BelgiumFury

It did not get buffed at all? I want to note I agree with this personally. Not everything needs to be objectively "good" it can also just be "handy".

Clearly someone with big enough balls to push for NPO like terms, but without balls big enough to own up to it publicly.

Thanks for your service Pre. Although we certainly didn't agree on everything, you have changed PnW for the better. Thank you for that.

Perhaps, just maybe Cora from UPN is enjoying her best life in a community she enjoys, and indeed perhaps are many others. I am not against making this game competitive, indeed I don't mind that big alliances have advantages because that is how competition works and competition in a game is good (imho). But what exactly is the reason these people would care for your message? Do you truly think if these people hated their misserable lives as you think they do, they'd still be volunteering to do it? Do you think Cora (just taking her as you mentioned her by name) would not be able to find an alliance if she wanted to? Perhaps, just perhaps they are indeed living their best life.

I basically agree with all of this. In general adding more demand for everything is always good (you can always add more supply if needed), it was also my prefered way of solving this issue but it was not to be. I do not think the game would be waiting / excited for a lot of drastic measures in descreasing raws (think losing a percentage of raws every turn, making infrastructure cost resources in upkeep etc..). Do you have any interesting suggestions on how to do so?

Heya; In general we have steered away from that because there would most likely be an "optimal" choice, which alliances would force on their members. That would severely limit RP styles for people.

I certainly hope so.

What i said was refering specifically to this paragraph:

On a personal level i want to say I agree with everything Pen said above. I want to note though that: Isn't as simple as it sounds. A lot of push back isn't just mass member alliances, also whale alliances or bigger nations who know how to play the game very wel. They just dont feel like they should be forced to log in every single day (or every three days) because that's a luxury they have right now and don't feel like losing. They feel like there is no reason to ask that of them because "pnw is a pretty uninvolved game anyway". I agree 100% with the solutions said here, and I do agree on a personal level that we should nerf innactivity across the board. Doing a log in a day isn't some huge time sink at all, and I think it is 100% fair to ask. I just don't think that it's fair to just blame mass member alliances.

I believe a daily login is optimal (as mentioned in private before), we want to encourage (new) players to log in daily. It will also have the least disruptive effect on the economy. I'm glad this nerf is comming and hope this might bring some relief to the raw resource prices.

Yes this is what should happen; i DM'd @Alex about this and he said that is how it would happen, i'm not sure why it doesn't work like this.

Super hard mode might be a real euphimism here

I was gone for like 2 days and when I come back 75 global wars have started, and alliances are all countering over a relatively small Midgard vs TKRsphere war? What in the name of the lord. Glhf

I personally just like the flavor of city age and the minor increase in revenue associated with it, i don't want it to be removed

yes. ps: add nuke trading too kthx.