Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/02/21 in Posts
-
6 points
-
5 points
-
4 points
-
3 points
-
The global war understander logged on, FA leaders should learn from his wisdom3 points
-
I'd like to see a system in place where the game doesn't crash every single war...3 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
I would like to petition the forum mods to add the word 'hegemony' to the word filter on the basis of spam.2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
gib old war mechanics back, city score 50 or 75 at max instead of 100 pls and ty.2 points
-
1 point
-
ooc: Youtube (for better or worse) actually provides the music many times in the description below (not embedded) Song: Energetic Upbeat Pop Artist: MorningLightMusic Song: Drop Artist: Jesse Kreidel Album: Blackbird (I see WarriorSoul replied. If he beat me to the punch so help me)1 point
-
Some developments regarding this: We had a member start at 4 MAPs, naval once, who did not use the "Attack Again" option but rather exited out, did another naval, exited out, and it still put him at 4 MAPs in the end. So no waiting at 12 MAPs and no "Attack Again" and yet managed to use 12 MAPs in the space of 4. https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=9558851 point
-
Interesting, I concur and understand. It is extremely odd indeed. This also happened when I had more than 2 times my opponent's navy. Granted, it did eventually give me an IT but it required my opponent to have 53 ships to my 150 (opponent is c-11 to my c-10). When my opponent had 71 ships to my 150, it only gave MS still.1 point
-
1 point
-
You're a war dodger, who would *want* to risk resources like that?1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Please see for the math behind why this is the case. You're likely conflating a ">=" with a ">" comparison.1 point
-
1 point
-
Can't blame noobs for doing exactly what the tutorials says and the first step in 99% of simulation games.1 point
-
1 point
-
Although your suggestion makes sense I believe this response from Aiya (below) makes sense as well. If this were to be implemented other economic mechanics would have to be added and balanced.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Whichever Moderator just moved this, an official peace declaration, from alliance affairs to orbis central. You’re an idiot.1 point
-
1 point
-
Everyone trying to bait each other into beige be like: Stolen very legally obtained from Solomon Ben-David1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Don't let sphere size fool you, ROASIS may have a big sword but not the brains to wield it, infact we Hollywood are still clearly the hegemon in terms not being useless at P&W.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
I believe you've mistaken this thread for the old RL picture thread. I would have chosen a more flattering picture if I were you. that one makes you look a bit upset.1 point
-
Can't We Build A System To Make Our $ Double Or More? Can't We Build A System To Make Our Deposits Double Or More? But There Is A Question Where Will Be The Money Come From? Yes, The Money Can Come From The Game Administration.. Or, We Can Make A System Where The Alliance Will Keep A Budget Every Month For The Urgent Needs Or Project Works Of It's Member Nations.. Thanks! Plz Check This Matter.. reference to: https://forum.politicsandwar.com/index.php?/topic/31432-cant-we-build-a-system-to-make-our-double-or-more/1 point
-
1 point