Jump to content

[Treaty] Why NAP when you can sleep?


Vein
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Who Me said:

Silly person, it's never a 1v1.

I hope it isn't a 1v1, but let's be honest, many of them are gonna sit around and gather pixels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DragonKnight said:

I hope it isn't a 1v1, but let's be honest, many of them are gonna sit around and gather pixels.

why do you hope it isn't?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Tartarus said:

when you nuke, or when you fight?

Both is good, but i do have a preference for the latter since it is not as one dimensional. Unfortunately the fighting phase doesn't last that long, wasn't there supposed to be a beige update about it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Vein said:

be fair and maybe nuke the other 3 spheres as well for signing it, Eclipse weren't the only one who did it. Perhaps also go visit the other only sphere who signed M treaty with the only other biggest sphere not once, but twice then followed afterwards with a 3.5 month NAP after a one day war. Why are most of the playerbase in this game so stupid? I only feel for the members kek

Trust me, I would. Alex should just allow everyone to buy 10 nukes a day at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Sketchy said:

It's only a bad NAP when it doesn't include TKR.

I'm sure @BigMorf would be singing a different tune if the Syndicate/Eclipse/ODOO nap that he supported got through. 

It's only bad because we decided to not be rolled for the games entertainment.

  • Upvote 2

[11:52 PM] Prefontaine: But Keegoz is actually bad. [11:52 PM] Prefontaine: He's my favorite bad leader though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Alexio15 said:

Yay I get to buy more cities… oh wait

I have it on the authority of RON, that war is dead and no one will fight ever again. They've never been wrong before, so I think you're fine.

[11:52 PM] Prefontaine: But Keegoz is actually bad. [11:52 PM] Prefontaine: He's my favorite bad leader though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The players of this game continue to get more pathetic with each passing day.

If we did this, I'd lose all respect for gov. Long NAPs do not benefit the game, they don't benefit ordinary players and all they really serve to do is continue to improve the already over-inflated growth of a few players and alliances. I am sure a while ago we all agreed to have no more NAPS; of course, this idea died the moment the first person felt threatened, but it was certainly a lovely idea. Now somebody seems to have made a decision within the game that there should be no more war. I just hope it sticks as well as the grand commitment to have no more naps.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.