Buorhann Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 The rest of these posts are IC bickering which is exactly what this forum is for. Great. You, though, should quit while you're behind: Vacation Mode is an option to preserve your nation during a temporary absence. This tool is intended for players who are going on vacation or are for some other reason going to be unable to access the site for an extended period of time (i.e. Military Service). While in Vacation Mode, your nation will be unable to declare wars, fight existing wars, be declared war on, spy on other nations, be spied on, receive any sort of revenue, pay any bills, trade with other nations, or use alliance banks. There is no way to end Vacation Mode early. Vacation Mode is not a tool to use to avoid wars, and it is not a "peace mode". Sheepy said it's legit apparently. So consider me on the bandwagon of disliking the vacation mode addition. It's done nothing more than hide players while they can continuously post nonsense on the boards. 1 Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceman Thrax Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 Sheepy said it's legit apparently. So consider me on the bandwagon of disliking the vacation mode addition. It's done nothing more than hide players while they can continuously post nonsense on the boards. Ahh. My mistake then. Apologies Storm: please continue your forum vacation. Sheepy should at the very least remove that blurb then, because it's very misleading. I don't think that was quite the tenor of the conversation when he implemented that change, but that's probably an argument for somewhere else. 1 Slaughter the shits of the world. They poison the air you breathe. ~ William S. Burroughs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supreme king aeon Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 What kinda coward uses vacation made to stay outta war, and calls my alliance "pixel huggers"? could it be the same kinda coward that picks on smaller nations? or perhaps its the kinda coward that attacks an alliance openly, loses and crys about? I say loses because make no mistake coward you will lose, cowards dont win wars. Thankfully all the Orbis cowards are in one convenient place (arrgh) so alliances like UPN can get em all at once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 (edited) Correction: Arrgh was paid to help. We were indeed, though we were also very concerned about UPN accumulating too much power What kinda coward uses vacation made to stay outta war, and calls my alliance "pixel huggers"? could it be the same kinda coward that picks on smaller nations? or perhaps its the kinda coward that attacks an alliance openly, loses and crys about? I say loses because make no mistake coward you will lose, cowards dont win wars. Thankfully all the Orbis cowards are in one convenient place (arrgh) so alliances like UPN can get em all at once. That's a pretty hefty accusation you've got there fellah Edited April 8, 2016 by Ogaden Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supreme king aeon Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 which supposed accusation do you have a problem with specifically coward? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 which supposed accusation do you have a problem with specifically coward? I don't have a problem with you calling me whatever you like, I've never backed down from a fight in my life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boony Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 Mensa got entirely !@#$ed in the Great VE war, a war UPN was part of. Also, how did this thread get from UPN recgonizing hostillities with Arrgh to how Wrestlers were gay? If I am not mistaken Mensa's first alliance wide war was against us. It was the war when UPN chose to help VE/tS, without having a direct obligation. We had vastly superior numbers, but it was fairly early on in the game and UPN did the heavy lifting -- due to some of our allies/coalition members (such as WWF/CS/BK) at that point not having anywhere near enough resources to militarise fully. So we took the targets who had high militaries, and our coalition partners would then jump on after they were neutralised to get in as much infra damage as possible. And by their own admission from what I recall Mensa members were impressed by our performance, and learnt a lot from the experience. Whoops. I completely forgot about that war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supreme king aeon Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 (edited) A man is known by the company he keeps...... good quote wouldnt you agree, odagen. Edited April 8, 2016 by supreme king aeon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 A man is known by the company he keeps...... good quote wouldnt you agree, odagen. How's Abu Haddad working out for you guys 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bambino Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 We were indeed, though we were also very concerned about UPN accumulating too much power That's a pretty hefty accusation you've got there fellah Citation....er, oh, wait, nevermind. Let's keep it at least somewhat civil on our side here peeps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James II Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 Look at all the Penis flexing in this thread. Expected. 3 "Most successful new AA" - Samuel Bates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hooves Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 I find it funny UPN threads recently get all the posts like its candy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
durmij Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 Sheepy said it's legit apparently. So consider me on the bandwagon of disliking the vacation mode addition. It's done nothing more than hide players while they can continuously post nonsense on the boards. Vacation mode is still necessary, but the fact that it doesn't apply to the forums is baffling. It's should have an auto lock-out feature. Won't War? Can't Politics. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjI4ROuPyuY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUUEHv8GHcE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarke Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 (edited) I find it funny UPN threads recently get all the posts like its candy. I bring all the shit posters out of the woodwork. Edited April 8, 2016 by Clarke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sakata exchange Posted April 9, 2016 Share Posted April 9, 2016 (edited) Disregarded. You only have 18 posts. Go and read up on history of politics and war before making a case. I am only speaking for the previous score change which Arrgh became the most feared alliance from Dec to March because they and Mensa HQ was the only two alliances that successful adapt to the game mechanics and utilized it effectively. disregard. i've been here for almost 2 years now...different account different name. i bet i'm older than you in this game. the first i played was when VE mass migrated here. upon hearing about it at GPA((That terrible game that is totally irrelevant and I shouldn't be bringing it up anyways)) forums about this new game being developed by a former GPA'er (sheepy?) i jumped and tried it, since then i been at least 3 rerolls. Edited April 9, 2016 by sakata exchange Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sakata exchange Posted April 9, 2016 Share Posted April 9, 2016 If I am not mistaken Mensa's first alliance wide war was against us. It was the war when UPN chose to help VE/tS, without having a direct obligation. We had vastly superior numbers, but it was fairly early on in the game and UPN did the heavy lifting -- due to some of our allies/coalition members (such as WWF/CS/BK) at that point not having anywhere near enough resources to militarise fully. So we took the targets who had high militaries, and our coalition partners would then jump on after they were neutralised to get in as much infra damage as possible. And by their own admission from what I recall Mensa members were impressed by our performance, and learnt a lot from the experience. If I am not mistaken Mensa's first alliance wide war was against us. It was the war when UPN chose to help VE/tS, without having a direct obligation. We had vastly superior numbers, but it was fairly early on in the game and UPN did the heavy lifting -- due to some of our allies/coalition members (such as WWF/CS/BK) at that point not having anywhere near enough resources to militarise fully. So we took the targets who had high militaries, and our coalition partners would then jump on after they were neutralised to get in as much infra damage as possible. And by their own admission from what I recall Mensa members were impressed by our performance, and learnt a lot from the experience. yea this was the war i've been referring for...it was UPN who made that coalition win. before they joined there was no way VE et al can win that one, mensa has been killing everyone in their wake and very aggressive. that was also the first war that i made a big profit in the market. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kastor Posted April 9, 2016 Share Posted April 9, 2016 This thread is the dumbest thing I've ever seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hooves Posted April 9, 2016 Share Posted April 9, 2016 disregard. i've been here for almost 2 years now...different account different name. i bet i'm older than you in this game. the first i played was when VE mass migrated here. upon hearing about it at GPA((That terrible game that is totally irrelevant and I shouldn't be bringing it up anyways)) forums about this new game being developed by a former GPA'er (sheepy?) i jumped and tried it, since then i been at least 3 rerolls. Question, Why are you suddenly forum active NOW. When you could've been forum active during your last 3 rerolls? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted April 9, 2016 Share Posted April 9, 2016 This thread keeps on giving 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sakata exchange Posted April 9, 2016 Share Posted April 9, 2016 Question, Why are you suddenly forum active NOW. When you could've been forum active during your last 3 rerolls? ohhh..correction this is my 2nd reroll for the email used in this account. my first nation was banned (trade infringement), and the forum account for that i don't use anymore, and i forgot the pass for that now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted April 9, 2016 Share Posted April 9, 2016 Look at all the Penis flexing in this thread. Expected. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greatkitteh Posted April 9, 2016 Share Posted April 9, 2016 (edited) I bring all the shit posters out of the woodwork. Im enough to make 20 pages anyways Edited April 9, 2016 by greatkitteh :sheepy: :sheepy: Greatkitteh was here.- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bambino Posted April 9, 2016 Share Posted April 9, 2016 Epic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beatrix Posted April 9, 2016 Share Posted April 9, 2016 >raids UPN for months and has no diplomatic solution >raids UPNs allies >justifies war because a few members spied in retaliation top kek 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarke Posted April 9, 2016 Share Posted April 9, 2016 Im enough to make 20 pages anyways You are but you would do it in the ugliest way possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts