Thalmor Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 Phoenyx has agreed to come on to Thalmor Radio. I also spoke to Prefontaine on my show last week about him coming on and he agreed but I haven't followed up as my internet died Monday and has made everything harder to do. Show is tonight at 9 PM EST as always. So, about 10 hours from now. Thalmor Radio is P&W's only weekly radio show. Hosted by myself and cohosted by Shifty and Zig, we go live every Friday at 9 PM EST. We talk about thoughts on our minds, P&W news, and real life happenings. Discord invite: https://discord.gg/rcnJYAv 2 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roq Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 1 hour ago, Thalmor said: Phoenyx has agreed to come on to Thalmor Radio. I also spoke to Prefontaine on my show last week about him coming on and he agreed but I haven't followed up as my internet died Monday and has made everything harder to do. Show is tonight at 9 PM EST as always. So, about 10 hours from now. Thalmor Radio is P&W's only weekly radio show. Hosted by myself and cohosted by Shifty and Zig, we go live every Friday at 9 PM EST. We talk about thoughts on our minds, P&W news, and real life happenings. Discord invite: https://discord.gg/rcnJYAv Prefontaine and Phoenyx. A duo as old as an infant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenyx Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 One thing I must say, I reserve the right to leave early if I find it's too much of a "bash Phoenyx" session :-p. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalmor Posted November 20, 2020 Author Share Posted November 20, 2020 47 minutes ago, Phoenyx said: One thing I must say, I reserve the right to leave early if I find it's too much of a "bash Phoenyx" session :-p. You can ask any guest who has been on or any frequent listener. I am good to my guests and the audience generally is too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenyx Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 12 minutes ago, Thalmor said: You can ask any guest who has been on or any frequent listener. I am good to my guests and the audience generally is too. Ok, well guess we'll see how things go tonight :-). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeroofTime55 Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 Oh dear god 1 Quote Worst Poster Ever (2011) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zei-Sakura Alsainn Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 24 minutes ago, HeroofTime55 said: Oh dear god For once I agree with you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigbigadorlou Posted November 21, 2020 Share Posted November 21, 2020 For those that missed ithttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05b3ctcroog Time stamps in the description for ease of listening Cheers Quote Hey Krampus, the signature edit is under account settings. Actually, here's the link. https://forum.politicsandwar.com/index.php?/settings/signature/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted November 21, 2020 Share Posted November 21, 2020 I can see why you would give Phoenyx a platform to talk, but... seriously? Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Scarfalot Posted November 21, 2020 Share Posted November 21, 2020 Phoenyx...? Damn, I missed it... I would have been there too 😕 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeroofTime55 Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 20 hours ago, zigbigadorlou said: For those that missed ithttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05b3ctcroog Time stamps in the description for ease of listening Cheers Timestamp 32:39 is quite interesting. "...And this war is accomplishing exactly what it has [sic] intended to, which is the weakening of Quack.." in the middle of a discussion about how it was a supposed misunderstanding or something. Not sure who's voice that was. Quote Worst Poster Ever (2011) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Bolivar Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 2 hours ago, HeroofTime55 said: Timestamp 32:39 is quite interesting. "...And this war is accomplishing exactly what it has [sic] intended to, which is the weakening of Quack.." in the middle of a discussion about how it was a supposed misunderstanding or something. Not sure who's voice that was. What else is war meant to do? 🤔 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenyx Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 3 hours ago, HeroofTime55 said: Timestamp 32:39 is quite interesting. "...And this war is accomplishing exactly what it has [sic] intended to, which is the weakening of Quack.." in the middle of a discussion about how it was a supposed misunderstanding or something. Not sure who's voice that was. The voice you're referring to is zigbig's. You'll see that after he said it, I agreed with him. As Charles points out, that's what wars are meant to do. The real issue here, though, is whether any part of HM/TCW/Swamp had ever intended to attack Quack in an offensive role, rather than a defensive one. So far, I have found no evidence for this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Scarfalot Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 1 hour ago, Charles Bolivar said: What else is war meant to do? 🤔 Defend against someone trying to weaken you, maybe? 🤔 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Bolivar Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 37 minutes ago, Sir Scarfalot said: Defend against someone trying to weaken you, maybe? 🤔 War is just the continuation of politics by other means after all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 You're a crappy researcher lmao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenyx Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Prefonteen said: You're a crappy researcher lmao Assuming you're responding to my last post here, I'd say that's easy to say, much harder to prove. I've posted many threads here showing my detailed analysis of Boyce and Sphinx' logs, as well as Ronny's HM leader source. I haven't seen you do the same. One thing I -will- say though. Being a strong voice on the Quack side, you could perhaps get Boyce to reveal what he based his statement that HM/TCW/Swamp was going to attack in early December if you don't know already. I don't even see Sphinx saying anything that made it clear that they would attack first at all. Edited November 22, 2020 by Phoenyx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrienne Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 You do realize Boyce was an alliance leader allied to Sphinx, correct? He's not like some random Joe Sphinx talked to once. And therefore as an ally, he likely had many conversations relating to their respective alliances' security and plans, such as, I don't know, coalition building? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenyx Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 8 minutes ago, Adrienne said: You do realize Boyce was an alliance leader allied to Sphinx, correct? He's not like some random Joe Sphinx talked to once. And therefore as an ally, he likely had many conversations relating to their respective alliances' security and plans, such as, I don't know, coalition building? Yes, I was told that he is the leader of Terminus Est. Here is the thing- HM, TCW and Swamp all admit to building a -defensive- Coalition. Where I believe Boyce reached is in this idea that it was an -offensive- Coalition. I also think that his notion that they would attack Quack in early December was wild speculation. I have also noticed that Boyce doesn't seem to have participated here at all. Any idea as to why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigbigadorlou Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 15 hours ago, HeroofTime55 said: Timestamp 32:39 is quite interesting. "...And this war is accomplishing exactly what it has [sic] intended to, which is the weakening of Quack.." in the middle of a discussion about how it was a supposed misunderstanding or something. Not sure who's voice that was. Yeah that was me. Am I wrong? Whether the coalition was defensive or not, it was built based upon a perceived strength quack has. So the current war is serving its purpose of crushing Quack until its no longer a threat. And before quackers get angry at me, by threat, I mean that, at least for ca. 1 month, Quack will probably not be able to join up with 1 other bloc to defeat the other two. Quote Hey Krampus, the signature edit is under account settings. Actually, here's the link. https://forum.politicsandwar.com/index.php?/settings/signature/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenyx Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 (edited) 24 minutes ago, zigbigadorlou said: Yeah that was me. Am I wrong? Whether the coalition was defensive or not, it was built based upon a perceived strength quack has. So the current war is serving its purpose of crushing Quack until its no longer a threat. And before quackers get angry at me, by threat, I mean that, at least for ca. 1 month, Quack will probably not be able to join up with 1 other bloc to defeat the other two. I think you're on the money. The way I see it, the anti Quack forces didn't want this war, but now that it's started, they definitely intend to weaken Quack to the point that they no longer see them as that threatening. This can be done in at least 2 ways. One is the brute force method of just thinning out their armies and infra. Another may involve Quack conceding that this war may have stated based on at least some false information. Edited November 22, 2020 by Phoenyx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Bolivar Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 1 hour ago, Phoenyx said: I think you're on the money. The way I see it, the anti Quack forces didn't want this war, but now that it's started, they definitely intend to weaken Quack to the point that they no longer see them as that threatening. This can be done in at least 2 ways. One is the brute force method of just thinning out their armies and infra. Another may involve Quack conceding that this war may have stated based on at least some false information. Careful, your reroll mask is slipping 👍 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenyx Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 7 minutes ago, Charles Bolivar said: Careful, your reroll mask is slipping 👍 Nothing to be careful about, since I'm not a reroll. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigbigadorlou Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 15 minutes ago, Charles Bolivar said: Careful, your reroll mask is slipping 👍 There's literally an audio file posted in this thread for you to compare to if you suspect something. 1 hour ago, Phoenyx said: I think you're on the money. The way I see it, the anti Quack forces didn't want this war, but now that it's started, they definitely intend to weaken Quack to the point that they no longer see them as that threatening. This can be done in at least 2 ways. One is the brute force method of just thinning out their armies and infra. Another may involve Quack conceding that this war may have stated based on at least some false information. Nah this war will end in 1 of 2 ways, I think. 1. Quack surrendering to meme terms or 2. internal fighting/drama causing a coalition break up. I highly doubt #2 unless someone leaks some major opsec. Quote Hey Krampus, the signature edit is under account settings. Actually, here's the link. https://forum.politicsandwar.com/index.php?/settings/signature/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenyx Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 25 minutes ago, zigbigadorlou said: There's literally an audio file posted in this thread for you to compare to if you suspect something. Nah this war will end in 1 of 2 ways, I think. 1. Quack surrendering to meme terms or 2. internal fighting/drama causing a coalition break up. I highly doubt #2 unless someone leaks some major opsec. meme terms? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.