Leaderboard

Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.

disclaimer: since the stat track is down i don't know the exact numbers - it's probably less than 600 bil tho

Just have more improvements be destroyed. Increase the 'base' probability of improvements being destroyed from all types of battles.

Y'all do a bad job at keeping this thread pure.

Take trash like this to national affairs.

I don't honestly see why we need to include a cookie cutter [DOW], [Treaty] etc to every thread title, @Dio Brando @Nizam Adrienne, Dio and Nizam I agree with 100% it just looks bland and it takes up space in the title for no reason. Just add tags there shouldn't be any reason why having tags not restricted to this sub-forum is a bad idea. In fact I'd argue its a good thing because someone can make a 'Sir Lanka 001' tag which will tell you to avoid that thread for threat of losing brain cells.

This is a little different, this is IronFront's participation award for Dial-Up. (has a 10 second refresh) Also - just felt necessary to say this, this is just a game regardless of how invested you are, this is just memey propaganda. I don't hate anyone here in the game, I love my SOUP people they are some of the greatest friends I have here, Akuryo im sure is a nice person too - this is all IC as it should be. Much respect for all in the war o/

Aren't TGH just an oversized micro at this stage? So I doubt they'll have much to say in their surrender talks as its mostly just major players who do the talking. Considering the Hippo loves his stats I'm sure they'll love these:

Yes, I have a concern. This is horrible for purposes of creativity, and makes alliance threads look incredibly sterile. That people have found clever ways to name their announcements and threads should be encouraged as it adds taste and flavour to the game. A far superior method of accomplishing organization would be to give players the ability to add forum tags to threads, like so: E: Surely you mean 'Thread', and not 'Threat'?

Problem: Improvements rarely get destroyed in cities, no where near the rate at which the infrastructure that supports them gets destroyed. This creates an additional problem in that nations never really stop producing resources even during war, thus further saturating the market. Solution(s): Cities do not work as well when it’s operating above the improvement level it can support. If a city is at 40/20 (They only have the infra to support 20 improvements but have 40 from pre-destruction levels) improvements it operates at a 50% capacity, this capacity is capped at 50%. Thus if it was at 40/10 then it would still work at 50% but 40/30 would operate at 25%. What that means is you can only produce 50% commerce / refinement /raw production during this time. In addition to the improvement production rate decrease, when operating above the infra levels which your nation can support you improvements decay over time. For every 5 days a city is operating with more improvements than it can support one is destroyed at random (barring power plants) Areas to consider: Should this production capacity reduction impact military unit production -- This would likely lead to nations deleting improvements that focus on economy to keep an more functional military, or rebuilding infra. The complaint that this "punishes the loser", the loss primarily comes from reduction in income, as improvements are very cheap to replace. The real loss comes from lacking the production you had pre-war while you rebuild. Though this lessens resource/money saturation some. This limits the ability for the losers to fight back over long periods of time. This is somewhat of a blessing in that wars won't drag out forever -- well they might still but it makes it more costly for the nations with no infra lobbing nukes and such. The non-operational should possibly take effect after 5 days from the first infra destruction in the city. That way in a surprise attack those cities aren't instantly gimped, the reason for 5 days is that is the cycle of 1 war max time.

Weve done it more than Thrice Real name no gimmicks Two Micro Alliances go round the outside Round the outside, round the outside Two Micro Alliances go round the outside Round the outside, round the outside Guess who's back, back again GPC's back, tell a friend Guess who's back, guess who's back? Guess who's back, guess who's back? Guess who's back, guess who's back? Guess who's back? I've created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Sean Anthony no more They want GPC, I'm chopped liver Well if you want GPC, then this is what I'll give ya A little bit of micro mixed with some memes Some shitposts that will jump start my heart quicker Then some drama when I get shocked on the server By the micros when I'm not cooperating When I'm rocking the table while he's discussing "Hey" You waited this long to stop debating 'Cause I'm back, I'm on the rag and ovulating I know you got a new alliance Diomedes But your reputation's failure problem is complicating So Orbis won't let me be or let me be me so let me see They tried to shut me down on P-n-W But it feels so empty without me So come on and dip, bum on your lips frick that, come on and shut your sh*t And get ready 'cause this sh*t is about to get heavy I just settled all my problems, "frick you, Alex!" Now this looks like a job for me So everybody just follow me 'Cause we need a little controversy 'Cause it feels so empty without me I said, this looks like a job for me So everybody just follow me 'Cause we need a little controversy 'Cause it feels so empty without me https://youtube.com/watch?v=YVkUvmDQ3HY https://politicsandwar.com/alliance/id=5485 https://discord.gg/P4cJZDP Tl;DR - GPC officially declares its fourth existence

@Buorhann

If this ever goes south You know who to call

I really like the concept of npc nations, please post Asia!

@Noctis Anarch Caelum honestly dude, you get shit on by basically everyone in Orbis and you somehow manage to maintain your composure. I don't know what that says about you, but it's something.

Swagrr declares existence. Protected by Yarr. https://discord.gg/SVMpCAw and yes this is a stolen flag.

It will be sad if we haven't gotten our name back by then.

Partisan and I have quit the game 47 times each, and are still making the same jokes. He also still hasn’t gotten his name back.

Really? because every war i fight against BK or IQ in general, the assumption is that its going to last a few months.

Its text m8 you cant make text "sound" good

Okay I’m gonna continue my crusade here. After much pestering in the now closed thread I was told victory is when one side admits defeat. So you’re not winning. We’ve not admitted defeat in the slightest. In fact it’s quite clear we think we’re still doing quite well despite the recent successes your side has had in harpooning whales. if this is not the case I’m still waiting for what winning is for your side if it’s not stats and it’s not anything that can be measured prior to the conclusion of the war. Additionally, I have no idea what universe you’re living in that KETOG was ever a hegemony.

What?

I'm sure all your smaller buddies would be able to attest that they've been doing nothing but winning for a month, even before NPO entered lol. I'd rather win the war than have stats as my consolation prize, but whatever makes you guys happy.

The damage we took during Surf's Up was a sunk cost. That damage was going to happen regardless of whether this war happened or not. At the beginning of this war, Chaos and KETO had already taken massive damage (particularly Chaos) and were unable to generate revenue while BKsphere was plotting another dogpile and making money. Now both sides are in cinders and making minimal money. From our perspective the only alternative to this would have been rebuilding and probably getting dogpiled by you 2 months from now (though I'm sure you are planning to do this even now). Also, since we are talking stats, let's not forget the billions and billions of infra your side deleted. Furthermore, you keep citing air superiority, but why do you think that even matters? In Knightfall, your overwhelming numbers advantage allowed you to create a safezone where some of your nations could have a reasonable amount of infra and make money while our coalition could not. This is not going to be the case in this war. Even if 100% of your side has air and 100% of our side does not, what difference does it make? There is nothing left to destroy. As far as your claims that this is an "aggressive war" on our part, I'm just going to sum up my argument with TheNG since he never responded to me: Calling this an aggressive war on our part is silly. Once those leaks were revealed it was clear our side had two options. Either wait to get dogpiled by you or take the fight to you. We did not start this, this is your war. All we did is speed up your timeline.

Our members do have fun, and it literally matters 0 if you do to us. The meta you seek is a short beat down in which you can perpetuate the current hierarchy, and we’re under no responsibility to play ball.

Change the name Salty Seamen or.... bust

I only care if they won, which they did, just like us.

You guys are still complaining about this? Boo-hoo. Don't start wars you can't finish then. NPO clearly just had to step up and show us Coalition B newbs what a real rolling looks like since your coalition failed so spectacularly at doing it. ?

IQ only declares war for the noblest of causes, my friend.

Cant tell if this is satire or salt ?

Another day another thread sigh

WHEN STATISTICS PROVE YOU ARE WINNING BUT WHEN THEY AREN'T STATISTICS AREN'T EVERYTHING!

Aight you people! Who forced Scarfalot to do gender studies and when did he become a social justice warrior all of a sudden? I'm confused.

I... Uh... Have a thing to do somewhere else...

I rebuilt my 3.8k from Knightfall so its no issue for me to rebuild, saved up plenty.

We handled this better than Knightfall's rolling, so I'm pretty happy. 1st round was going to be tough for us regardless,

Congratulations to Rozalia. Condolences to Mayor.

One would think you guys would stop to amaze at one point. But hey few days ago you forced a third party alliance to cancel their MDP, today you disbanded a coalition mate. So I am really interested and asking how much are your meatshields letting you get away with? Also, the stunts you pull are so many. Someone needs to keep track.

lol just a new empyrean member paying respect

I'm not accusing you of anything and it wouldn't really bother me if you were creating a hegemony. What does bother me is the shens about multi-spheres rather than a bi-polar world and then spitting in the face of that with your very own actions. If you can't see that your actions are disputing your own words then who really is the stupid one here? PS: I don't have ties to BK. All the signs are there that this war isn't a victory for your side and that it will lead to a victory for coalition B. Hence why I said a losing war. I didn't say you had lost.

I'm merely mentioning the issues with the Axis in general. On Discord, I've compared Chaos to the Italians (given that the Italians were notoriously bad, so much that they got stalled by Ethiopians of all people) to Akuryo's amusement. And once again, any serious student of WW2 will note the weaknesses of German forces in general. Tactically competent, but strategically dense (the siege of Kiev was a major German victory, but it diverted forces from the advance on Moscow that gave the Soviets their first major victory). I'd also mention that trying to identify yourself with the Axis on the Eastern Front is very KKKT, given the numerous war atrocities committed by the Germans. Part of the reason the Soviets were so willing to sustain large casualties in attacks was that the Nazis were committing genocide in held ex-Soviet territories and that the speed of the advance was crucial. Recently, I was muted for 48 hours on the Discord for being critical of Islamic fundamentalists. Is this racism exceeding mine?

Supports are downvotes ofc this is a Sri Lanka post

The Alliance Affairs specific rules have been updated, see: The change made to the rules is the following: Essentially, if you're posting a treaty announcement, start your title with "[Treaty] {Announcement name here}" and similar for the four designations above ([DoE], [DoW], [Bloc]). The forum moderators will start enforcing this going forward, so please tag your new threads appropriately. Note that you're allowed to make announcements other than the ones listed above, and if you do, they do not require tags. The point of the tags is simply to make the Alliance Affairs subforum easier to navigate and understand. If you have any questions, you're welcome to ask them here. This thread will remain pinned temporarily until everyone is adjusted to the new norm.

mass upvote you my friend #microslifemaster