Kemal Ergenekon Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 Since the hegemoney wants to decide how we play the game can you release an exact guide on who we should ally, how we should build our nations, and what we should do with our free time now that no one cares about this game anymore? Challenge accepted. I will write Kemal's Guide on How To Git Gud, and dedicate it to Steve. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Placentica Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 The Steve-lacks-skill proof doesn't rely on one war. Your stats don't tell the whole story, but close enough. You are a nuker, and somehow never find the room to do anything actually useful or worthwhile. If you always find yourself backed into a corner with no options, consider the possibility that your suckitude extends into strategic planning and leadership. What would've been better for this war? Alpha with 300 nukes in this war or Alpha with 0 nukes and no NRF's? You won't answer this because you know tactically nukes have their place in this game. And you do realize that most of tS's upper tier has a NRF right? You think Alpha was my first alliance? First off, we didn't get so many nukes until I realized your side was going to target us in the most epic amount of butthurt I've ever seen in any games I've played. When Rose/VE dropped us we went into full nuke stockpile mode. Until like 2 days before the war, getting dogpiled was all we thought would happen, but were asked to try conventionally and we were initially successful on Mensa as evidenced by your chart, despite Fark/Alpha being smaller than Mensa. Then ALPHA DOGPILE 2.0 happened. And I was 100% right. Now, I'll educate you on my past, b/c you seem to think I've only been playing 6 months. Did Alpha nuke UPN when we hit him with Guardian? Did Alpha nuke SK when we hit them with a little help from VE? I was even in Guardian fighting conventionally. I was always asked to hit the top alliance's target(s). And I did. You talk tough, but you rely on the dogpile and then act like we are stupid for not being able to defend 3 defensive wars. That is plainly ridiculous. You lost your first war due to losing the political war. It happens. I've picked my allies and I'm happy with them. Even if they lead me into a losing war. I'm not going to be a !@#$ TLF and abandon my allies. Nor am I going to be a Pantheon who sticks by allies who dilberatley let it get rolled because my other allies matter more. Screw that. I'll take the loss every !@#$ time if it means I have to sell out to get a victory like so many alliances have done switching sides. If that makes me bad at politics, I can live with that. Quote Hello! If you don't like this post please go here: https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?app=core&module=usercp&tab=core&area=ignoredusers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 What would've been better is if Alpha/Fark countered important targets and coordinated with all afflicted nations they come to aid. Tell them to double build when you strike, so that there's a chance to come back in the war. Not sit there and complain. That's for another thread though... 1 Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrsPigeon Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 (edited) me rn Edited September 20, 2016 by RoboMonkey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Bolivar Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 What would've been better for this war? Alpha with 300 nukes in this war or Alpha with 0 nukes and no NRF's? You won't answer this because you know tactically nukes have their place in this game. And you do realize that most of tS's upper tier has a NRF right? You think Alpha was my first alliance? First off, we didn't get so many nukes until I realized your side was going to target us in the most epic amount of butthurt I've ever seen in any games I've played. When Rose/VE dropped us we went into full nuke stockpile mode. Until like 2 days before the war, getting dogpiled was all we thought would happen, but were asked to try conventionally and we were initially successful on Mensa as evidenced by your chart, despite Fark/Alpha being smaller than Mensa. Then ALPHA DOGPILE 2.0 happened. And I was 100% right. Now, I'll educate you on my past, b/c you seem to think I've only been playing 6 months. Did Alpha nuke UPN when we hit him with Guardian? Did Alpha nuke SK when we hit them with a little help from VE? I was even in Guardian fighting conventionally. I was always asked to hit the top alliance's target(s). And I did. You talk tough, but you rely on the dogpile and then act like we are stupid for not being able to defend 3 defensive wars. That is plainly ridiculous. You lost your first war due to losing the political war. It happens. I've picked my allies and I'm happy with them. Even if they lead me into a losing war. I'm not going to be a !@#$ TLF and abandon my allies. Nor am I going to be a Pantheon who sticks by allies who dilberatley let it get rolled because my other allies matter more. Screw that. I'll take the loss every !@#$ time if it means I have to sell out to get a victory like so many alliances have done switching sides. If that makes me bad at politics, I can live with that. Common mindset in tS is actually along the lines of "we have these nuke projects that we never use, wish we could swap it but we spent so much $ on it so we will just keep them anyway". I got rid of mine a couple months back, never used it or even had an opportunity where using it was optimal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemal Ergenekon Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 BTW, get your own thread Steve. I am sick and tired of all threads turning into "Steve cries about losing the war." 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Todd Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 BTW, get your own thread Steve. I am sick and tired of all threads turning into "Steve cries about losing the war." Who in the Holy hells is steve? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 Who in the Holy hells is steve? Placentica 1 1 Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
丂ħ̧i̧₣ɫ̵γ͘ ̶™ Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 Nothing is stopping me from funding a super small 5k infra nation some nukes and having it raid and nuke to raise the radiation levels. Too small to get hit. The meek ayy lmaos shall inherit the earth. Low infra per city and we never even get to nuke. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemal Ergenekon Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 Nothing is stopping me from funding a super small 5k infra nation some nukes and having it raid and nuke to raise the radiation levels. Too small to get hit. The meek ayy lmaos shall inherit the earth. Low infra per city and we never even get to nuke. Nothing is stopping the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen to fund a super small 5k nation to build CIA and 60 spies ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
丂ħ̧i̧₣ɫ̵γ͘ ̶™ Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 Nothing is stopping the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen to fund a super small 5k nation to build CIA and 60 spies ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Nice, we can have state funded false flags and terror cells in P/W. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmjohnston Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 Sounds like these nuke hounds need to get better allies. Lest we forget, the "hegemoney" was the one to get attacked. If you couldn't win the war, don't wake the bear. 2 Quote ☾☆ Priest of Dio º¤ø„¤¤º°¨ ø„¸¸„¨ ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸ ¨°º¤ø„¸ GOD EMPEROR DIO BRANDO¨°º¤ø„¸ ¨°º¤ø„¸ DIO BRANDO GOD EMPEROR¨°º¤ø„¸ ¨°º¤ø„¤¤º°¨ ø„¸¸„¨ ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shakyr Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 Sounds like these nuke hounds need to get better allies. Lest we forget, the "hegemoney" was the one to get attacked. If you couldn't win the war, don't wake the bear.They haven't learnt that by now, I doubt they will anytime soon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tali Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 (edited) -removed- Fixed Edited September 27, 2016 by Four FOUR 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Ole Posted September 21, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted September 21, 2016 (edited) You guys like to play up the skill level, but it's really more so about activity and getting people to declare wars. The having people to declare wars is basically what politics is all about. Skill only matters if you have equal sides, and we'll never have a war like that. No one will ever let it happen. In the end, at this point it won't matter, the interest in this game is already starting to drop off. Mensa making topics like these to squash even the smallest chance of damage will only make things worse. You can't really say "nukes are stupid and don't matter" while also saying "nukes are soooo important we need to make a special "league" about destroying them". Can't have it both ways, imo. The irony is Mensa isn't the alliance that will ever take many nukes because they keep their cities small. So not sure why they feel they need to be the hegemonic driving force behind this. If you think declaring war, and winning war is the same thing you've clearly never updeclared... You dont just need activity, you need individual tactical skill, and the leadership needs both strategic skills and the skills to teach the members. Point is, theres a reason that some alliances are better than outhers, and that isnt just about numbers or Even activity. if anyone is interested in learning more about This mindblowing new developments in warfare, feel free to contact me and buy a degree from the secret TEst war college.And no i wont list our sekrit awesome tactics. Edited September 21, 2016 by Ole 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doom Posted September 21, 2016 Share Posted September 21, 2016 If you think declaring war, and winning war is the same thing you've clearly never updeclared... You dont just need activity, you need individual tactical skill, and the leadership needs both strategic skills and the skills to teach the members. Point is, theres a reason that some alliances are better than outhers, and that isnt just about numbers or Even activity. if anyone is interested in learning more about This mindblowing new developments in warfare, feel free to contact me and buy a degree from the secret TEst war college. And no i wont list our sekrit awesome tactics. Your "tactics" smell. Good day sir. Quote All hail Irken All hail the Tallest! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cromstar Posted September 21, 2016 Share Posted September 21, 2016 And no i wont list our sekrit awesome tactics. 1. Git gud 2. Stay gud. 3. ???? 4. PROFIT! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John X Posted September 22, 2016 Share Posted September 22, 2016 I noticed a nation had those icky "nuke" things you don't like and ZERO spies. Feel free to rid the world of this threat. https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=15294 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Betulius Posted September 22, 2016 Share Posted September 22, 2016 I noticed a nation had those icky "nuke" things you don't like and ZERO spies. Feel free to rid the world of this threat. https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=15294 Fewer than half their city count, though. Quote Dec 26 18:48:22 <JacobH[Arrgh]> God your worse the grealind >.> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DragonK Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 Down with the nukes! Seriously seems like a good idea, and should balance out a bit them nuke and food stockpielrs. Well, nuke stockpilers, sicne Arrgh already takes care of people who sell expensive food during war time. XD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diomedes Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 Very Interesting! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LostWorld Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 So it was not radiation but Global WARming? Jeez sheepy you got some jokes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kosmokenny Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 Eenie meenie miney moe, which of you should I make glow? Maybe a new one every day, for your spy shenanigans youll all pay. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apeman Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 Yes we are grave digging.....need somewhere to toss the bodies Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 The amusing thing about this is that it's not who you think it is. At least for the most part. Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.