Glorton Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 While I love to nitpick at how you guys are going about it. I actually really like your point here. Well, I know at least not to become inactive I suppose? Not really. A lot of people log in when they get the war email, hence all the truces. Most toss out some naval, missile or just take the peace. So getting people online more is sort of like a public service? See we prevent people from going inactive and bring the inactives back to the game. We deserve a medal if anything Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warpool Posted February 22, 2016 Author Share Posted February 22, 2016 I'd just nuke you. Slower but much more effective than missiles. Nahh, a good raider picks their targets carefully and the more one sided the fight the better. But don't brag about how good you are at it or how merciful you are. You're pressing the 'Easy' button. As someone else said, a mechanics change and you're business model gets a whole lot less profitable. Let's see where you are in a few months. Well all I hear is I should take advantage of this! Perhaps it is time Mr.Clooney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsberger Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 See we prevent people from going inactive and bring the inactives back to the game. We deserve a medal if anything Except for you attacked me when i was inactive for 3 hours Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorton Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 you should be active every hour 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warpool Posted February 22, 2016 Author Share Posted February 22, 2016 Except for you attacked me when i was inactive for 3 hours Eh this post is turning into a people grumbling. Clooney, sell down a bit please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorton Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 I think he just wants to complain on the forums. Much easier then getting rolled Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samdoo Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Honestly I don't get the people who cry about this high city low infra approach. Majority of the people I hit have little to no military, the same thing can be done by a fully armed 8 city nation to another sitting ducks 8 city nation,and all the more effectively due to more tanks. You can't complain when you're sitting with no military yourself. You don't want to be raided? Keep a moderate standing military. No one will bother raiding you. For eg, look at Mensa. Who in their right mind would bother raiding them? This is completely true tywin, a nation with full military will crush a nation with no military. Guess what though sitting with full military if a nation has more cities than you and less military. Would give them the same NS, Isn`t that right tywin... Guess what this more city nation can out buy your military too, declare then buy, and you can`t lose... Isn`t that right? Here comes the crazy part, mensa is using this heavy city without increasing infra now too. Oh you mean keep a full standing military, Hope you don`t get hit first... Right?? 2 nations with full military the nation that attacks first wins, even with the same city count, I`m seeing only 1 strategy present, its click first. Start 3 offensive wars, there isn`t much penalty since turning the battle would require a minimum of 2 nations at full military to join the fight, the nations that are engaged are useless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asierith Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Hahahaha. You should have a thread for people complaining. It's funny how quickly people jump online when their 1800 infra cities are getting attacked. You guys act as a guy at the back of the pack kicking those who get lazy. o/ political pirates but seriously, I'm active so don't raid me 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8mrgrim8 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 man, sucks for all the new players Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asierith Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 All the members are high score. They don't attack the small fry, but instead go for bigger alliances with juicy economic nations. They then eat up the counter attackers as well. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 You got a little brown on your nose, Asierith. 1 Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asierith Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 (edited) You got a little brown on your nose, Asierith. Nah I don't. I just know when someone's got something right. I could be salty and a pixel hugger and complain about how my alliance is being attacked, but no. They are just playing the game, and are a part of it. Doesn't mean they don't piss me off at times, but If you want to make them go away, then you can waste the resources. I'm not going to, unless the order comes from above. Edited February 22, 2016 by Asierith 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nie Li Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 This is completely true tywin, a nation with full military will crush a nation with no military. Guess what though sitting with full military if a nation has more cities than you and less military. Would give them the same NS, Isn`t that right tywin... Guess what this more city nation can out buy your military too, declare then buy, and you can`t lose... Isn`t that right? Here comes the crazy part, mensa is using this heavy city without increasing infra now too. Oh you mean keep a full standing military, Hope you don`t get hit first... Right?? 2 nations with full military the nation that attacks first wins, even with the same city count, I`m seeing only 1 strategy present, its click first. Start 3 offensive wars, there isn`t much penalty since turning the battle would require a minimum of 2 nations at full military to join the fight, the nations that are engaged are useless. Which why u have to options. Attack first and then also regret it or just build out of our war range. Quote Protector of Low tier nations, from Empire of Spades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vosunda Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 I'd just nuke you. Slower but much more effective than missiles. Nahh, a good raider picks their targets carefully and the more one sided the fight the better. But don't brag about how good you are at it or how merciful you are. You're pressing the 'Easy' button. As someone else said, a mechanics change and you're business model gets a whole lot less profitable. Let's see where you are in a few months. You'd nuke someone with 300 infra cities? lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorton Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 You'd nuke someone with 300 infra cities? lol its the thought that counts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurdanak Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 TL;DR... We are abusing a factor in the game and bullying a majority of the player base until the game admin can make a meaningful change to stop us. Join our fun... cause there is no running. "Abusing" or "taking advantage of"? Same difference, I suppose; it just depends on which side you're watching this all from. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 (edited) You'd nuke someone with 300 infra cities? lol Granted it'd be a massive cost loss, it's still effective for the removal of 2 improvements. Remove enough important improvements and they'll be forced to rebuild/rearrange that city. Plus if a power plant disappears, that completely screws up their city/improvement advantage. Edited February 23, 2016 by Buorhann 1 Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
durmij Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Granted it'd be a massive cost loss, it's still effective for the removal of 2 improvements. Remove enough important improvements and they'll be forced to rebuild/rearrange that city. Plus if a power plant disappears, that completely screws up their city/improvement advantage. Cost could be offset by crowdfunding lol Quote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjI4ROuPyuY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUUEHv8GHcE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiki Mod Dr Rush Posted February 23, 2016 Wiki Mod Share Posted February 23, 2016 Here comes the crazy part, mensa is using this heavy city without increasing infra now too. We've been building wide instead tall since we got here, this isn't news. Also your confusing a tactical build with remaining in the shit tier, they are very different things. 1 Quote 23:38 Skable that's why we don't want Rose involved, so we can take the m all for ourselves 23:39 [] but Mensa is the cute girl at the school dance and she's only dancing with us right now to get our friend jealous 23:39 [] If Rose comes in and gives Mensa what she wants, she'll just toss us aside and forget we ever existed 23:39 zombie_lanae yeah I do hope we can keep having them all to ourselves 23:40 zombie_lanae I know it's selfish but I want all their love 6:55 PM <+Isolatar> Praise Dio Pubstomper|BNC [20:01:55] Rose wouldn't plan a hit on Mensa because it would be !@#$ing stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnl023 Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Tbh PP is more effective than most alliances in P&W, even though we non-raiders hate admitting it. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Cost could be offset by crowdfunding lol BRB, setting up a GoFundMe page for nuke building. 1 Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Joe Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Except for you attacked me when i was inactive for 3 hours Yeah but let's be real, you had it coming. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fasolt Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 (edited) TL;DR... We are abusing a factor in the game and bullying a majority of the player base until the game admin can make a meaningful change to stop us Oh boo hoo hoo... You got run over because your alliances attackers worked quickly as a group and caught you by surprise. "Bullying a majority of the player base" I am heartfully sorry we hurt your feelings, buttercup. And I think you exaggerate just a little in that "majority of the player base" part LoL How bout this... We make a game change that doesnt allow raiding or attacking without prior permission given by the target... Will that make it all better? Edited February 24, 2016 by Fasolt 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AkAk Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Shouldn't there be a game change where you lose improvements when under a certain infra #? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diocletian Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Shouldn't there be a game change where you lose improvements when under a certain infra #? Would make sense no matter which way you looked at it, sure. Quote "The happiness of the people, and the peace of the empire, and the glory of the reign are linked with the fortune of the Army." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.