Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/27/18 in all areas

  1. A few weeks ago, in a surprising turn of events, a well known executive of the Multinational Corporation and humanitarian institution 'The $yndicate inc' announced his retirement. Partisan, known for his sneky shenanigans, predisposition for theatrics, and his ingenuity in navigating the business world, was a driving force of the $yndicate's Strategic Planning. His contributions too many to list, we at The $yndicate Corporation give our thanks to him for his service. In his place Hilmes will be taking the wheel as the Executive of Strategic Planning. I have large...so
    16 points
  2. TFW when you have a party at your house and invite a bunch of your friends over but someone steals your TV so you go to your friendly and dependable friend and accuse them and cut them from your life and sucker punch them in the face while that greasy ass snake mofo who is lazy and poor and is always asking you for money is standing there with a shiteating grin that says "I did it and I got away with it". Only after visiting your snake friends house and noticing a TV that looks suspiciously like yours do you realise the gravity of your mistake so you go back to your old friend and grovel askin
    14 points
  3. It has come to my attention, that we here at Bad Company, never officially apologized to Kevanovia, for mistakenly believing the lies Cynic had spread about him, and we ended up believing, simply because we were duped. I had told Kev an apology would be included in the Peace Agreement, in one of the comments, and I forgot. Kev.......myself and the rest of BC Gov is very sorry for how things played out, and for believing the lies and shenanigans that where told to us, but the scumbag Cynic. DemonSpawn COO of Bad Company
    13 points
  4. I appreciate it Demon. No hard feelings BC, all is well. ? I got to make some additional new friends in the process, so it ended up working out. Best of luck on your rebuild. ? ❤️ Thanks Dear.
    13 points
  5. 10 points
  6. And their allies https://politicsandwar.com/index.php?id=15&keyword=Tesla&cat=alliance&ob=score&od=DESC&maximum=50&minimum=0&search=Go&memberview=true
    6 points
  7. I’m actually glad to see the war ongoing. Shows you who really sticks it out for their respective alliance.
    6 points
  8. Welcome back to OrbisMojo, today we will be discussing the top ten reasons why NationRP is for degenerates. 10. It doesn't affect the game what so ever making it useless 9. It's boring, like who cares about your nation running out of milk 8. Shifty doesnt like it, shifty has to approve 7. Alex likes it, that's just bad 6. RPers are losers ingame They never post in orbis central or alliance affairs because they are cowards 5. Only libtards use NationRP 4. There is an actual game called NationStates that is only RP. PnW is an actual game, play one or the
    5 points
  9. 5 points
  10. That's the worst part of the night.
    5 points
  11. I don't remember signing off on this apology... I disapprove.. If Kev wants his apology he'll come to Kilo's Korner and get an official apology from me.
    5 points
  12. Didn't parti already announce he was leaving last month when he left?
    4 points
  13. Did you ever want to know a bit more about members of our community OR just simply wanted to get to know someone or anyone? ORB Weekly has been interviewing members of our community since our first day, it is our mission to learn about people in our community and hopefully connect you to those people. We don't just keep it 'game' related, we step over into their RL, their history, everything we can possibly think of to get you a natural interview. Our questions change as the game changes and events in our real world change - so always keep a lookout for our interviews - want to be interviewed?
    4 points
  14. Kev is Great Would smash 8/10
    4 points
  15. I did this once! It was on your old forums. Classic Partisan, being so vain he omniretires just to get more sendoffs.
    3 points
  16. Further to the point it's just plain bad decision-making to protect an alliance that can't offer anything in return. I get the impression that a lot of treaties get signed without having a functional purpose in mind and it's just the FA head or the alliance leader wanting to propogate the idea that they're working hard doing FA things. As a general rule I think protectorate treaties are often deeply misunderstood. At their most basic a protectorate treaty is just a one-sided defense agreement, yet so many players simply look at the number of green lines on the treary web as a representation of
    3 points
  17. 3 points
  18. Oh crap, I forgot about kosmokenny. He definitely needs to be on the list for Worst poster along with the others I named. That is actually going to be a toughtopic to vote on.
    2 points
  19. @The Mad Titan This is only a suspicion, but part of the point of dragging out these war negotiations is to make sure everyone knows that declaring war on TKR-sphere is a pain in the ass; even if you win, you will be stuck fighting an Arrgh-type or VietTKR war for months after substantial combat operations are over, all while taking nukes. The problem is how well a coalition employing this strategy can hold out. At first, the members who leave will be garbage, EMC-type members. Next you get vacillators who fought it out for a while, but then decided they were bored of the game
    2 points
  20. At least 2 of those pages are just posts of people commenting on the length of the topic.
    2 points
  21. Sure, we did walk off for three weeks but that's already been discussed on here. That was an intentional walk off because we weren't done fighting, you all said you weren't done fighting, and we weren't happy with the terms, the progress of the discussions, or any of you really. Trying to paint us as flaky since returning is ridiculous. We talked and scheduled a time on a Sunday and arrived on that. No one walked away for a week after that. Your side asked about the next Sunday for a time, which we weren't sure we could make because of the holidays and so proposed the running talks inst
    2 points
  22. How dare anyone call them pixel huggers? AK is a independent alliance that has gotten in many conflicts over it's time that were definitely very hard because they were dogpiles. And even then. It's not as if they were 1.5billion in negative damage. Or that they were protected by 2 alliances. Stop being such bigots smh.
    2 points
  23. In honor of Cynic's fall from grace, I produced this parody... And then BK did the honorable thing and returned the BC bank.... So... Now I have it here to present to you... LIL Cynic Presents Issstealit Lyrics See a new bank, Isstealit (ooh!) Hoppin’ out to BK, Issstealit Smashing all that trust, Issstealit Runnin’ up a bad rep with no cares (ALEX) All to BK, All to BK All to BK, bank BK Got a new server, got a new profile And I got a new shill Pull up to BK like "what up, !@#$!" (ooh) Stole millions al
    1 point
  24. My idea is basically this. During the creation of an alliance, you would be able to choose what "type" of an alliance it is going to be. There are going to be three options, a democracy, a dictatorship, and a monarchy. Each of them will add different elements into the game, and of course slightly change how alliances functions. Let's begin with the Democracy. Choosing the democracy category, the game will automatically update every, let's say, week. During the week, members are allowed to vote for people to become a government member, or something of the sort. There will be a required amo
    1 point
  25. No, the worst part is @Spaceman Thrax not keeping up with his segment on the show.
    1 point
  26. I hate Kilo. Best part of Great Job is shutting Kilo’s Corner down. =x
    1 point
  27. Recently a deliberation had been convened in private. Many advisors, military personnel, and respectable individuals hand-picked from the populace in support for a Free Scotland had been called to this meeting. It was well known that Monarchial Governments were on the way out for Democracy in the new world, primarily, and sometimes Monarchies were even seen as immoral and questionable, as if Democracies were perfect. Many topics were held and many opinions made and heard; With the British Internationale being the formal government over occupied Scotland for several hundred years, many had beco
    1 point
  28. Oh dear, you weren't trolling. If you don't understand, then I fear I cannot explain such simple concepts any easier than have already been explained.
    1 point
  29. ALERT CONAINM/^}* %... Merry Christmas Instances of SCP-784 have increased and are highly dan~+*>^* JOLLY The Foundation is under [email protected]># the MISTLETOE Item #: SCP-784 Object Class: Euclid Special Containment Procedures: SCP-784 has been disguised as a gated community and is currently surrounded by a 3.5-meter-high, 0.8-meter-thick concrete wall to deter intrusion. The top of the wall is lined with electrified steel cable, and the gate is to be locked. Any non-Foundation personnel attempting to enter SCP-784 are not to be interfered wit
    1 point
  30. I'm so glad you asked! Let's see... A. War stats don't matter and have zero relation to proposing terms B. SK is on the winning side, who usually propose terms in this sort of thing. C. SK are big boys and can propose whatever terms they like, all that matters in the end is whether they're accepted or not. Why are you making a fool out of yourself on behalf on an alliance that booted you to the curb? Smith can't hurt you anymore (probably) bby.
    1 point
  31. Can confirm, @Mikey is a cruel tyrant who desires nothing more than to crush EMC beneath the iron fist of cinnamon toast crunch. I mean, it's almost like arbitrary war stats have very little to do with any aims or goals alliances might have when choosing what to propose as peace terms. Who would've guessed?
    1 point
  32. Adding onto what Scarf said. Is there anything the community could do to help? Im sure there are people who would be willing to. If it's just a matter of this being a busy time of year could you just reopen the stats as they were until you have the time to work on it? What was there before was great and some stats are better than none.
    1 point
  33. ALLIANCE CATEGORIES Alliance of the Year: Black Knights or Knights Templar - hard pick, honestly, between these two. Both were active throughout the year and actually did things. KT fought against BK, NPO, and TKR/Friends blitzes, and still performed well against that adversity - as well as made a drastic move to leave the comfort of the treaty web clusterfrick. Black Knights actually took the initiative for once and hit KT/TKR. Most Powerful Alliance: Before the rolling, I would've said TKR. Then before Partisan left, I'd have said Syndicate. Now? No idea. BK I woul
    1 point
  34. Kind of a shame that it's been offline this long; this site was astonishingly useful and well-crafted. If there's some circumstance that's making it inconvenient or impossible to maintain, maybe it could be shared...?
    1 point
  35. checks the title of the topic Did you really miss the chance of writing "Ayyfrikan Safari"?
    1 point
  36. TGH launched on February, without allies or protectors, and joined a global war where both sides were fairly even roughly three weeks after. Then we signed KT and both of us fought off TKR and friends, month and a half after said global ( and in spite of obvious disadvantages for us), for two months and some extra days in change. Empi and Obv came afterwards. AK launched on June, and so far, unless I'm missing something, all it has done is join a global which is heavily on their favor four months after their inception, declare war on pirates, and when they found themselves in mildly hot wa
    1 point
  37. No, you're not. AK is relying on other's protections just to exist. You're not strong at all. You're pretty much Vanguard tier at this moment.
    1 point
  38. So, Syndi protectorate and BK protectorate? Why not get Grumpy to sign as well?
    1 point
  39. A misclick is usually fixable on trading just simply deleting right after after it's posted. With the bot, they don't have that option and it's constantly retrieving the information. Point of the matter is, we don't like it and we're rectifying it. You're free to continue posturing against IQ but I don't care. Your analogy is trash as leaving your bike unattended doesn't excuse the theft. Feel free to make the thieves into the good guys. It's totally not transparent.
    1 point
  40. No one is going after them. They have the option to sell their infra, as you can see in the terms. If their alliance loves them so much, they can just rebuild them with their own funds. Sell down to 1k and then just rebuild. That easy. I see no reason (from an IC point of view) to let nations again and again VM and then get "punished" by their alliances by getting taxed. These taxes are used to rebuild faster the alliances that were hit. Believe it or not, some alliances want to cause as much damage as possible to the opposing side and having VMers coming back post-war to rebuild the rest
    1 point
  41. Guess it's been awhile since some of the people proposing these terms have won a war. They better hope they don't lose one again any time soon. At one point we had some friends on the other side of this one, but that is clearly no longer the case.
    1 point
  42. tl;dr: CoS declares war on Guardian Mandatory non-chaining Destruction and Optional Annihilation Pact Article I: Sovereignty The signatories of this treaty promise to infringe on the sovereignty of each other, and agree to mutually disrespect the right to conduct one’s internal affairs without external interference. Article II: Intelligence The signatories of this treaty agree that they are very intelligent. Article III: Mandatory Destruction Both parties are obligated to bring it on... Article IV: Optional Annihilation … till there is no
    1 point
  43. Hey CoS let’s have some fun warring too! I would write up something about being on my lawn and how I don’t like it, but I’m a little busy! Good luck and I look forward to meeting a bunch of your members on the battlefield! -SRD
    1 point
  44. Huh, interesting that you feel that way. I wonder who else felt that way earlier this year.
    1 point
  45. Well I have some friends who are mad at me, but I think Ripper's done a pretty elegant job explaining some of our rationale. I love Guardian but I also am excited to fight someone of their caliber. With the current state of politics, I didn't see a better way to be friends to Guardian than to bring them a good fight. I'm hoping you guys will see it similarly. Give us Hell, and best of luck.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.