Jump to content
Rache Olderen

From the corner of a Dutch tavern...

Recommended Posts

I'm just happy to see one CS topic that didn't completely butcher the Bible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Careful Acadia. They sometimes forget about this part

Like NPO's first time?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No. More the senate isn't a puppet or a simple figurehead for the leader like it would be in some alliances. I don't control the Senate or what it decides. When it comes to declaring war and deciding treaties they have executive power. Which means they must be people who can think for themselves and produce their own opinions and that our democracy must be functional.

 

I will have you know our senate is the most powerful body in BK. Curu is really the Senates puppet, don't sub-tweet us like this Rache, I thought we were friends.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just happy to see one CS topic that didn't completely butcher the Bible.

There was killing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just happy to see one CS topic that didn't completely butcher the Bible.

Begone infidel!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, as this was posted while I wasn't around, glad to be working with CS!

And for the record, the treaty was in the works before the war started, but the announcement got a little delayed by all the other events happening :P

 

o/ Acadia

o/ Cornerstone

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will have you know our senate is the most powerful body in BK. Curu is really the Senates puppet, don't sub-tweet us like this Rache, I thought we were friends.

How times have changed, I remember the days when Lordstrum ruled with an iron fist and the senate just rubber stamped stuff  :v  :v

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, as this was posted while I wasn't around, glad to be working with CS!

And for the record, the treaty was in the works before the war started, but the announcement got a little delayed by all the other events happening :P

 

o/ Acadia

o/ Cornerstone

Cant you post it the same time as your dow?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love how TKR talked shit about their own ally in this thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love how TKR talked shit about their own ally in this thread

You mean the ally who backstabbed them ?? 

 

Also nice to see people becoming friends after getting rolled by t$ so what's next ?? LOLedaeron-CS treaty ?? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean the ally who backstabbed them ??

 

Also nice to see people becoming friends after getting rolled by t$ so what's next ?? LOLedaeron-CS treaty ??

Is signing Acadia a backstab or am I missing something?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is signing Acadia a backstab or am I missing something?

declaring war on one of the closest ally of your ally without any sort of provocation is backstab :) [given that ally of ally and CS were part of one of the biggest econ project of orbis just 4 months ago] 

 

Not to mention they were part of the planning team which decided to attack on TKR and they knew it very well but sadly they decided to see their allies getting rolled. 

 

If this is not backstab I don't know what is :) 

Edited by Harry Potter
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

declaring war on one of the closest ally of your ally without any sort of provocation is backstab :) [given that ally of ally and CS were part of one of the biggest econ project of orbis just 4 months ago] 

 

The TI thing is scummy, imo, but ultimately CS doesn't owe t$ anything. Cornerstone was also directly involved on the planning of a hit on TKR, their ally, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The TI thing is scummy, imo, but ultimately CS doesn't owe t$ anything. Cornerstone was also directly involved on the planning of a hit on TKR, their ally, though.

forgot mentioned that first time :P edited that post 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see. Why doesn't TKR just drop the treaty then?

 

Perhaps they will. Why didn't CS drop the treaty before making those plans? :P

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps they will. Why didn't CS drop the treaty before making those plans? :P

I suppose that's fair enough. I just wish people would drop treaties more often.
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The TI thing is scummy, imo, but ultimately CS doesn't owe t$ anything. Cornerstone was also directly involved on the planning of a hit on TKR, their ally, though.

TKR have been involved in the planning of a hit on their ally before.  Did you have an issue when your other allies were involved in planning hits on their allies since there are multiple instances or was it okay then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TKR have been involved in the planning of a hit on their ally before.  Did you have an issue when your other allies were involved in planning hits on their allies since there are multiple instances or was it okay then?

 

Using NPO-TKR as an example, at least? The honest answer is both. I do think they should have cancelled you before planning that war. But I also think there's differences because there wasn't a shared history in your treaty like there was with TKR-CS, and the communication went sour from the NPO end (imo) before they made that move.

Edited by Spaceman Thrax

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Using NPO-TKR as an example, at least? The honest answer is both. I do think they should have cancelled you before planning that war. But I also think there's differences because there wasn't a shared history in your treaty like there was with TKR-CS, and the communication went sour from the NPO end (imo) before they made that move.

BK-UPN would be another.  Again, it seems it was different when it was an alliance you had issues with and it benefited you and not okay when it didn't. That's a fairly regular pattern of thinking, but it may be good to remove your bias here. Who's to say CS-TKR communication didn't go sour? In either case, the allies in question saw themselves as being on opposing sides and it was a consequence of that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TKR have been involved in the planning of a hit on their ally before.  Did you have an issue when your other allies were involved in planning hits on their allies since there are multiple instances or was it okay then?

Should have canceled you postwar but it would have been a PR hit either way, you would have spun it one way or another so we can agree to disagree. /shrug

 

I would argue the situations are different as well; you signed UPN, pushing you more and more towards Paracov even though we told you exactly what we thought of UPN and why you shouldn't do it. In this case with CS, they were the ones that signed away from us and also planned a hit on us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.