I can accept some peace terms with the core of the coalition that attacked us, but if you used this chance to hit our protectorates it's another thing

Single alliances should have separate peace terms

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Micchan said:

I think having peace terms for the entire coalition is already wrong

For example I can accept some peace terms with the core of the coalition that attacked us, but if you used this chance to hit our protectorates it's another thing

Single alliances should have separate peace terms

I have the feeling that I've had this sense of deja vu before.

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Auctor said:

I have the feeling that I've had this sense of deja vu before.

woah deja vu the feeling of woah deja vu the feeling of woah deja vu the feeling of woah deja vu the feeling of woah deja vu the feeling of woah deja vu the feeling of woah deja vu the feeling of woah deja vu the feeling of woah deja vu the feeling of woah deja vu the feeling of woah deja vu the feeling of woah deja vu the feeling of woah deja vu

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Auctor said:

I have the feeling that I've had this sense of deja vu before.

Wheres my money, punk.

1 hour ago, Avruch said:

Guess it's been awhile since some of the people proposing these terms have won a war. They better hope they don't lose one again any time soon. At one point we had some friends on the other side of this one, but that is clearly no longer the case. 

These aren't punitive at all lol. Just because your side wants to protect deserters doesn't make everyone else evil. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kalev60 said:

I don't think it's about wanting to protect VM users, I think it's more about either punishing all of them even on the winning side, or who and how gets to punish their war-dodgers.

It’s literally why peace talks have stalled.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Knowing that certain terms put a bad taste in your opponent's mouth, them not being necessary to achieving IC goals, and proposing them regardless while in a position of power due to the way the war has turned out (and not due to general superlative command of military or economy) is a good way to set a precedent you really don't want to be setting. A position of power granted due to winning a war isn't so tenable, anyway. Just something to consider.

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For anyone that plays/played CN you already know where terms like this are going to lead.

Welcome to CN 2.0.

Congratulations you morons.

 

Everyone already knows who won and who lost, punitive terms won't change that nor will white peace.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Fraggle said:

From The Desk of Uncle Traveling Matt

The Best Nation of Fraggle Rock

UncleTravelingMattFraggle.jpg.e84104cb3db546b2a99dc1099eba7462.jpg

Greetings again Friends!!  This was quick. On the authority of Ripper, I, Uncle Traveling Matt, am taking over this process.

First off...all of what Ripper wrote is out the window.

New Terms: Fraggle gets 85% of all reps.

So our starting point is as follows: Peace for all for the low price of 19 billion cash, 200k Gas, 200 Alum, 200k Uranium.

Wire it all to me. The war is over.

 

Many Hugs

Uncle Traveling Matt

 

6 minutes ago, Ripper said:

Could you pin-point punitive terms?

 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.