Dr James Wilson Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Just now, Archibald said: Blame your buddies, friend. We had no intention on getting involved and every intention on raiding arrgh for another 4 months. What buddies are those? Quote The Volleyball Avanti Immortali ..one, two, Jimmy's coming for you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archibald Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, Dr James Wilson said: What buddies are those? Ohh, right, I forgot you weren't in the war and just yelling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Olafr of the Faroes Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 2 hours ago, Filmore said: I can see why Ketog and Chaos refuse to accept those terms now These terms are a joke. Whateversphere (anti-memesphere) should pay WAY bigger reps and swallow much bigger loads before getting off the hook. If nothing else, this was lets neutrals grow in peace while the major douches of Orbis is being held down. 2 12 Quote "Don't argue with members of The Golden Horde. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." - Probably someone on OWF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Limbuwan Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 HOLYSHIT. 12 MONTH NAP. LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForgotPants Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 2 hours ago, Kastor said: All Chaos Bloc Alliances of Anti-Memesphere must include a statement recognizing that their CB was outdated and therefore invalid b. All KETOG Alliances of Anti-Memesphere must include a statement recognizing that there was no conspiracy to attack them and that they maliciously twisted the meaning of the leak and therefore their CB is invalid c. Rose must admit that they only joined the war because they thought they were bandwagoning in on an easy win and that they had no CB whatsoever Man how insecure do you have be in your victory to demand this? It's like saying, "I'm not wrong, you're wrong! Now put it in writing". 2 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dancemasterlee Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 14 minutes ago, Dr James Wilson said: I guess that's easy to say considering you bandwagoned in, what? 2 months ago? When the outcome had long since been determined? Bold statement...really. Weren't you just guilty of this yourselves like a week ago or whatever on turd mines? I mean this isnt e-bushido 1v1 swords in hand. 1 4 Quote Specialist in buttes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr James Wilson Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 12 minutes ago, Archibald said: Ohh, right, I forgot you weren't in the war and just yelling. Ah yes, I forgot where making one post qualified as yelling. You should work on your shitposting. 3 1 Quote The Volleyball Avanti Immortali ..one, two, Jimmy's coming for you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astryl Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 hour ago, Cypher said: It’s not “here are terms, let’s talk about them” it’s “here’s a term, now either agree with them or we won’t show you the next one and we’ll drag the war even further” Again, if you have no clue as to what’s actually going on in the broader picture, it’s better to remain quiet than to come off as a fool. Actually it's here's term A, once that is agreed upon we can move to term B, so on and so forth. Your window to negotiate is per term. 2 Quote Queen of Chaos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archibald Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 8 minutes ago, ForgotPants said: Man how insecure do you have be in your victory to demand this? It's like saying, "I'm not wrong, you're wrong! Now put it in writing". (Literally how every war goes. You should look up the treaty of versailles sometime) 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Otto Von Bismarck II Posted December 2, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted December 2, 2019 Just now, Archibald said: (Literally how every war goes. You should look up the treaty of versailles sometime) And we all know how that turned out. 4 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archibald Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Just now, Otto Von Bismarck II said: And we all know how that turned out. Yes I expect you would be an expert on that topic. 2 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr James Wilson Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 9 minutes ago, dancemasterlee said: Weren't you just guilty of this yourselves like a week ago or whatever on turd mines? I mean this isnt e-bushido 1v1 swords in hand. Lmao what? Quote The Volleyball Avanti Immortali ..one, two, Jimmy's coming for you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archibald Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Just now, CandyShi said: I think anyone above the age of 15 knows enough about that topic to know how it turned out. Unless you’re.. y’know... uneducated. Chill, Candy. As much fun as it is picking on your alliance and their obvious tendencies, you're small potatoes compared to TMC. 1 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRM Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 31 minutes ago, Archibald said: Blame your buddies, friend. We had no intention on getting involved and every intention on raiding arrgh for another 4 months. I thought BK was to blame... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James II Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 minute ago, CandyShi said: >Casually calls people Nazis >Also in an alliance that complains about people insulting other people. no double standards here. Just an FYI, an alliance called “Afrika Korps” is in your coalition, go check them out. Morality is a matter of convenience for the immoral. 4 Quote "Most successful new AA" - Samuel Bates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BelgiumFury Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Peace, did someone say peace?Ah... Nevermind. Welp, I am going back to my cave, call me when people offer serious peace proposals. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForgotPants Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 6 minutes ago, Archibald said: (Literally how every war goes. You should look up the treaty of versailles sometime) Sure man, you clearly are the only one with knowledge of history. Seeing all your highly intellectual and fact based posts here on these forums makes me oh so jealous. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
namukara Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 23 minutes ago, Archibald said: Chill, Candy. As much fun as it is picking on your alliance and their obvious tendencies, you're small potatoes compared to TMC. TMC? When did they get involved in this? Do you even know who you talk to, or are you just so used to nobody taking notice of you it's never really mattered before? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sardonic Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 (edited) Oh no not tiny amounts of money that are equivalent to what, a week's income for the alliances it's demanded of? Don't blame us for your inability to do cost/benefit calculations. Edited December 2, 2019 by Sardonic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
namukara Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 minute ago, CandyShi said: They’re probably purposefully acting stupid to deviate from the OP/point of the thread. Do you mean the fact everyone knows they're talking rubbish, their narrative has been proven wrong and they have no rebuttle to it aside from vague deflections and whataboutism? Yeah, it's been the NPO strategy since 2002: same shit, different game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sardonic Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 (edited) 4 hours ago, CandyShi said: Oh no you went straight to the reparations and ignored the “let goons raid whoever they want with no counters” part. Shark Week is a GOONS tradition. Edited December 2, 2019 by Sardonic 4 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Thalmor Posted December 2, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted December 2, 2019 30 minutes ago, Archibald said: (Literally how every war goes. Except that's just not true. You can look up almost every war in the game's history on the wiki, and you will never see terms like what is in the OP. Most wars end in a white peace. Some end with some combination of a NAP, admission of guilt/defeat, and reparations. You never saw shit like 'here's a nap, but our ally can raid you at will and you can't fight back' or 'pay back over 2 billion over a thing that happened over 2 years ago' If you aren't talking about in-game wars and you really want to bring in IRL concepts and events, we can talk about how the terms presented are unconscionable. Coalition B is writing the book on what it means to be a sore winner. 2 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
namukara Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 3 minutes ago, Sardonic said: Shark Week is a GOONS tradition. I would expect nothing less, and nor should anybody else who are living in our world. I can assure you it will be applied fairly to bad posters of both coalitions. Countering is a TI tradition. I would expect nothing less, and nor should anybody else who is living in our world. I can assure you it will be applied fairly to raiders from either coalition or none. I.e. Raid people, get countered. That's how shit works around here. 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post durmij Posted December 2, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted December 2, 2019 57 minutes ago, ForgotPants said: Man how insecure do you have be in your victory to demand this? It's like saying, "I'm not wrong, you're wrong! Now put it in writing". 1 minute ago, Thalmor said: Except that's just not true. You can look up almost every war in the game's history on the wiki, and you will never see terms like what is in the OP. Most wars end in a white peace. Some end with some combination of a NAP, admission of guilt/defeat, and reparations. You never saw shit like 'here's a nap, but our ally can raid you at will and you can't fight back' or 'pay back over 2 billion over a thing that happened over 2 years ago' If you aren't talking about in-game wars and you really want to bring in IRL concepts and events, we can talk about how the terms presented are unconscionable. Coalition B is writing the book on what it means to be a sore winner. Correction to you both, there was a war where NPO wouldn't surrender until a clause saying they did a good job was included. 11 9 Quote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjI4ROuPyuY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUUEHv8GHcE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shiho Nishizumi Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 minute ago, durmij said: Correction to you both, there was a war where NPO wouldn't surrender until a clause saying they did a good job was included. Don't get me started on that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.