Alveron Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 Well done BK. Not going to lie, I thought y'all were just a bunch of shitposters, but your coordination has been truly impressive. We are in fact a bunch of shitposters. But we are not just a bunch of shitposters. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jodo Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 gg BK. Also my condolences for the strain this war is putting on your relationship with UPN.Even best friends have bad days. We'll work it out. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greatkitteh Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 Even best friends have bad days. We'll work it out.Fify (I don't actually support getting rid of the treaty for the matter) Quote :sheepy: :sheepy: Greatkitteh was here.- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jodo Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 Fify (I don't actually support getting rid of the treaty for the matter) I stand by my original statement. Because I love you. /me pets kitteh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greatkitteh Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 (edited) I stand by my original statement. Because I love you. /me pets kitteh See arguably worst expect the Alpha-TS former treaty- yeah that suckedfriends make up. I blame GPA. Edited June 14, 2016 by greatkitteh Quote :sheepy: :sheepy: Greatkitteh was here.- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordship Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 Not sure why people are so shocked about an hitting an ally's ally. Look at the web lmao everyone is connected in some fashion, so it is literally bound to happen. With the way the web is now, you're going to end up pissing off an ally while helping another ally out, unless of course you cancel the treaties. 1 Quote Life before Death. Strength before Weakness. Journey before Destination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Winchell Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 I didn't consider DEIC in that mix up. I think we found the master. Quick, someone declare on DEIC and cut the head off before they wreck us!Can confirm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheedows Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 Well done BK. Not going to lie, I thought y'all were just a bunch of shitposters, but your coordination has been truly impressive. what about coordinated shitposting 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foltest Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 what about coordinated shitposting Our true power. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pangui Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 (edited) sad to see this happen. Edited June 15, 2016 by Pangui Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
丂ħ̧i̧₣ɫ̵γ͘ ̶™ Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 what about coordinated shitposting We got ayy lmaos at our call centers standing by 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 sad to see this happen. Shouldn't be sad playboi! The UPN-BK relations have been tested in harsher environments than before! This should be nothing! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphus Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 Shouldn't be sad playboi! The UPN-BK relations have been tested in harsher environments than before! This should be nothing!Yeah, but BK has never tested UPN's commitment until now. It usually goes the other way around so UPN is naturally going to take it a little harder now than BK has in the past, repeatedly. 4 Quote One must imagine Sisyphus happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 Yeah, but BK has never tested UPN's commitment until now. It usually goes the other way around so UPN is naturally going to take it a little harder now than BK has in the past, repeatedly. We are very good friends of BK and are very happy to help them with their UPN relationship down through it's darkest times! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
丂ħ̧i̧₣ɫ̵γ͘ ̶™ Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 (edited) Yeah, but BK has never tested UPN's commitment until now. It usually goes the other way around so UPN is naturally going to take it a little harder now than BK has in the past, repeatedly. It's practically an open relationship with UPN. We both have a need to slayy. We want dat purp, they want the big black knights. Edited June 15, 2016 by Shifty Stranger 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greatkitteh Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 It's practically an open relationship with UPN. We both have a need to slayy. We want dat purp, they want the big black knights. GPA is ripping us apart to take over Orbis. It's not too late to declare on Mensa. Quote :sheepy: :sheepy: Greatkitteh was here.- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foltest Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 GPA is ripping us apart to take over Orbis. It's not too late to declare on Mensa. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lL2ZwXj1tXM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pangui Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 (edited) Shouldn't be sad playboi! The UPN-BK relations have been tested in harsher environments than before! This should be nothing! It hasn't. UPN has never planned an aggressive war against BK itself. Oktoberfest we warred tS, not BK, and we didn't want BK to burn. Bored War we answered the call of our ally in VE, and our hand was forced when our ally got declared on. Arrgh War BK ignores us completely when we are preemptively hit by Arrgh. Now they plan a war in which UPN is on of the targets. So it's unfornuate. Edited June 15, 2016 by Pangui Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boony Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 It hasn't. UPN has never planned an aggressive war against BK itself. Oktoberfest we warred tS, not BK, and we didn't want BK to burn. Bored War we answered the call of our ally in VE, and our hand was forced when our ally got declared on. Arrgh War BK ignores us completely when we are preemptively hit by Arrgh. Now they plan a war in which UPN is on of the targets. So it's unfornuate. Stop being dense. It's getting pretty sad. UPN flat out lied to BK during Oktoberfest when they told BK that they were going to demilitirze. UPN planned a war against tS, BK ally, knowing BK would defend tS. During the bored war, you did not hit SK whom activated your treaty. Instead, you hit TKR, BK bloc mate, whom did NOT activate your treaty. I don't mind actual arguments, but don't spew bullshit. Kthx 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Filthy Fifths Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 It hasn't. UPN has never planned an aggressive war against BK itself. Oktoberfest we warred tS, not BK, and we didn't want BK to burn. Bored War we answered the call of our ally in VE, and our hand was forced when our ally got declared on. Arrgh War BK ignores us completely when we are preemptively hit by Arrgh. Now they plan a war in which UPN is on of the targets. So it's unfornuate. Black on Black crime is never the answer. Quote "In an honest service there is thin commons, low wages, and hard labor; in this, plenty and satiety, pleasure and ease, liberty and power; and who would not balance creditor on this side, when all the hazard that is run for it, at worst, is only a sour look or two at choking. No, a merry life and a short one, shall be my motto." - Bartholomew "Black Bart" Roberts Green Enforcement Agency will rise again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pangui Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 (edited) Stop being dense. It's getting pretty sad. UPN flat out lied to BK during Oktoberfest when they told BK that they were going to demilitirze. UPN planned a war against tS, BK ally, knowing BK would defend tS. During the bored war, you did not hit SK whom activated your treaty. Instead, you hit TKR, BK bloc mate, whom did NOT activate your treaty. I don't mind actual arguments, but don't spew bullshit. Kthx SK attacked NAC with "our side vs there side". If NAC is on "otherside" so are we. TKR was an alliance on that otherside, we answered the oAP part of our MDoAP with VE to hit them. NAC did not activate the treaty, but declaring on them meant that we wouldn't stand still. When I asked BK why they where militizing, I was told for defensive purposes. I won't log dump because I don't sell people out, but BK flat out lied when I told them what our plan of action was for this upcoming conflict. You can bring up historical events, but UPN attempted to be proactive, and I was met with a flat out lie, and apparently a planned attack. Edited June 15, 2016 by Pangui Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boony Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 (edited) SK attacked NAC with "our side vs there side". If NAC is on "otherside" so are we. TKR was an alliance on that otherside, we answered the oAP part of our MDoAP with VE to hit them. NAC did not activate the treaty, but declaring on them meant that we wouldn't stand still. When I asked BK why they where militizing, I was told for defensive purposes. I won't log dump because I don't sell people out, but BK flat out lied when I told them what our plan of action was for this upcoming conflict. You can bring up historical events, but UPN attempted to be proactive, and I was met with a flat out lie, and apparently a planned attack. The attack on NAC was because of miscommunication. We attempted to broker peace but UPN would accept nothing less the SK leaving the war completely. We offered reps and peace wit NAC. Also, you went into old stuff first. I'm just clarifying the accurate version of events. Edit: holy shit did you just try to argue that SK saying "our side vs theres" gave you justification to hit TKR? *facepalms*. Guess you're Steve 2.0 Edited June 15, 2016 by Boony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 It hasn't. UPN has never planned an aggressive war against BK itself. Oktoberfest we warred tS, not BK, and we didn't want BK to burn. Bored War we answered the call of our ally in VE, and our hand was forced when our ally got declared on. Arrgh War BK ignores us completely when we are preemptively hit by Arrgh. Now they plan a war in which UPN is on of the targets. So it's unfornuate. BK warred NPO, not UPN, and they didn't want UPN to burn. They were lied to multiple times already. So it's unfortunate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 You can bring up historical events, but UPN attempted to be proactive, and I was met with a flat out lie, and apparently a planned attack. Sucks when it happens to you amirite? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 Alright. I'm calling it here - 11 pages. 1 Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.