Who Me

I have to say, Pantheon can disappear for all I care, it has been a dead alliance for quite a while now but Yui is one of the most liked and respected people in this silly assed game so slandering her is not going to earn you any kind of goodwill with most of Orbis. So good luck getting anyone to believe anything you say after that incredibly stupid faux pas.

Which is more logical, sitting on a home game with 20 other players for 10 minutes waiting for someone else to play away games and making 0 money or playing a few away games to get other people to play away games so you all get a few home games in there as well? You have to give a little to get a lot. It's really not that hard to understand.

And this is when you know you have won the argument. When they can't refute your facts and resort to silly stuff like this. Anyway:

This is what I am seeing from your link? You guys are just upset because you tried to make it seem that IQ is so much bigger than the anti IQ faction by splitting it into several groups instead of combining them together. I never said you were one sphere but you are all anti IQ. Just because they hit allies of Rose doesn't mean they don't also dislike IQ. I know these very simple facts are hard for you to grasp but do try a little harder.

You silly silly child, UPN was aligned and fighting on the opposite side of the war from BK and Mensa was the same, plus you know that pesky superiority clause in the IQ treaty. Nuke Bloc wasn't involved in the last war so there was no treaty conflict, just cowardice on the side of Rose and AIM. Can't let those pixel hugging whales get wrecked now can we?

Silly Lordship, those nations that could hit you guys weren't hitting us at that point, everything in that range we had already killed. They bailed on their allies to preserve their upper tiers.

Everyone absolutely understands why they didn't honor their treaties with the Nuke bloc, if they had, they would have lost on both fronts so they chose the course that would keep their upper tier intact and let their allies burn. In my first post I stated that Sketchy should lump all the anti IQ groups into one so it would more accurately show the true sizes of the opposing sides. It is no secret that IQ would never be fighting any of those groups without some of the others, if not all of them jumping in as well so why not be realistic and make the chart reflect that fact. I know you all understand this but are just going to continue to be the same idiots you always are so carry on with your ignorance. Last time I checked, I wasn't in NPO so you should probably address that with them.

I see, they only honor their treaties when it is convenient for them? Isn't that nice of them.

Sigh, your chart portrays IQ as the big bag boogieman with all the other spheres/groups as smaller, however as the last couple of wars have shown there is a definite IQ - anti IQ split. You can spin your bullshit however you wish but the facts are the facts. Whether TKR and TCW would have joined in the last war or not if they didn't have other things to do I don't know. I do have to give a shoutout to Rose and AIM for totally ignoring their treaties with the Nuke Bloc though. lol

If you really want this to be accurate you should just do an IQ vs Anti IQ chart but that wouldn't fit the agenda you are trying to push that IQ is a threat to the game. Not that said agenda holds up at all when you look at the tiering between the different sides. But you guys have never let facts get in the way of your propaganda before so why start now. lol

Personally, I would only use the embargo on high level teams that never play away games or give tips to those that do. I'm perfectly fine with playing away games against lower level teams as long as I get some home games in return. Unless I catch people playing away games for tips I play a lot more away games than I do home games.

Zoom out the tab/page until you don't have to scroll to click the buttons. How is this any different from people that play on the trade markets all day? Do you want to limit the number of trades people can make as well? You are not forced to play home games, that is a choice. If you only sit there and wait for someone esle to play an away game that is totally on you. Not really, there are several high level teams that do nothing but play home games and never give anything back. They hurt the game more by not playing away games because it makes the people that do play away games stop playing to avoid them. You say that you are new to playing baseball so you don't know all the different ways we have tried to make it fair to all who play. Where we are now is a tip system where the people that play home games send the people that play away games a percentage of their winnings. Unfortunately there are still a lot of people that just play all home games and never send any tips. These people hurt baseball more than anything else as they just take and never give anything back.

I'm not worried about new players making money playing baseball, it doesn't take much of an upgrade for them to be able to pull in 10K per home game. Unless I catch someone running a string of away games I play 2-3 times as many away games per day as I do home games and if I do catch someone doing a bunch of away games I usually send them a percentage of the winnings I make as do others so they do make money, sometimes quite a bit of money.

Why should an established player that has spent the money to upgrade the quality and seating in their stadium split the profits they make with new players that haven't? They already get a lower payout because of the lower level of the new player. No one wants to work for anything any more, they just want everything handed to them without any effort on their part.

What you might want to know is that Leo discussed this with sheepy and was told to post the idea here, so really the one being a troll is you. Not a new thing really.