Jump to content

Protectorate Rabbit Hole


Radoje
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, Hilmes said:

Damn, TKR trying manufacture drama hot out of the gate. I see you boys, I see you.  That resentment over the blasting must have been something fierce to start it off this early though. Fine by me.  

Woah dude, way to be defensive :D 
I was jesting with you with some town foolery, didn't realize you were so conscious of your protectorate issue to take it so close to heart :P 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe t$ are cognitive of their current protectorate situation. I know Kayser was looking at reevaluating to ensure that the protectorates and t$ are in the best possible situation while also trying to improve the health of Orbis.

With that said, this thread is awesome and hilarious. 10/10 Rado.

  • Like 2

image.gif.d80770bf646703bba00c14ad52088af9.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Radoje said:

 

The "it was just a joke bro",  defense is old dude,

As others have pointed out, there are a number of relationships across Orbis that do not work the way some think they should work.That is the nature of relationships.  That you chose to focus on TS in particular says something to me. My reaction in kind should be no surprise. 

 

Side note, neat stuff from Pre and not all the surprising knowing the dude (Panty-san). Safe to say, yeah, we had no knowledge of this plan. But it would have made for a fun alternate universe. 

Edited by Hilmes

PvczX3n.jpg?1

 

“ Life before death. Strength before weakness. Journey before destination. â€

–The First Ideal of the Windrunners,

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hilmes said:

The "it was just a joke bro",  defense is old dude,

As others have pointed out, there are a number of relationships across Orbis that do not work the way some think they should work.That is the nature of relationships.  That you chose to focus on TS in particular says something to me. My reaction in kind should be no surprise. 

 

Side note, neat stuff from Pre and not all the surprising knowing the dude (Panty-san). Safe to say, yeah, we had no knowledge of this plan. But it would have made for a fun alternate universe. 

You just sound salty to me tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/17/2019 at 3:36 PM, Micchan said:

Game needs restrictions on treaties

1. If you are a protectorate you can't protect another alliance, makes no sense protecting someone if you can't protect yourself

2. Max number of treaties, you have to think a bit more before making and ally and should reduce the size of maxispheres so it's easy to have a small scale war without going into a full world war, also makes easier to be paperless without being a huge upper tier alliance (CoS, Grumpy, SK, etc.)

Both should also reduce the number of micros because if it's harder to find a protector it's easy to see the micro die, for the best new alliances should be easier to find protectors so the worst micros are the one that die or not even start

Jesus you cry a lot. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

STFU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.