Sphinx

TKR was quite confident in Knightfall they could fight to get better terms but it achieved nothing only prolonging a lost war. The bot terms were upheld despite the weeks of indignation EMC showed towards what the Anti-EMC coalition were trying to force on us. If you guys want to make the same mistake twice in a year then be my guest. But you've well and truly lost this war and the only thing uncertain for now is when your side will finally admit it, we're perfectly happy to wait. We only have one requirement for peace which is a NAP of several months length, as it was rejected by various parties we thus have no intention of entering peace talks unless you're willing to consider the proposal. You also unanimously rejected conducting peace talks separately from each bloc (That doesn't mean you peace out at different times only for example that KETOG doesn't need to be present in Chaos talks). We may end up forgoing the separate peace talks but the NAP is a non-negotiable term and so the war continues until you come to the table.

No kidding I knew a guy who had 16 windmills in his cities with 4k Infra. Not going to name drop but was glad when he got rid of them,

Wow..... For someone who's trying to be "inclusive" you're really hurtful to the elderly gentlemen that live in Ronny's retirement home. Only one 'G' at the end??? For shame good sir.... Grumpy deserve recognition for their great work in sitting around and occasionally dropping score to attack, only to get wrecked.

For the record various parties rejected our requirement of a NAP, if something as benign as that isn't palatable for your side then it doesn't leave us much to go from.

Umm well for starters we aren't IQ, and don't you think you're a bit paranoid if you have trust issues when our side has signaled on multiple occasions we're happy for peace but its only your unreasonable expectations which halt any chance of that occurring for now. Which will not help you guys at all, happy to sit on you until you agree to come to terms though. So whatever floats your boat. (If you guys even still had them)

Damage stats is honestly the only thing you guys have going for you, so I understand why you keep bringing it up but it won’t save you. Most of the alliances on your side are a pile of ashes, "winning" in the lower tier will not help you win the war you're only hurting yourselves as you prolong the war unnecessarily. But if KT or TKR or whomever wants to stay and fight a losing war that's their prerogative, but they have zero chance of victory and the longer they fight the more likely the weaker links in your coalition start to bail, and I already know several alliances in KERCHTOGG want out of the war badly. No one on our side set out to make this war last for ages but when we get asked for a simple white peace that's simply not something we'd accept in any stretch of the imagination. We presented some basic terms to start off with which were certainly not punitive at all and they were rejected immediately by KERCHTOGG leaders. It’s not our fault if your side refuses to come to grips with reality. Anyone is free to reach out to NG or I and we can get the ball rolling if they want to separate peace, since is burning for other player’s egos really worth it? Or thinking the Germans won WW2 because they killed 27 Million in the USSR. But as I said net positive stats is the only thing KERCHTOGG have going for them so its only natural for them to try and cling to any sort of hope that you can.

Had 3 on the first page already, on a roll!!!

Sardonic is here! > Gets PTSD from CN days Good to see a name from way back, hope you've been doing well.

Nope, its the video the OP posted. But yeah thanks for reminding me.... we never got that video either.....

Tell me about it

I fail to see how we are lossing, your side has already lost you've just not come to terms with the loss just yet. Taking out that frustation on people whom bare no fault of their own for the current political situation and calling them "cannonfodder", or "pawns" is just being a dick. You're simply making assumptions due to your biases against the NPO, if you have a community outside this game who you think might enjoy themselves then go right ahead and invite them, just have some perspective for once and don't post mindless ramblings on the OFW. Not really contributing anything to benefit the dicussion here mate. Agreed 100%, these guys will be ages away from shifting any potential balance in NPO's favour and by then I'd wager several would've deleted, left and joined new alliances or gone inactive. The fact is we've had an influx of new players to the game which is a net positive and instead people are being salty because they can't put OOC aside for one minute and are just using it to attack NPO. I admit when it first happened I was at first a bit wary but after thinking about it absoultely no harm can be done from this recruitment drive as more nations means a more fuflfiling game. (Asuming Alex's dodgy servers can hold up), So? Even if it is if they don't get something out of it they'll leave. People accept the 100/100 taxes in NPO because they believe in the community and support their fellow members. Regardless your opinions aren't really important on this anyway, since being an online game the members in that AA have every choice to walk away if they want to.

Nah more importantly they stole Goon Squad's flag.

@redfive Hey mate, Akarin over here might be trying to steal your identity. ;V Also, mfw when I see the new NPO invasion force....

What a strange person.

TCW had regular 6 month elections, before back in September 2018 during Felkey's Prime Ministership. Then it was changed so once elected the PM can remain in office as long as they like and new elections are only held if the current PM retires or is impeached with a 66% vote of the Membership and majority of the gov. So tCW's basically an elected autocracy now. However TBH I have thought on occasion of bringing back regular elections because I like the debates during the last one, and we've had no problems with it in the past. Although a caveat would be providing some requirements in place for eligible candidates. (IE, minimum membership length, previous gov experience required etc) My reasons were much more than just "war rep", its amusing you guys are still going on about that. Haven't you got new talking points yet?

Just to add onto Nizam's point. My load times the last 3 days have barely dropped below 25 seconds to load just one page, also getting that 524 error with alliance pages pretty much everytime I try to load it up. Some days I'm close to 2 minutes to load a page. So its unplayable for most of the day. Today has been pretty good, only got as high as this: On the bright side I'm having fond memories of my old Dial up connection from the late 90's and LAN parties with school mates in the early 2000's.

WAR ACHIEVEMENTS Achievement Name: Carthago delenda est Achievement Description (how to unlock): Reduce a city to 0 Infra in a war Achievement Name: Bomber Harris Achievement Description (how to unlock): Destroy 1,000 Infra in a single airstrike Achievement Name: Demolition Man Achievement Description (how to unlock): Destroy 5 Improvements in a single war Achievement Name: Tis but a scratch Achievement Description (how to unlock): Loss 34,000 Steel and 6,000 Aluminium worth of military units in a war and end up victorious. ECON ACHIEVEMENTS Achievement Name: Metropolis Achievement Description (how to unlock): Have a population of 500,000 in one city Achievement Name: Megalopolis Achievement Description (how to unlock): Have a population of 1,000,000 in one city Achievement Name: The old world will burn! Achievement Description (how to unlock): Have 500 pollution in a city. Achievement Name: Industrial Revolution Achievement Description (how to unlock): Have 8 manufacturing improvements and 12 raw resource improvements in a city. Achievement Name: Utopia Achievement Description (how to unlock): Have zero disease, 115% commerce, 0% crime, and less than 100 pollution in a city. Might have more ideas soon.

That's what Rosey meant, they know they've obviously lost the war so he's having a good time in other games, just not this one. :V

Your desperation is quite telling. 2 micros leaving doesn't change the fact KT's screwed, but whatever makes you sleep at night.

Nothing will top that...... greatest thing in this thread. Also.... @Charlie Traveler You have an incredibly sexy voice, if you're not being paid millions to do voice overs one day then this world should burn.

Serves DB right for sending assassins after me on numerous occasions, and for stealing my sweet roll. :V Good luck PO in your fight, and good luck DB hopefully you can use this war to bounce back from, learn some hard lessons and have a stronger presence in FA in the future rather than just clinging to a Prot for safety. Nah mate, its just speaking the truth.

@James T. Kirk @Frawley By order of the Radiant, jokes are punishable by death. Frawley and Gorge you are to report to your nearest Chaos Interrogation site for immediate termination.

We share our pain. ,;p Also I think the worst part is, its not localised if two improvements of the same type get destroyed. I've seen either: "as well as a hanger and a hanger" and "as well as two a nuclear power plants".

@Keegoz > Or when you have 2 Nuke Power plants and both get taken out in by a nuke, twice in the same war by the same guy......

I tried to reply to this before but the forum was glitching out for me, it still seems its just this thread which is making it hard for me to select text and to write my post...... Couldn't agree more mate, alliances that don't at least fight contribute nothing to the game. If you want to play a peaceful game of building a nation there are plenty of nation sim games on Steam you can play in single player where you don't need to fight or lose pixels. But this is a competitive game and pixel hugging shouldn't be tolerated. Also, Dreadnought war stats especially for a 1,051 day old nation are just pathetic: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=47239 War's make alliances stronger, they sort the chaff from the wheat. tCW is testament to that since KF made us stronger, despite us taking $120 BILLION in damages in that one war. But if an alliance has never fought they'll crumble very quickly. I don't expect they'll last very long if their leader's definition of taking massive damage is being nuked for $1.5 billion in damage. Also I don't think your thinking was off point, it was pretty spot on TBH. DB I suspect would handle being attacked worse than Quichwe and TFP do, which is an astonishing achievement if I might say so myself.