Sir Scarfalot Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 Just now, Noctis Anarch Caelum said: Personally I think these grace period when dropping allies to give them some time to find new allies is alright with me. Would be kind of mean to just announce you've cancelled on them & they're open for mass raiding. That's what the standard 72 hours is for; 720 hours is decidedly non-standard 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sphinx Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 (edited) I may have just overdosed on schadenfreude..... If you can't find anybody Pantheon, you're always welcome to actually complete the merge and join tCW. Edited April 8, 2019 by Sphinx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
True King Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 Just now, Sir Scarfalot said: That's what the standard 72 hours is for; 720 hours is decidedly non-standard Standard on treaties is a funny thing; because there is no universal standard. Somebody could make it 24 hours, a week or even a month+. Also personally I just can't bring myself to care about them protecting these alliances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zei-Sakura Alsainn Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 35 minutes ago, Avakael said: I don't see why we should throw them directly to the wolves. I don't see why you should keep an incompetent supersized micro alive either, and I daresay mine is the more reasonable question in a world of protected incompetent micros. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Scarfalot Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 Just now, Noctis Anarch Caelum said: Standard on treaties is a funny thing; because there is no universal standard. Somebody could make it 24 hours, a week or even a month+. Also personally I just can't bring myself to care about them protecting these alliances. Sure, sure, but that doesn't change the fact that 720 hours is unusual. Justified? Maybe. Necessary? Arguable. Within their rights? Of course, assuming it's at least as long as the cancellation period that was agreed on in the initial treaty (pretty sure it wasn't 720 hours but I rather doubt it was more). Unusual? Heck yes, and that deserves comment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avakael Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 It's definitely unusual to have such a long cancellation period. It's also unusual to cancel on an alliance when you're their only MD level ally. The grace period is so they aren't screwed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zei-Sakura Alsainn Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 They're screwed already. It's pantheon. They've been screwed for well over a year. All you're doing is once again delaying a plummet to their long overdue death. 1 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avakael Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 9 minutes ago, Akuryo said: They're screwed already. It's pantheon. They've been screwed for well over a year. All you're doing is once again delaying a plummet to their long overdue death. Then let it not be said that we didn't do everything we possibly could, other than allowing them to live with their parents past the age of 35. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegoz Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 1 hour ago, Avakael said: I don't see why we should throw them directly to the wolves. Let's be honest, you expect no one to sign them in 30 days of noteworthiness. We don't expect it either. So in essence you're delaying the inevitable. I really struggle to find a reason you'd do it other than making yourself feel somewhat less guilty over the fate that they now are moving towards. 2 2 Quote [11:52 PM] Prefontaine: But Keegoz is actually bad. [11:52 PM] Prefontaine: He's my favorite bad leader though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avakael Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 4 minutes ago, Keegoz said: Let's be honest, you expect no one to sign them in 30 days of noteworthiness. We don't expect it either. So in essence you're delaying the inevitable. I really struggle to find a reason you'd do it other than making yourself feel somewhat less guilty over the fate that they now are moving towards. We just tried to be the best damn parents we could be. Nobody told us about Fortnite until it was too late. 4 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leopold von Habsburg Posted April 8, 2019 Author Share Posted April 8, 2019 23 minutes ago, Keegoz said: Let's be honest, you expect no one to sign them in 30 days of noteworthiness. We don't expect it either. So in essence you're delaying the inevitable. I really struggle to find a reason you'd do it other than making yourself feel somewhat less guilty over the fate that they now are moving towards. It's something we told them we'd do and we are sticking with it. The 72 hour cancelation clause is a minimum. Like has been previously stated Pantheon has been dealing with their internals for the past little while and their FA has taken a back seat. I'm not exactly a huge proponent of grace periods but in this case it was warranted due to their lack of allies and If Pantheon doesn't use this month to get their affairs in order and prepare for the inevitable well we can at least say we tried. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zei-Sakura Alsainn Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 31 minutes ago, Avakael said: Then let it not be said that we didn't do everything we possibly could, other than allowing them to live with their parents past the age of 35. Loooool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
True King Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 30 minutes ago, Keegoz said: Let's be honest, you expect no one to sign them in 30 days of noteworthiness. We don't expect it either. So in essence you're delaying the inevitable. I really struggle to find a reason you'd do it other than making yourself feel somewhat less guilty over the fate that they now are moving towards. They have 30 days to merge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zei-Sakura Alsainn Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 Just now, Leopold von Habsburg said: It's something we told them we'd do and we are sticking with it. The 72 hour cancelation clause is a minimum. Like has been previously stated Pantheon has been dealing with their internals for the past little while and their FA has taken a back seat. I'm not exactly a huge proponent of grace periods but in this case it was warranted due to their lack of allies and If Pantheon doesn't use this month to get their affairs in order and prepare for the inevitable well we can at least say we tried. Once again this story about not having time to handle their FA while having time to sign like a dozen protectorates. I think it's more likely nobody wants to sign them and rightfully so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leopold von Habsburg Posted April 8, 2019 Author Share Posted April 8, 2019 1 minute ago, Akuryo said: Once again this story about not having time to handle their FA while having time to sign like a dozen protectorates. I think it's more likely nobody wants to sign them and rightfully so. Protectorates kind of come to you, you don't really have to work to get those treaties haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
True King Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 I could maybe get Pantheon a treaty if they accepted me as their leader ( ) though currently they seem to have a leadership void instability; which is a problem for them. Although if Rose sticks with t$; that wouldn't leave many top alliances left to potentially align. So who knows if they'll find something, but they should probably do something to change their image and try getting into alignment with a new sphere. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Radoje Posted April 8, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted April 8, 2019 3 hours ago, Buorhann said: In addition, a seven hundred and twenty hour notice of termination, effective from the time of this post, was given to PANTHEON (NYSE:PAN). lol wut. It gives Pantheon enough time to get couped at least 2 more times. 16 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zei-Sakura Alsainn Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 1 hour ago, Noctis Anarch Caelum said: I could maybe get Pantheon a treaty if they accepted me as their leader ( ) though currently they seem to have a leadership void instability; which is a problem for them. Although if Rose sticks with t$; that wouldn't leave many top alliances left to potentially align. So who knows if they'll find something, but they should probably do something to change their image and try getting into alignment with a new sphere. lol Pfft, get on my level! I could get as many as 3! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theodosius Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 Now Pantheon and TCW should hook up and make a bloc together. 30 Day Bloc. 3 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bezzers Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 Just now, Theodosius said: Now Pantheon and TCW should hook up and make a bloc together. 30 Day Bloc. It'd be like two halves of a whole finally coming together again. Could we handle such an explosion of power? Quote Roll Squeegee pact with Redarmy and Ameyuri Blues Brothers pact with Redarmy Leader of the Elyion Resistance. If it's backed by NPO, you know it's evil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theodosius Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 1 minute ago, Bezzers said: It'd be like two halves of a whole finally coming together again. Could we handle such an explosion of power? Anything less would be disappointing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bezzers Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 4 minutes ago, Theodosius said: Anything less would be disappointing. Then I'm ready to be disappointed Quote Roll Squeegee pact with Redarmy and Ameyuri Blues Brothers pact with Redarmy Leader of the Elyion Resistance. If it's backed by NPO, you know it's evil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyDLegend Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 6 hours ago, Sketchy said: I assume there is more than this. Points to what sketchy said previously... Good luck to pantheon on their future endeavors and I hope they’ll succeed ❤️ Quote Former Manager t$ and Director of R&D Former Director of Finance, Security in e$ Founder of The Prate Syndicate(test server) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan1 Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 @Leopold von HabsburgCan you please explain what will happen to Pantheon without their protector? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avakael Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 15 minutes ago, Ryan1 said: @Leopold von HabsburgCan you please explain what will happen to Pantheon without their protector? Have you ever watched that scene from Futurama where Fry's dog waits for him 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.