Sisyphus Posted November 1, 2020 Share Posted November 1, 2020 10 minutes ago, Sketchy said: This slander against the mighty Syndicate can be tolerated no longer. When we planned a coalition with NPO to strike at all the other spheres, and entered a war to provide much needed foreign relief to the Black Knights, it was for the greater good of the game! You can't dare compare that to this! Sure, the origin of our foresight into future aggression is also Sphinx, but its not the same! Our record is impeccable, every single one of our many dominant deployments is perfectly justifiable! That you would dare compare our glorious strategic allocation of superior resources, to your pitiful and spineless canine accumulation, is downright unconscionable! The consolidation of 1000 profitable nations was merely a tactical deterrent against the dastardly schemes of our devious rivals. Had we not been subjected to such unwarranted aggression, we would never have deployed those resources against anyone! We would have sat aside and taken no action at all undoubtedly! I am fooled. Quote One must imagine Sisyphus happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shiho Nishizumi Posted November 1, 2020 Share Posted November 1, 2020 10 minutes ago, Sketchy said: This slander against the mighty Syndicate can be tolerated no longer. When we planned a coalition with NPO to strike at all the other spheres, and entered a war to provide much needed foreign relief to the Black Knights, it was for the greater good of the game! You can't dare compare that to this! Sure, the origin of our foresight into future aggression is also Sphinx, but its not the same! Our record is impeccable, every single one of our many dominant deployments is perfectly justifiable! That you would dare compare our glorious strategic allocation of superior resources, to your pitiful and spineless canine accumulation, is downright unconscionable! The consolidation of 1000 profitable nations was merely a tactical deterrent against the dastardly schemes of our devious rivals. Had we not been subjected to such unwarranted aggression, we would never have deployed those resources against anyone! We would have sat aside and taken no action at all undoubtedly! Will you AFK for 1/2 of the war duration after dropping a FA disaster of a statement once more this time around? 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin076 Posted November 1, 2020 Share Posted November 1, 2020 12 minutes ago, Sketchy said: This slander against the mighty Syndicate can be tolerated no longer. When we planned a coalition with NPO to strike at all the other spheres, and entered a war to provide much needed foreign relief to the Black Knights, it was for the greater good of the game! You can't dare compare that to this! Sure, the origin of our foresight into future aggression is also Sphinx, but its not the same! Our record is impeccable, every single one of our many dominant deployments is perfectly justifiable! That you would dare compare our glorious strategic allocation of superior resources, to your pitiful and spineless canine accumulation, is downright unconscionable! The consolidation of 1000 profitable nations was merely a tactical deterrent against the dastardly schemes of our devious rivals. Had we not been subjected to such unwarranted aggression, we would never have deployed those resources against anyone! We would have sat aside and taken no action at all undoubtedly! Are you jealous that some alliances econ can actually grow without taxing 100/100? Econ genius. 1 1 Quote Chief Financial Officer of The Syndicate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sketchy Posted November 1, 2020 Share Posted November 1, 2020 2 minutes ago, Prefonteen said: How's Odin's bank doing? Have you given it back now that he's your ally? I would never provide monetary support to enemy! I am a loyal Syndicate supporter. Any inaccuracies in my deployment of the party line will rectified I promise! On that note, I find myself requiring your guidance, how should I respond to those who ask me why The Syndicate has reversed their position on dogpiles? I will deploy the appropriate response handed to me, just as I see my other fellow Syndicate supporters have done. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted November 1, 2020 Author Share Posted November 1, 2020 1 minute ago, Sketchy said: I would never provide monetary support to enemy! I am a loyal Syndicate supporter. Any inaccuracies in my deployment of the party line will rectified I promise! On that note, I find myself requiring your guidance, how should I respond to those who ask me why The Syndicate has reversed their position on dogpiles? I will deploy the appropriate response handed to me, just as I see my other fellow Syndicate supporters have done. I see why you were IQs most hated poster now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sketchy Posted November 1, 2020 Share Posted November 1, 2020 Just now, Prefonteen said: I see why you were IQs most hated poster now. Thank you for recognizing my work! I understand you cannot provide the party line to me in such a public setting, I wait in eager anticipation for your direction in private! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bollocks Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 22 minutes ago, Sketchy said: Thank you for recognizing my work! I understand you cannot provide the party line to me in such a public setting, I wait in eager anticipation for your direction in private! The booty needs to make a comeback 1 Quote The Coalition Discord: https://discord.gg/WBzNRGK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Bolivar Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 What a topic. Aside from the the typical and usual adversarial nature of this forum, I have to say I find this conversation to be simply hilarious. Groups on both sides attempting to claim some nonsensical moral superiority when the truth is both sides are simply responding to the perceived and implied threat posed within the opposing sphere All in the game, yo. And with that we can now return to our scheduled broadcast of No U!! 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted November 2, 2020 Author Share Posted November 2, 2020 15 minutes ago, Charles Bolivar said: What a topic. Aside from the the typical and usual adversarial nature of this forum, I have to say I find this conversation to be simply hilarious. Groups on both sides attempting to claim some nonsensical moral superiority when the truth is both sides are simply responding to the perceived and implied threat posed within the opposing sphere All in the game, yo. And with that we can now return to our scheduled broadcast of No U!! No U Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrawn Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 5 hours ago, Sisyphus said: We "singled" you out by hitting you alongside a completely separate sphere? A sphere that implicated you as a paperless ally? Yes you did single out HM. Swamp was cooperating with HM to attack Quack according to Boyce's allegations. Amazingly in the same post that featured these screenshots, Hedge was the only one declared on and hit besides tCW. Without even questioning the validity of these leaks (Boyce saying random stuff), what else can that be called if not "singled out"? 5 hours ago, Sisyphus said: We were directly threatened. There's no way it's inconceivable to you guys that actively plotting against us would end up causing hostility immediately. By whom and what's the proof? These "leaks"? It's absolutely clear that if all you is this, then its not even close to enough. 5 hours ago, Sisyphus said: Are you suggesting that you were "singled" out because the other spheres currently at war with us are equally culpable for plotting against us? ( Because that's what I'm suggesting too ) How can that be the case if no one but Sphinx was doing the plotting? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphus Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 1 minute ago, Arric II Vysera said: -deliberately obtuse rambling- This is just deliberately obtuse rambling. Quote One must imagine Sisyphus happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Bolivar Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 11 minutes ago, Prefonteen said: No U Yes me. Me me me. https://youtu.be/zyNyHark4xk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphus Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 29 minutes ago, Charles Bolivar said: What a topic. Aside from the the typical and usual adversarial nature of this forum, I have to say I find this conversation to be simply hilarious. Groups on both sides attempting to claim some nonsensical moral superiority when the truth is both sides are simply responding to the perceived and implied threat posed within the opposing sphere All in the game, yo. And with that we can now return to our scheduled broadcast of No U!! I recommend you vote for my suggested war name: Quote One must imagine Sisyphus happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zed Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 27 minutes ago, Charles Bolivar said: What a topic. Aside from the the typical and usual adversarial nature of this forum, I have to say I find this conversation to be simply hilarious. Groups on both sides attempting to claim some nonsensical moral superiority when the truth is both sides are simply responding to the perceived and implied threat posed within the opposing sphere All in the game, yo. And with that we can now return to our scheduled broadcast of No U!! You as well as anyone out here should know that there are only three acceptable posts on the OWF, and everything else is just fluff. "Congrats" "What a surprise" "I am buttmad in my butt" 2 Quote In paradisum deducant te Angeli; in tuo adventu suscipiant te martyres, et perducant te in civitatem sanctam Ierusalem.Chorus angelorum te suscipiat, et cüm Lazaro quondam paupere æternam habeas requiem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Bolivar Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 1 minute ago, Zed said: You as well as anyone out here should know that there are only three acceptable posts on the OWF, and everything else is just fluff. "Congrats" "What a surprise" "I am buttmad in my butt" I think you have summed it up pretty well. 4 minutes ago, Sisyphus said: I recommend you vote for my suggested war name: Hallomony war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrawn Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 6 hours ago, WarriorSoul said: And thus you expect me to believe it mere coincidence that within twenty minutes of Quack declaring war on Hedge, both Swamp and Rose had countered against Quack, like there was some degree of planning already taking place? 4 days before any declarations everyone noticed that Quacksphere (the bloc everyone else was wary of) was militarizing like crazy and did the same. Why is it strange that other sphere's would then attack the sphere they see as potential bullies after they went and affirmed those fears? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeroofTime55 Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 1 minute ago, Arric II Vysera said: 4 days before any declarations everyone noticed that Quacksphere (the bloc everyone else was wary of) was militarizing like crazy and did the same. Why is it strange that other sphere's would then attack the sphere they see as potential bullies after they went and affirmed those fears? We militarized only after we got intel that you all were plotting to roll us in about a month. Stop spreading lies and own up to your plot. Stop pretending. We're fine to fight, but please at least have the integrity to admit what you did. Quote Worst Poster Ever (2011) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Adam Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 5 minutes ago, Arric II Vysera said: 4 days before any declarations everyone noticed that Quacksphere (the bloc everyone else was wary of) was militarizing like crazy and did the same. Why is it strange that other sphere's would then attack the sphere they see as potential bullies after they went and affirmed those fears? Hey! Like I responded to Thalmor, this pretense has already been disproven and dropped by multiple members of gov in HM and Rosesphere saying that backdoor secret treaties existed. You've only got your own people to justify this to, and when it comes down to it using this line of justification is pointless thanks to those admissions. Keep on the "Quack 2 smart" pretense. It fuels my ego. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeeeet Ronny D Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 if 3 of 4 major blocs all have backroom deals with each other against you guys, atleast that you think we do, maybe you should be asking yourselves why you guys are the odd ones out. Side note, who let Shrute Farms bandwagon in on this war? Can I hit them? I don't like being made a liar. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Adam Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Sweeeeet Ronny D said: if 3 of 4 major blocs all have backroom deals with each other against you guys, atleast that you think we do, maybe you should be asking yourselves why you guys are the odd ones out. Side note, who let Shrute Farms bandwagon in on this war? Can I hit them? I don't like being made a liar. There's no "think" about it Ronny friend. It's confirmed by multiple gov members in your coalition As for why we're the odd ones out, the only semi-valid reason I've seen so far is "Quack is good at recruiting, retainment, and having competent members". While I appreciate the compliment, jealousy doesn't look great on you. Edited November 2, 2020 by Itz 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorSoul Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 1 minute ago, Sweeeeet Ronny D said: if 3 of 4 major blocs all have backroom deals with each other against you guys, atleast that you think we do, maybe you should be asking yourselves why you guys are the odd ones out. I think the resounding answer from your coalition mates is "fear"? Very simple answer, if so. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrawn Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 15 minutes ago, HeroofTime55 said: We militarized only after we got intel that you all were plotting to roll us in about a month. You militarized in response to a claim with no proof or any credibility. I haven't yet address your last reply to me, but its lacking something that's also missing here. Substance. 18 minutes ago, HeroofTime55 said: Stop spreading lies and own up to your plot. Stop pretending. We're fine to fight, but please at least have the integrity to admit what you did. I haven't spread any lies. All I've done is scrutinize the case against Hedge, and so far it consists of logs of a TEst member saying Hedge/Swamp are planning to attack Quack and the fact that everyone jumped on you so quickly after hitting HM. I don't know if you know this, but that's not a case as all. 20 minutes ago, Itz said: Hey! Like I responded to Thalmor, this pretense has already been disproven and dropped by multiple members of gov in HM and Rosesphere saying that backdoor secret treaties existed. You've only got your own people to justify this to, and when it comes down to it using this line of justification is pointless thanks to those admissions. Keep on the "Quack 2 smart" pretense. It fuels my ego. I don't understand what you're getting at. You saying that HM, Swamp and Rosesphere are secretly working together against Quack and this cooperation proves they were plotting? Sure I guess. Dumb it down for me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Emperor Adam Posted November 2, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted November 2, 2020 7 minutes ago, Arric II Vysera said: I don't understand what you're getting at. You saying that HM, Swamp and Rosesphere are secretly working together against Quack and this cooperation proves they were plotting? Sure I guess. Dumb it down for me. Sure. As dumbed down as possible. 1. We receive leak from Boyce. 2. Given HM's hostility with us, we take the chance that they're already involved and mil up to hit on our own terms. 3. We approach Swamp (who has been rather friendly to us until now) and Rose letting them know we're not intending to hit them. 4. Rose shows signs via responses and military movements that they're readying up. 5. Swamp remains an enigma. 6. We hit. Rose and Swamp both counter blitz with completely formed offensives (thus proving the collusion was already there, it takes more than a few days to suddenly decide everyones going to hit Quack lmao). 7. Rosesphere gov reveals Swamp and Rose have a sooper sekrit MDP, and Rose proper has nothing to give as even a remotely valid cb. 8. Keegoz drops all bullshit (shoutout for being semi-straight) and reveals HM had a similar deal with Swamp. 9. All this culminates in proving there were already backroom discussions happening and alluding to the 3v1 dogpile being planned, albeit us ruining the plans a bit by pre-empting. I won't touch too much on TCWs involvement because it's already been gone over. That all said - this was inevitable. The only factor was who attacked first, and unfortunately for CoTL's city circles we aren't the type to sit on our hands and go out on someone else's terms. It boils down very simply to this: t$ and TKR (and the rest of the sphere, but mentioning us specifically since that's the main point of contention) are historically good at recruiting, training, and retainment. The other spheres see our competence as a threat, and if they had just admitted that at the get-go instead of making up convoluted bullshit about use becoming a hegemony (like... still have yet to see any actual proof of us heading that way? Lmao). Frankly I don't care too much about the dogpile itself. It's fun, it's a challenge. But at least be straight up and say you all worked together and it's because our combined competence is scary (shoutout to those who already have xoxo). 1 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphus Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 36 minutes ago, Arric II Vysera said: -more deliberately obtuse rambling- This is just more deliberately obtuse rambling. Quote One must imagine Sisyphus happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Salvarity Posted November 2, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted November 2, 2020 The real tragedy for us in Syndi will be having to deal with Adam's ego after all these IA compliments. 4 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.