Betulius Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 (mostly at MrBooty. And Alataq, even. I have no idea who Red is ) Morgan Fraser, and a dozen other names 6 Quote Dec 26 18:48:22 <JacobH[Arrgh]> God your worse the grealind >.> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alataq Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 We've been having a private dance with tS. How does BoC come into this? We chose not to hit a direct ally of UPN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadowthrone Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 (edited) Can't wait to send you folks to where you belong at some point, the dustbin of history. Edited September 16, 2016 by Shadowthrone 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Roquentin Posted September 16, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted September 16, 2016 This isn't salt, its straight up garbage. I'm glad someone's being objective here. Here is what TLF said prior to this: they said they couldn't handle a war and wouldn't honor their MDoAP with UPN because of that. I guess they can handle a winning war when it's already decided. 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 (edited) We chose not to hit a direct ally of UPN. You can see why they might be upset, though, given that you are attacking a coalition partner. You're right we have no relationship with UPN. But nevertheless we are both fighting on the same "side" of this conflict, and additional harm to us is a blow to them because it frees up resources that can be diverted to their front. We didn't hit BoC so there is no treaty to activate, like Valkyria at least had with Guardian. Personally, I dislike treaties and in any event we have no relationship with you so I don't mind the entry. I hope you get some experience out of this and I look forward to meeting any low tier nations you have on the battlefield. But it does seem like a blow to UPN. I also find it funny the positive reaction this is getting from people who were extremely upset with Alpha hitting us in a somewhat similar scenario. Edited September 16, 2016 by Mikey Quote Archduke Tyrell, Lord of Highgarden, Lord Paramount of the Reach, Warden of the South, Breaker of Forums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alataq Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 (edited) I also find it funny the positive reaction this is getting from people who were extremely upset with Alpha hitting us in a somewhat similar scenario. And the people giving it hate are the people who supported Alpha's decision. EDIT: Funny how that works? Edited September 16, 2016 by Alataq 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurdanak Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Morgan Fraser, and a dozen other namesOh, well, that makes sense. I'm not sure what I had expected. I surely hope MrBooty comes by this thread and manages to make this look less shitty. Though my hopes are not high at this point. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 You can see why they might be upset, though, given that you are attacking a coalition partner. You're right we have no relationship with UPN. But nevertheless we are both fighting on the same "side" of this conflict, and additional harm to us is a blow to them because it frees up resources that can be diverted to their front. We didn't hit BoC so there is no treaty to activate, like Valkyria at least had with Guardian. Personally, I dislike treaties and in any event we have no relationship with you so I don't mind the entry. I hope you get some experience out of this and I look forward to meeting any low tier nations you have on the battlefield. But it does seem like a blow to UPN. I also find it funny the positive reaction this is getting from people who were extremely upset with Alpha hitting us in a somewhat similar scenario. Mikey pls, this is good for business! We will be going against our theme if we were to object! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roquentin Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 You can see why they might be upset, though, given that you are attacking a coalition partner. You're right we have no relationship with UPN. But nevertheless we are both fighting on the same "side" of this conflict, and additional harm to us is a blow to them because it frees up resources that can be diverted to their front. We didn't hit BoC so there is no treaty to activate, like Valkyria at least had with Guardian. Personally, I dislike treaties and in any event we have no relationship with you so I don't mind the entry. I hope you get some experience out of this and I look forward to meeting any low tier nations you have on the battlefield. But it does seem like a blow to UPN. I also find it funny the positive reaction this is getting from people who were extremely upset with Alpha hitting us in a somewhat similar scenario. It's a lot worse since tS was never countered at all and non-chaining would have applied. The UPN-TLF treaty was directly triggered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosonome Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Are you serious? lmao. This is beyond crappy. You ignore an MDP treaty that was directly activated with UPN and attack someone else on the side with no treaty link,. Like if you don't get shit for this, then no one has any standards. The other side accepting every bandwagoning piece of scum is telling. You are literally the Storm Division of this war. Orbis is not like Europa Universalis 4 game, where you have a treaty and need honour or get prestige -100. Every alliance talks with others alliances, get some common ground, and voilá. Magic. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Communication goes a long way... 1 Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Roquentin Posted September 16, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted September 16, 2016 Orbis is not like Europa Universalis 4 game, where you have a treaty and need honour or get prestige -100. Every alliance talks with others alliances, get some common ground, and voilá. Magic. Typical. If someone brings up a legitimate complaint, 12 year old-style "u salty bro" in response. That's why the discourse here is trash. 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Mikey pls, this is good for business! We will be going against our theme if we were to object! Lol like you give a crap about business. When I approached you about funding my investigation into how many licks it takes to get to the center of a tootsie pop, do you know how many of my calls were returned? 0. Are you really going to tell me that information wouldn't be worth billions? Trillions? We could have been kings Eumir, we could have been kings... 6 Quote Archduke Tyrell, Lord of Highgarden, Lord Paramount of the Reach, Warden of the South, Breaker of Forums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aksel Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Oh, well, that makes sense. I'm not sure what I had expected. I surely hope MrBooty comes by this thread and manages to make this look less shitty. Though my hopes are not high at this point. Keep your hopes low. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pangui Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Orbis is not like Europa Universalis 4 game, where you have a treaty and need honour or get prestige -100. Every alliance talks with others alliances, get some common ground, and voilá. Magic. Why sign Mutual Defense level treaties then? Why include the language if you have no interests in following through. Go paperless, sign ODPs, if you have conflicting interests you could stay out of the war. TLF however choose a route that negatively affected their highest level treaty. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alataq Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 (edited) I'm glad someone's being objective here. Except they're not. Edited September 16, 2016 by Alataq Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sans Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 So much for a sphere based on happy go lucky genuine friendships. Right Milton? Quote “ Life before death. Strength before weakness. Journey before destination. †–The First Ideal of the Windrunners, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosonome Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Why sign Mutual Defense level treaties then? Why include the language if you have no interests in following through. Go paperless, sign ODPs, if you have conflicting interests you could stay out of the war. TLF however choose a route that negatively affected their highest level treaty. I don't know, I guess TFL needs to reply to that, not me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Placentica Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Wait, so you don't defend your ally The Old Guard, when they were attacked by BK and now you are doing this? This has got to be the biggest case of cowardice and bandwagoning for this war. It for this reason that this game is heading to it's endgame stage and complete stagnation. You guys really make me laugh. 5 Quote Hello! If you don't like this post please go here: https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?app=core&module=usercp&tab=core&area=ignoredusers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alataq Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Wait, so you don't defend your ally The Old Guard, when they were attacked by BK and now you are doing this? This has got to be the biggest case of cowardice and bandwagoning for this war. It for this reason that this game is heading to it's endgame stage and complete stagnation. You guys really make me laugh. You're really not that observant are you? Also, this is rich coming from you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosonome Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Typical. If someone brings up a legitimate complaint, 12 year old-style "u salty bro" in response. That's why the discourse here is trash. Magic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jean Parisot Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 I better get another crack at Mr. Booty out of this, he still owes me a rap for the last war we fought <3 Welcome TLF I guess, still don't really understand why you chose to attack us considering your other options, but the more the merrier I suppose, have fun! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roquentin Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 (edited) So much for a sphere based on happy go lucky genuine friendships. Right Milton? Wouldn't really say TLF was part of our sphere in any real sense. It's kind of bizarre they signed UPN knowing UPN would likely end up in this type of war after the last war only to start shifting gears and treatying BoC. They're just cowards and seemingly naive. It's odd for such an old alliance why they don't see that this move is a backstab. Like Steve said, this type of behavior being acceptable is precisely why it's heading into an endgame stage. When so many alliances/people just want to win at any cost and it's encouraged, it will just lead to one side having the most alliances. The level of behavior acceptable here is just insane. Edited September 16, 2016 by Roquentin 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kastor Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 You're really not that observant are you? Also, this is rich coming from you. I'm just trying to know how it is rich coming from Steve. Just explain that for me. Idec about the other stuff, this post baffled me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
durmij Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Digging up an old meme for this."Irrelevant" 1 Quote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjI4ROuPyuY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUUEHv8GHcE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.