PigInZen Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Saru does not equal UPN. Mensa keeping it classy as always though. Ahhhhh I see that while you ≠UPN, Pfeiffer == Mensa HQ. Good to know that hypocrisy is alive and well over there. 1 Quote Priest of Dio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spooner Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Props to atleast one party from your side being honest for once in admitting that they were going to get attacked regardless, instead of continuing the facade that you attacked them because you thought they were entering. One thing you should know about Mensa, if the posts aren't by leadership, take them with a big ol' pile of salt. Most of us aren't privvy to what leadership is thinking. We're told we're allowed to attack XYZ alliance, and it's suns-out-guns-out. The majority of our membership doesn't really know the core reason we're going after a given alliance. Unless it's Rose. Then we know that the holy wrath of Dio burns hot with bloodthirst. 1 Quote ☾☆ High Priest of Dio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturninus Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Saru does not equal UPN. Mensa keeping it classy as always though. You knew exactly what would happen if you screwed with our Headmistress while she was on her period (which is always) so don't cry about it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saru Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Ahhhhh I see that while you ≠UPN, Pfeiffer == Mensa HQ. Good to know that hypocrisy is alive and well over there. Haha you got me there, fair play. Quote Second in Command of UPN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James II Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 One thing you should know about Mensa, if the posts aren't by leadership, take them with a big ol' pile of salt. Most of us aren't privvy to what leadership is thinking. We're told we're allowed to attack XYZ alliance, and it's suns-out-guns-out. The majority of our membership doesn't really know the core reason we're going after a given alliance. Unless it's Rose. Then we know that the holy wrath of Dio burns hot with bloodthirst. I fixed that post for you syrup Quote "Most successful new AA" - Samuel Bates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dalinar Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 First of all, that's a very old discussion, so why haven't you acted earlier? Or better yet, why haven't we acted earlier? Secondly, I can also cut up what you have to say and present it to other people anyway I see fit, but that does not make it evidence. I was present during that hypothetical discussion and by the end the conclusion was that we will be taking no part in the conflict. If your spy hasn't presented that to you then really he is not doing a very good job and you should consider a replacement. If he has presented it to you then why are you choosing not to share it with us? If you were present during the hypothetical discussion dated 10/7/15, I'm curious as to why. You were a member of TKR up until 10/15/15 and I received those screenshots from Partisan, not you. 2 Quote I will take responsibility for what I have done, if I must fall, I will rise each time a better man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Saru does not equal UPN. Mensa keeping it classy as always though. Lel the leadership of UPN does not equal UPN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Yes. Sometimes I like to mix it up and be a douchebag, a dickwad or even a shithead. I can attest to this. 1 Quote [22:05] <&Clarke> And what do you do Ivan? [22:05] <&Clarke> Do you make artwork and stuff [22:05] <@Goomy> he sort of prances about fabulously Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spite Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 In the words of pitchshifter: Kill, eat, exploit the weak Quote ☾☆ Priest of Dio just because the Nazis did something doesn't mean it's automatically wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bollocks Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 If you were present during the hypothetical discussion dated 10/7/15, I'm curious as to why. You were a member of TKR up until 10/15/15 and I received those screenshots from Partisan, not you. Quote The Coalition Discord: https://discord.gg/WBzNRGK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ibrahim (Banned) Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 (edited) If you were present during the hypothetical discussion dated 10/7/15, I'm curious as to why. You were a member of TKR up until 10/15/15 and I received those screenshots from Partisan, not you. Damn! That's an old discussion. Granted, I did mistake it for one that took place recently but the outcome was very much the same, and before I joined Odd Squad I specifically asked them if they were going to join the current conflict, and was unequivocally told that they had absolutely no intention of doing so. Edited October 22, 2015 by Ibrahim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerys Targaryen Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 (edited) Granted, I did mistake it for one that took place recently but the outcome was very much the same, and before I joined Odd Squad I specifically asked them if they were going to join the current conflict, and was unequivocally told that they had absolutely no intention of doing so. And why do you think they will say the truth, even if they are going to fight or not? By your logic, I can just ask UPN members Me: "Hey, are you guys going for war?", UPN: "Yeah, we are going to fight tS, its really a secret, so keep it to yourself, stranger." Me: "Of course I'll" (NOTE: I'm just pointing out how silly it is to ask some alliance whether they are going to war or not) If you want to stay out of conflict, you should select neutral alliance Edited October 22, 2015 by Aerys Targaryen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ibrahim (Banned) Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 (edited) Lets just say, I had, and continue to have, a high regard for the truthfulness of the person whom I asked. Edited October 22, 2015 by Ibrahim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerys Targaryen Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Lets just say, I had, and continue to have, a high regard for the truthfulness of the person whom I asked. It is a good virtue, but you can't expect everyone to say the truth ! After all, this is a game with the name 'Politics' in it Anyway, my best wishes to move forward Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Kurdanak Posted October 22, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted October 22, 2015 (edited) I have to say, Rose was way better to be at war with. Those guys know how to shitpost during a war, UPN just !@#$ and complains. <3 Edited October 22, 2015 by Kurdanak 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lu Xun Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Let me mention that attacking the protectorates of an alliance you're at war with, when they have shown their desire not to get involved in the war, is extremely low, but here we are, the strong do what they can and the weak do what they must. That said, if it were simply a matter of Mensa attacking UPN protectorates, that could be deplored by itself. UPN protectorates attempting to defect to Mensa to avoid getting rolled is worse, and the cherry on top is Robster attacking VI. People here apparently have no notion that if you're losing, you let your enemy commit the atrocities because your own "response" has no military or strategic value. And for that matter, UPN just got passed by VE in score, and UPN has taken 33% damage within the first 6 days of the war. Quote . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrishinton52 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 (edited) Let me mention that attacking the protectorates of an alliance you're at war with, when they have shown their desire not to get involved in the war, is extremely low, but here we are, the strong do what they can and the weak do what they must. That said, if it were simply a matter of Mensa attacking UPN protectorates, that could be deplored by itself. UPN protectorates attempting to defect to Mensa to avoid getting rolled is worse, and the cherry on top is Robster attacking VI. People here apparently have no notion that if you're losing, you let your enemy commit the atrocities because your own "response" has no military or strategic value. And for that matter, UPN just got passed by VE in score, and UPN has taken 33% damage within the first 6 days of the war. On the plus side, with all this attention, vargen might just get a mention in the syndicates next big blockbuster. Edited October 22, 2015 by chrishinton52 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Let me mention that attacking the protectorates of an alliance you're at war with, when they have shown their desire not to get involved in the war, is extremely low, but here we are, the strong do what they can and the weak do what they must. >desire not to get involved in the war >declares war or raids alliance(s) involved in the war Hm. 1 Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Bagel Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 On the plus side, with all this attention, vargen might just get a mention in the syndicates next big blockbuster.And now we get to the real source of this drama Quote <&Partisan> I'm roleplaying a not snake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrishinton52 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 And now we get to the real source of this drama Lmao yup we did it for the airtime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Saru does not equal UPN. Mensa keeping it classy as always though. Gg so Ole and Saru do not represent UPN. Does Hans represent UPN though? Does Aenir? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kadin Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Gg so Ole and Saru do not represent UPN. Does Hans represent UPN though? Does Aenir? Only things that make UPN look good represent UPN. Duh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Saturninus Posted October 22, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted October 22, 2015 Only things that make UPN look good represent UPN. Duh. So it's leaderless then? 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 So it's leaderless then? 10/10 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Bagel Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 So it's leaderless then? everyone is thinking it, you're just saying it. Quote <&Partisan> I'm roleplaying a not snake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.