Micchan Posted February 16, 2018 Share Posted February 16, 2018 5 hours ago, Ripper said: Not beiging your targets is a valid tactic. I can fully understand it, although I know there is a much better one (a really obvious one) which you will have to think on your own. This, git gud Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patty Posted February 16, 2018 Share Posted February 16, 2018 IQ disbandment when Quote "There's nothing you can know that isn't known,Nothing you can see that isn't shown,There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be, All you need is love,Love is all you need." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted February 17, 2018 Author Share Posted February 17, 2018 @Eva-Beatrice, I'm sorry the red roses aren't to your liking. Can you tell me which flowers you prefer? I'll do better next time, I promise. Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuanduy1102 Posted February 17, 2018 Share Posted February 17, 2018 (edited) Well, looking at Taco's war activity at that point shows that when both nations gets to around 40-50 resistance, Taco was hit and zeroed by 3 other nations, so Bourhann could 1 ship beige or ground him, while Taco intended not to. Fortifying only works if you are the defender, not aggressor. Plus when each hit cost you 300-400 infra it's better to be beiged. Because the war was too deep in, it's almost impossible to wait it out, like Sir Scarfalot had shown in the TJ thread iirc. I admit it's dumb for Taco to keep a large amount of resource on hand. But then he considered himself in no danger and his military is much larger than Bourhann's until arrgh ghosts hit him. I couldn't beige Bourhann because Roq has my family. Send halp. Edited February 17, 2018 by Tuanduy1102 More details 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Them Posted February 17, 2018 Share Posted February 17, 2018 8 hours ago, Abbas Mehdi said: You want to eat away our military and not biege us at the cost of the 10 percent infrastructure damage to your nations? Is this a standard operating procedure not to biege us cause I didn't know that. If it is true then please let me know. I'm fairly certain that you fought in the last war, so you should know what the IQ policy towards Beijing is. This isn't a traditional alliance war, but the SOP generally hasn't changed. Quote [insert quote here] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rapmanej Posted February 17, 2018 Share Posted February 17, 2018 I am having fun too. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abbas Mehdi Posted February 17, 2018 Share Posted February 17, 2018 29 minutes ago, Them said: I'm fairly certain that you fought in the last war, so you should know what the IQ policy towards Beijing is. This isn't a traditional alliance war, but the SOP generally hasn't changed. Actually IQ as a whole didn't have a non bieging policy. I fought on the front fighting pantheon who we had to biege cause they were upper tiers. And as you say this is a non-traditional war, my question was addressed to an alliance leader who would be well aware of the military strategy of the entire alliance. Quote I am not a member of Guardian p&w Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Betulius Posted February 17, 2018 Share Posted February 17, 2018 4 hours ago, Tuanduy1102 said: Plus when each hit cost you 300-400 infra it's better to be beiged. If this is true, your warchest is shit. Quote Dec 26 18:48:22 <JacobH[Arrgh]> God your worse the grealind >.> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuanduy1102 Posted February 17, 2018 Share Posted February 17, 2018 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Betulius said: If this is true, your warchest is shit. Of course my current war chest is shit. If i had anything it would be looted away with the "no beige" tactic. I was beiged 3 times and i lost at most 3,5 mil in resource each time. Everything i had is in a safe place. Edited February 17, 2018 by Tuanduy1102 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James XVI Posted February 17, 2018 Share Posted February 17, 2018 6 hours ago, Them said: I'm fairly certain that you fought in the last war, so you should know what the IQ policy towards Beijing is. What's IQ got against China? 3 Quote THE Definitive James: KastorCultist, Co-leading Roz Wei Empyrea The Wei, former TGH warrior, Assassin, and a few more. Player of this game for more time than I want to think about... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post TheNG Posted February 17, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted February 17, 2018 7 hours ago, James XVI said: What's IQ got against China? They do not subscribe to the economic teachings of NPO, and are thus not good communists. 7 Quote "They say the secret to success is being at the right place at the right time. But since you never know when the right time is going to be, I figure the trick is to find the right place and just hang around!" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <Kastor> He left and my !@#$ nation is !@#$ed up. And the Finance guy refuses to help. He just writes his !@#$ plays. <Kastor> And laughs and shit. <Kastor> And gives out !@#$ huge loans to Arthur James, that !@#$ bastard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doughnuts Posted February 18, 2018 Share Posted February 18, 2018 On 2/16/2018 at 5:15 PM, Taco said: If we wanted to beige you guys we would have... but I’m sure you know it’s better for us to keep eating your military and never give you the 2 days to rebuild I am wondering how true this would be, because wouldn't beige them also give your guys to rebuild also, I am not expert so please forgive me if this is a dumb thing to ask, but wouldn't beating them in to beige taking those resources they have stolen and used to fight with be better than what you are doing?. I am new so wanted to know why you would choice to leave your lower city nations at high risk ?, plus these guys do not seem like the type who would remain in beige also. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcKnox Posted February 18, 2018 Share Posted February 18, 2018 On 2/16/2018 at 2:40 PM, Buorhann said: Yeah, when scouring through potential targets, I noticed a couple of trap nations. Won't say what makes them a trap, but there's a definite counter that I learned. Is it a benis? Quote Praise Dio. Every !@#$ing day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callisto Posted February 18, 2018 Share Posted February 18, 2018 On 2/16/2018 at 10:58 AM, Buorhann said: Roses are Red Violets are Blue I'm having fun How about you? (Sidenotes: There's more, but that's all I'm putting in a pic without flooding this post. 17 victories~ It's nice fighting you guys with your own resource stockpile.) Roses are Pink you !@#$! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 @Micchan could've been on dat gdoc this time around, but @Kayser be playin. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Scarfalot Posted February 25, 2018 Share Posted February 25, 2018 On 2/16/2018 at 9:47 PM, Betulius said: If this is true, your warchest is shit. That or his infra is too high. Low infra best infra. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted February 25, 2018 Author Share Posted February 25, 2018 36 minutes ago, Sir Scarfalot said: That or his infra is too high. Low infra best infra. For the longest time we preached 1500 Infra as being ideal for military hits. You don't lose too much when you get hit hard, and you can remain efficient at that level. Pretty lean build that has all the bare necessities. It's a bad production/econ build during peace times though. Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Scarfalot Posted February 25, 2018 Share Posted February 25, 2018 1 hour ago, Buorhann said: For the longest time we preached 1500 Infra as being ideal for military hits. You don't lose too much when you get hit hard, and you can remain efficient at that level. Pretty lean build that has all the bare necessities. It's a bad production/econ build during peace times though. Well, yes, but why have peace times? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted February 25, 2018 Author Share Posted February 25, 2018 2 hours ago, Sir Scarfalot said: Well, yes, but why have peace times? Who else to make ammo and steel? Or are you thinking everyone should go bare handed Soldier combat?! Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Scarfalot Posted February 25, 2018 Share Posted February 25, 2018 7 hours ago, Buorhann said: Who else to make ammo and steel? Or are you thinking everyone should go bare handed Soldier combat?! South America, produces everything except steel and uranium. That covers your airforce, your munitions for troops, and missiles. This does regrettably leave navy lacking, so team with North Americas in order to cover the steel and uranium. 1500 infra, at least the way I set it up in the last tournament, gives 3 improvement slots left over for resources, so there's at least some domestic resource income even when running a full military build. That said, sustaining that build in active war does require more than that domestic resource income, so there is that... but if one is going to be at war at all times, then tanks are arguably not worth their steel, and so if one goes without tanks then that's a good 5 improvement slots open to use for resources. The factories can be built again if they're needed. What's wrong with unarmed soldier waves anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shiho Nishizumi Posted February 25, 2018 Share Posted February 25, 2018 51 minutes ago, Sir Scarfalot said: What's wrong with unarmed soldier waves anyway Only a fool trusts his life to a weapon. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apeman Posted February 25, 2018 Share Posted February 25, 2018 Strike and run then strike again. Effective tactic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.