Jump to content

Another micro announcement?!


Vassili Dovgan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Well, I think the time has come that the SWF follows its allies and leaves the Salus Bloc.

By this action, the Salus Bloc can technically be seen as disbanded.

 

I'm not saying we didn't have fun together!

We laughed.. We cried... Lots of soldiers died...  It was a good time.

 

But it couldn't last forever.

Good luck out there, UPN! o/

 

 

Signed

Vassili Dovgan, President of the Socialist Workers' Front

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Candidates for the "worst protector" award now includes:

- Rose

- UPN

 

Take your pick

The Rose scenario was rather different lol.

 

UPN knew its protectorates were going to be hit due to a war they started and they didn't even tell them.

 

Rose was being hit and the enemies strategy was to get Rose to hit them so UPN would roll Rose.

 

It's generally why people go for two protectors now, Noir probably wasn't attacked purely for that reason.

  • Upvote 4

[11:52 PM] Prefontaine: But Keegoz is actually bad. [11:52 PM] Prefontaine: He's my favorite bad leader though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Rose scenario was rather different lol.

 

UPN knew its protectorates were going to be hit due to a war they started and they didn't even tell them.

 

Rose was being hit and the enemies strategy was to get Rose to hit them so UPN would roll Rose.

 

It's generally why people go for two protectors now, Noir probably wasn't attacked purely for that reason.

UPN probably didn't know their protectorates were going to get hit. They didn't expect the beat down they got either.

 

They just shot themselves in the foot and lost their ability to uphold their promises. If it was anything other than an aggressive war I'd say it was hard luck.

 

Plainly though, it's terrible protection.

 

Rose signed a unilateral agreement that obligates it to defend its protectorates, and then didn't to try and avoid a losing war.

 

That's also terrible protection.

 

If I had to choose though, I'd vote Rose. Incompetence is better than duplicity.

Edited by Wilhelm the Demented
  • Upvote 1

One must imagine Sisyphus happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, UPN knew they were going to get hit. Pfeiffer literally told Saru it was going to happen ( He even admitted so on these boards ).

Getting hit is one thing. Getting beat down is another.
  • Upvote 1

One must imagine Sisyphus happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, UPN knew they were going to get hit.  Pfeiffer literally told Saru it was going to happen ( He even admitted so on these boards ).

 

Pfeiffer has a tendency to talk a lot, and not necessarily follow through. I spoke to BK about it, and they told me that their coalition won't be hitting our protectorates during the war. 

 

Best of luck to you SWF! You have a good future ahead of you. Stay cool.

Edited by Saru

200px-UPN.svg.png

Second in Command of UPN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just in case this isn't clear: Socialist Workers Front and The Evenstar Empire are still tied to Odd Squad under this Bloc....

GBE was the reform after the !@#$ who is banned decided to coup and disband the alliance. -.-

  • Upvote 1

:wub: -removed by thor- :wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Rose scenario was rather different lol.

 

UPN knew its protectorates were going to be hit due to a war they started and they didn't even tell them.

 

Rose was being hit and the enemies strategy was to get Rose to hit them so UPN would roll Rose.

 

It's generally why people go for two protectors now, Noir probably wasn't attacked purely for that reason.

 

http://whenwillrosedecide.com/

  • Upvote 5
77oKn5K.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my humble opinion I think it's waste of time and money to look for another alliance to protect you. 

It's my birthday today, and I'm 33!

That means only one thing...BRING IT IN, GUYS!

*every character from every game, comic, cartoon, TV show, movie, and book reality come in with everything for a HUGE party*

4nVL9WJ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pfeiffer has a tendency to talk a lot, and not necessarily follow through. I spoke to BK about it, and they told me that their coalition won't be hitting our protectorates during the war. 

 

Best of luck to you SWF! You have a good future ahead of you. Stay cool.

 

With what part did Mensa HQ not follow through?

Priest of Dio

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pfeiffer has a tendency to talk a lot, and not necessarily follow through. I spoke to BK about it, and they told me that their coalition won't be hitting our protectorates during the war. 

 

Best of luck to you SWF! You have a good future ahead of you. Stay cool.

 

So.... when did someone from Mensa say we weren't going to roll that bloc? Did you bother asking us?

Edited by TellUrGrlThx

☾☆

Priest of Dio


º¤ø„¤¤º°¨ ø„¸¸„¨ ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸
¨°º¤ø„¸ GOD EMPEROR DIO BRANDO¨°º¤ø„¸
¨°º¤ø„¸ DIO BRANDO GOD EMPEROR¨°º¤ø„¸
¨°º¤ø„¤¤º°¨ ø„¸¸„¨ ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸

6m0xPQ1.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, Saru is right, Pfeiffer does talk a big game some times, but it doesn't excuse him for not forewarning the protectorates.

 

Granted it's really not up to UPN to warn the Protectorates either.  All UPN did was agree to protect them, not hand feed them.  So while yes, UPN is terrible at protecting alliances during a big war, but they did assist them by keeping raiders at bay.

Edited by Buorhann
  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The normalizing of protectorate raiding is a pretty sick and evil thing in my opinion. You are trying to piss off a larger alliance without having the gall to actually just hit them, so you hit people who went to them to seek help with growth and the game overall. Keegoz is absolutely right in saying that it is the reason alliances normally go towards having two protectorates rather than one now, the issue that is going to cause though is: what happens when the two protectors have a dispute? The protectorate is always going to favor one over the other and it is going to put them in a bad spot.

 

Rose did regret the things done to people we protected a while back but we have worked things out with everyone involved and no one we were allied to at the time is mad at us over what happened, in fact none of them even backed out of the protectorate/treaty with that as a primary reason. The only protectorate that ended was an alliance that disbanded because the strain it had gone through from Mensa raiding it was too much for the new players. The only defense level treaty changed was that with Vanguard, who we still regard and friends and I talk to all the time. 

 

I knew about the chances of my protectorates getting hit and I went to every single one of them and talked to them about it, I'm sure people here can attest to that. If UPN had knowledge that it's protectorates were going to be raided (not to even mention it was over a war that UPN started) then yeah, it was their mistake. One I'm sure they won't make again after seeing the response given by Orbis. 

 

Feasting on young alliances that are full of new players and new faces to the world is an awful thing, it is going to kill new alliances, illustrate the people raiding them as tyrants, and make it that much harder for people to join the political scene. The primary thing here that makes this situation different is that Mensa claims they had told UPN they would be hitting the protectorates, and it was also to punish UPN for the aggressive action. 

 

I do think it is kind of absurd for the protectorates to assume they wouldn't be caught with the conflicts of their protector, despite all this. People play to win, and winning means making sure people aren't working to threaten you and your allies (which, to some, means punishing the friends of those who threatened you). But considering it was a counter-offensive strike - the greatest lesson to be learned is just don't sign on for an alliance to protect you if you think they are going to start a war that will pull you in, unless for some ungodly reason you're okay with it. The threat will always be there, no matter the probability. 

  • Upvote 6

[17:17:58] <&Ashland> I will give you hops if you say this phrase:

[17:18:13] <&Ashland> "Man, I really wish Rose had allied BoC a couple months ago when we had the chance instead of picking Vanguard."

[17:20:16] Man, I really wish Rose had allied BoC a couple months ago when we had the chance instead of picking Vanguard.

 

3fHp1YR.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-snip-

But that's the natural order in a game of politics and war where alliances try to accumulate treaties and protection to become untouchable. The more allies you try to enlist, the more casualties will be had once war inevitable happens.

 

The logical order isn't to then try to gain more protection or to make up moral rules for when it is or isn't okay to attack certain alliances. I mean I can't predict the future or alternative realities but I have a feeling this would have happened eventually,considering how most top alliances are so tied up in treaties that wars turn in to a game of jenga.

 

Maybe it's best for alliances to start thinking about why they feel a need to have protection, but also overseeing how they can avoid raids and how they can be prepared if they're ever swept in to war again. Because no amount of protection is ever gonna be enough to keep you away from conflicts.

Edited by Satisfriend
  • Upvote 4

It's my birthday today, and I'm 33!

That means only one thing...BRING IT IN, GUYS!

*every character from every game, comic, cartoon, TV show, movie, and book reality come in with everything for a HUGE party*

4nVL9WJ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be honest, I didn't read beyond the first sentence that Pubbie posted.  If you can't protect an alliance, don't take in protectorates and give them some sort of false hope.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<3 Bourhann

 

I guess that was kinda what I said? Just with... other stuff too. 

[17:17:58] <&Ashland> I will give you hops if you say this phrase:

[17:18:13] <&Ashland> "Man, I really wish Rose had allied BoC a couple months ago when we had the chance instead of picking Vanguard."

[17:20:16] Man, I really wish Rose had allied BoC a couple months ago when we had the chance instead of picking Vanguard.

 

3fHp1YR.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.