Jump to content

Placentica

Members
  • Content Count

    1445
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Placentica last won the day on May 23

Placentica had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1344 Upvote King

2 Followers

About Placentica

  • Rank
    Driver of Alpha

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Leader Name
    Placentica
  • Nation Name
    Kangaroo Ocean
  • Nation ID
    583
  • Alliance Name
    Alpha

Recent Profile Visitors

3530 profile views
  1. We might have to go on a Auctor upvote binge again to celebrate this.
  2. This topic should be fun to see all the crying. Congrats guys and thanks for bringing some much needed content and culture change to the forums.
  3. You'd be wise to extricate yourself from this situation you've created for yourself. He didn't have a choice, it was alliance orders. Besides, if you did actually win it by Keno and not some cheat, that's far fricking worse. If you have a problem with the way Alpha does it's own economics and milcom, you can take it up with me.
  4. I think you read Hope's post wrong. She's saying in the *past* they and we've been targetted. But most posts I've seen from Farkers when they are mentioned is that this isn't their war. But I don't want to put words in their mouth. I'm sure they have perfectly fine reasons.
  5. If nothing else, this should cement who was winning the *other* global war when NPO-BK-TC-Cit/etc have that much spare capacity to take on whatever this is. Also, people should make sure they do proper background checks when admitting or protecting members who haven't arranged individual peace after leaving an ongoing war. It's a tactic that's so common here but makes no sense and is asking for problems.
  6. Some players who lose a war will always leave. It's a shame that people don't know that's part of the game, but many will leave at the first L or only fight in wars where they are bandwagoning onto the winning side. In my opinion, these are players who do not make for a good community and aren't a big loss when they leave. I'd like to see a graph of actual players who have left not because of this issue. Or maybe a better way to say that is people leaving on the TC/BK/Cit/NPO side of the web vs. Chaos/KETGG/Rose side. Also, I see a lot of inactive players who have given up fighting and just sitting at zeros until the war ends. Players like this shouldn't be counted as inactive - they are just idling, unwilling to keep fighting, not leaving.
  7. We are not allied to NPO, but thanks for the FA advice. I'll take it very seriously. So how much are the reps you're going to have to pay for attacking BK/TC and losing?
  8. It makes sense that you, and your side in general, don't understand what actual content looks like when you see it.
  9. Prefontaine, you should be enjoying your vacationmode, not troubling yourself with internet games. When you get "back" I'm sure you'll have plenty of time to design your own stat tracker that can track 20+ concurrent mini-wars.
  10. I'm not sure if it's just for PR points "ebil NPO" bullshit, but it sounds like a pretty clear cut case here. Those logs that came out would've been plenty enough of a CB. Extremely poor idea for TFP to flex like that. That's not even getting to the warslot issue. When we fought Oblivion and people were jumping our slots, every single war was a potential problem and dealt with.
  11. Is this a good thread to say that I still like BK and then get raged on because I'm not allowed to have that OOC opinion?
  12. This is an excellent post and since it's from a member in an alliance less connected to the conflict, maybe it will actually be read.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.