Kyubnyan Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 6 minutes ago, Rosey Song said: It already is, you might want to check again why it was called the 168 day war. When will Rose act.... hehe. Does the countdown still exist or was it taken down? Humans cannot create anything out of nothingness. Humans cannot accomplish anything without holding onto something. After all, humans are not gods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sun Tzu Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 5 minutes ago, Rosey Song said: It already is, you might want to check again why it was called the 168 day war. what is it. i do know why it was called the 168 war, the really ended about 30 days in they were just waiting for rose to make a decision Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr James Wilson Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 hour ago, George Clooney said: I'm trying to figure out how this topic moves you closer to peace. I'm also trying to figure out how this moves the peace process beyond the constant whining about procedure that has taken place so far. Of course if you were actually engaged in something called 'negotiations' regarding the terms as they come up, that'd be great, but that's not happening at the moment either. Evidently, you like the current state of things, and don't want peace. So be it. I'm comfortable watching your members delete in frustration (R.I.P. G Nation) and your alliances slowly die. Are you? Wow. Tell us how you really feel, man. 1 The Volleyball Avanti Immortali ..one, two, Jimmy's coming for you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Patrick Stewart Posted November 20, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 hour ago, George Clooney said: I'm trying to figure out how this topic moves you closer to peace. I'm also trying to figure out how this moves the peace process beyond the constant whining about procedure that has taken place so far. Of course if you were actually engaged in something called 'negotiations' regarding the terms as they come up, that'd be great, but that's not happening at the moment either. Evidently, you like the current state of things, and don't want peace. So be it. I'm comfortable watching your members delete in frustration (R.I.P. G Nation) and your alliances slowly die. Are you? Who hurt you? 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lossi Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Patrick Stewart said: Who hurt you? Coalition A, why do you think he doesn't want peace. 1 Quote Former leader of Chocolate Castle 4/1/2021 "It's pretty easy to get abused by Rosey without being a weirdo about it" - Betilius "Rosey is everything I look for in a fighter" - partisan "I’m very much not surprised that Lossi has you blocked tbh" - @MCMaster-095 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiloist II Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 (edited) You mean the people hurling all the accusations of us (col a) not wanting to end this are the ones who actually have no desire to end this??? Colour me shocked. The same people who claim we’re killing the community are the ones content with watching deletions and alliances die? I’m not sure my brain can handle this plot twist.. Edited November 20, 2019 by Kiloist II 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComradeMilton Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Aren't the Coalition B alliance member counts growing throughout? I know of none that aren't so we're not very worried about that. If you want to keep fighting that's probably going to work well for B. Will it for A? 14 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Prefonteen Posted November 20, 2019 Author Popular Post Share Posted November 20, 2019 (edited) 4 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said: Aren't the Coalition B alliance member counts growing throughout? I know of none that aren't so we're not very worried about that. If you want to keep fighting that's probably going to work well for B. Will it for A? Nothing really changes for us besides that we don't have to spend our precious time jumping through hoops for your side's representatives. It's pretty clear that peace has not been and is not on the agenda. I'm glad we can clear up the structural lies about that being our fault though. As stated in our post, we're happy to surrender and negotiate our terms. But come to the table earnestly please. Edited November 20, 2019 by Prefonteen 18 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComradeMilton Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 You seem a lot more inclined toward log dumps and complaining on the OWF than negotiations. Maybe spend more time on the latter if that's a genuine desire of yours. 2 39 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micchan Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 4 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said: Aren't the Coalition B alliance member counts growing throughout? Arrgh has now around 600 players ARRRGHHHH 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Prefonteen Posted November 20, 2019 Author Popular Post Share Posted November 20, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said: You seem a lot more inclined toward log dumps and complaining on the OWF than negotiations. Maybe spend more time on the latter if that's a genuine desire of yours. Maybe I wouldn't be forced to seek out the OWF if my alliance and half my coalition had not been deliberately ignored in private channels for 3 weeks. t$ has not been allowed to "negotiate". Keep on trying to gaslight friend. Edited November 20, 2019 by Prefonteen 24 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post James II Posted November 20, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted November 20, 2019 Funny how they are more quick to respond to this thread than they are about replying to our reps. 2 18 "Most successful new AA" - Samuel Bates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Filmore Posted November 20, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted November 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said: You seem a lot more inclined toward log dumps and complaining on the OWF than negotiations. Maybe spend more time on the latter if that's a genuine desire of yours. Obviously you didn't pay attention to the post at all, for his complaint is that he's trying to negotiate for peace but Coalition B is just giving him the run around. Not only that, buts he's also added sufficient logs to back up his claim. So do us a favor and actually bother to read the post before you try to complain about it. 16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Ataxia Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said: You seem a lot more inclined toward log dumps and complaining on the OWF than negotiations. Maybe spend more time on the latter if that's a genuine desire of yours. You should get to know our snake friend better. Your supposition that he likes to complain and log dump more than attempting to start a negotiation process for the past 3 weeks is wrong. 3 House Stark Discord Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batavus Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 8 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said: You seem a lot more inclined toward log dumps and complaining on the OWF than negotiations. Maybe spend more time on the latter if that's a genuine desire of yours. Read more, troll less Comrade and you would know what you’re saying is nonsense. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asierith Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Filmore said: Obviously you didn't pay attention to the post at all, for his complaint is that he's trying to negotiate for peace but Coalition B is just giving him the run around. Not only that, buts he's also added sufficient logs to back up his claim. So do us a favor and actually bother to read the post before you try to complain about it. Considering how many people he's messaged (as shown by the logs) and how quick he's been to respond to my questions about the matter, it's safe to say that he's spent enough time on this. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComradeMilton Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 6 minutes ago, Prefonteen said: Maybe I wouldn't be forced to seek out the OWF if my alliance and half my coalition had not been deliberately ignored in private channels for 3 weeks. t$ has not been allowed to "negotiate". You choose to do this. You're not "forced" to post at all. TS needs its own channel from what I've read and if you're not negotiating reasonably or acting like this is an equal negotiation it's quite natural that you might not be receiving responses as quickly as possible. Our representatives are likely waiting for you to be more cooperative before continuing. 2 minutes ago, Filmore said: Obviously you didn't pay attention to the post at all, for his complaint is that he's trying to negotiate for peace but Coalition B is just giving him the run around. Not only that, buts he's also added sufficient logs to back up his claim. So do us a favor and actually bother to read the post before you try to complain about it. I read it in full. I explained he log dumped, even. This isn't going to help his side in negotiations at all. Perhaps Coalition B doesn't want its discussions linked so it's stopped responding for that reason when there was a log dump relatively earlier. This certainly isn't going to help anything. 4 minutes ago, Darth Ataxia said: You should get to know our snake friend better. Your supposition that he likes to complain and log dump more than attempting to start a negotiation process for the past 3 weeks is wrong. I do. 3 minutes ago, Batavus said: Read more, troll less Comrade and you would know what you’re saying is nonsense. I'm not trolling at all. I could, if you like, but that would be useful to establishing peace as a logdump. 34 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Batavus Posted November 20, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 hour ago, George Clooney said: Evidently, you like the current state of things, and don't want peace. So be it. I'm comfortable watching your members delete in frustration (R.I.P. G Nation) and your alliances slowly die. Are you? Do you know G Nations personal story? Do you react like this to every deletion? Exactly the toxicity this game needs to lose. A shame such an old alliance has ended up with such a toxic representative. 21 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xCTHULHUx Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 How long until the rest of the alliances get drug into this fun/mess/war/game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Prefonteen Posted November 20, 2019 Author Popular Post Share Posted November 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said: You choose to do this. You're not "forced" to post at all. TS needs its own channel from what I've read and if you're not negotiating reasonably or acting like this is an equal negotiation it's quite natural that you might not be receiving responses as quickly as possible. Our representatives are likely waiting for you to be more cooperative before continuing. I read it in full. I explained he log dumped, even. This isn't going to help his side in negotiations at all. Perhaps Coalition B doesn't want its discussions linked so it's stopped responding for that reason when there was a log dump relatively earlier. This certainly isn't going to help anything. I do. I'm not trolling at all. I could, if you like, but that would be useful to establishing peace as a logdump. Please reread (or read for the first time I guess) the OP. Before logs were brought out, plenty of attempts at actual diplomacy were made, and they were ignored and/or trolled. Now, part of the problem of keeping this behind closed doors is that your side's negotiators and government officials consistently make false claims about the progression of negotiations. While being given the run around, we are accused of stalling negotiations and being the cause for delays. Simultaneously, your officials threaten ours with sanctions if they share contents of the negotiations. We're not going to indulge that and take the blame for your side's transparent attempt at keeping us at war indefinitely. If you're going to make a move like that, you're going to have to own up to it. There is no merit for us in playing along if there is no desire for peace. 27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComradeMilton Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 10 minutes ago, Prefonteen said: There is no merit for us in playing along if there is no desire for peace. Perhaps that's why they stopped speaking to you. 13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr James Wilson Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, ComradeMilton said: Perhaps that's why they stopped speaking to you. You’re arguing that it’s Col A’s fault that negotiations aren’t happening in a thread where Col A has given plenty of evidence to the contrary. How exactly is this the conclusion you’ve come too? 2 1 The Volleyball Avanti Immortali ..one, two, Jimmy's coming for you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Prefonteen Posted November 20, 2019 Author Popular Post Share Posted November 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said: Perhaps that's why they stopped speaking to you. "They have stopped speaking to you because you are voicing discontent over them not speaking to you" Right 24 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teaspoon Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 6 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said: Perhaps that's why they stopped speaking to you. This ain't it, chief. 1 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lupin III Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 (edited) 27 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said: You choose to do this. You're not "forced" to post at all. TS needs its own channel from what I've read and if you're not negotiating reasonably or acting like this is an equal negotiation it's quite natural that you might not be receiving responses as quickly as possible. Our representatives are likely waiting for you to be more cooperative before continuing. I read it in full. I explained he log dumped, even. This isn't going to help his side in negotiations at all. Perhaps Coalition B doesn't want its discussions linked so it's stopped responding for that reason when there was a log dump relatively earlier. This certainly isn't going to help anything. This is such a terrible way of trying to justify this kafkaesque negotiation. We've obviously seen in Partisan's post, the logs particularly, about his efforts to try and begin these talks, his attempts being either evaded or trolled. As Partisan has repeatedly told you, how does it make it worse, if the talks aren't moving because of this ever-changing maze of demands? I'm not sure how you've come about this conclusion.... Edited November 20, 2019 by Robert Taber 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts