Jump to content

Odin

VIP
  • Content Count

    648
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

768 Upvote Apprentice

About Odin

  • Rank
    💎 Top-Fan

Contact Methods

  • AIM
  • MSN
    uses this shit
  • ICQ
    in the
  • Yahoo
    year
  • Jabber
    2014-2018?
  • Discord Name
    Odin

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location:
    Saxony
  • Interests
    You <3
  • Alliance Pip
    Terminus Est
  • Leader Name
    Odin
  • Nation Name
    Nordland
  • Nation ID
    5674
  • Alliance Name
    Afrika Korps

Recent Profile Visitors

5639 profile views
  1. Screenshot should be self-explanatory.
  2. This here was much more interesting tbh
  3. I think removing the swatstika below the palm tree doesn’t change the fact that it’s the source material. In that context it does, Pika. The AK flag used has an Iron Cross with "Afrika Korps" written in it and a Palm in the center. The Pic you have posted is a Palm with a swastika. Remove the damn swastika from there and it's a simple palm. Source material of the swastika is btw from your home region. I take you can't read at all. Or trying to search for problems where there are none. Where is even your personal problem with AK? I can see why you defend KT, and i help you doing that, but, my dear ex-alliance mate. If you suffer from seizures right now because some pictures on our alliance page are too hardcore, then please contact an admin. So? I admitted already that AK is connected, right in my first post in this thread here. I also said it's not indictable word anywhere in the world. Big surprise, we even have https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_Marshal_Rommel_Barracks,_Augustdorf Rommel barracks here (still that name, still in use.) Not everything you assume as bad is actually bad. Do a simple google search for Afrika Korps War Crimes. I see you know how evil the Nazis were, you can read up here then: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied_war_crimes_during_World_War_II . Yes, i know, a bit whataboutism, but only throw stones when you're free of sin as well. Ah right, you're Chinese. They were initially allied with the Nazis with support of von Falkenhausen. Current Mainland chinese are practically Nazis, ask anyone from HongKong. And gg for complaining about the flag design.
  4. And i think it does. It makes it a simple palm. The flag itself is based off the Third Reich war flag, which is based off the Imperial Navy flag, which is based off the flag of the Teutonic Order, which is based of the Cross of Jesu with an imperial eagle on it, which itself again has a roman origin. What's your problem with AK? I don't see a AK member anywhere riding the "KT man bad" train? Shout out to KT here, you're the good guys We boot when we boot. Our decisions to boot members isn't influenced by NPCs.
  5. One can find negative connotations everywhere if one wants. Great White North. Sounds like a Nazi plan as well. And some here are right, Afrika Korps is of course a product of the Third Reich, and some of our artworks are based on it. In that context AK could be conflicting with the "No Nazi related" names rule. But the Afrika Korps wasn't a political SS Unit, but a branch of the Army. See Wikipedia That name isn't forbidden anywhere. We're not using a Swastika or any other forbidden symbol as well. Using here german laws, which are the hardest anti-nazi laws world wide. By the standard of treating the word "Afrika Korps" as a political name of the NSDAP, we can as well treat the word "Luftwaffe" the same. Both have their origin in the time between 1933 and 1945. Luftwaffe was re-used and is still the name of the current german air force. Let the tears in your eyes for a moment. Africa and Corps, those word combines can't be the reason some here are unable to sleep in peace right? If so, please DM me, and we can talk about it, even about a rename. We're very tolerant in that regard and will find a solution together. I for one find the Mongol theme extremely offending. They offensively attacked the Knights Templar first, and no one complains about that, because... uh... Because it doesn't matter. As i wrote in the beginning. You can find everywhere offensive things if you want or if it's you hobby as Internet Warrior. And the child slave thing that Migraine wrote... It was stupid bullshit, written by 1 member of an alliance. Even tho it serves to enhance the bad reputation of an already super evil organisation, i'd prefer to treat people as individuums, no generalizing everyone
  6. Look at the Map. Different Battleground.
  7. I've fought a lot of my TEst brothers in this war, but don't talk shit about them... not always.😈 If they got your dislike already now, then they're doing something already right . @Zues I'd do it myself, but i've got range sickness in my old age. Can you Khorne-slap him for me?
  8. https://politicsandwar.com/alliance/id=4901 𝕴 𝖕𝖑𝖊𝖉𝖌𝖊 𝖒𝖞 𝖆𝖑𝖑𝖊𝖌𝖎𝖆𝖓𝖈𝖊 𝖙𝖔 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖋𝖑𝖆𝖌 𝖔𝖋 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝕷𝖊𝖔𝖕𝖔𝖑𝖉 𝖛𝖔𝖓 𝕳𝖆𝖇𝖘𝖇𝖚𝖗𝖌 𝕭𝖞 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝕺𝖑𝖉 𝕲𝖔𝖉𝖘 𝖆𝖓𝖉 𝕹𝖊𝖜 𝖂𝖎𝖙𝖍 𝖑𝖎𝖇𝖊𝖗𝖙𝖞 𝖆𝖓𝖉 𝖏𝖚𝖘𝖙𝖎𝖈𝖊 𝖋𝖔𝖗 𝖆𝖑𝖑.
  9. Is it us that doesn't want to end the war?
  10. I'm sure the top 5 have a spot at that table. And not sure what else you and maybe Buorhann meant. The guys with the most irrelevant forum spam? Please...
  11. You still being able to refill your nations when beiged let's me think your Warchests were so good, that we can't speak of an effective economical impact by Surfs Up. Also, economy in terms of Infra and money-making buildings aren't important for a Blitz. The main-source of Coalition A's damage was from the Blitz week. This isn't wrong tbh. Depends on the fact if the aggressor has repaired to pre-war Infra past the first war, or not. If you start a next war at status quo. No one of Coalition A will say (and no one of B believe) that your pre-war Infra is your standard post-war Infra. TEst was paperless. Of course it was opportunistic. See Sparta-Grumpy war what happens if we behaved like a regular bloc as a singe alliance. We never messed up a target, that statement is wrong. Talking about t$ hit on Grumpy maybe? That one was messed up. You probably mean our hit against Pantheon back then. I'd say it was quite succesfull and we got our peace. Until "losing one war". Yep, losing against the entire game, this war here is a joke compared to that gangbang. Even paperless alliances need their allies, we had none of them anymore, so we went our ways. Don't say gangbang. Everyone needs their repair phase to get the RoI right. I'm sure you would have otherwise. Well, i would have Everyone on our side started with standard pre-war Infra somewhere between 2k and 3k. While your side started with less than half of that. The initial military strength of anyone on our side didn't matter as long as you got the starter ITs, which wasn't hard when doing 5-10 city downdeclares with respective Aircraft amounts. I'm not saying KT and tGH aren't very strong alliances, and some of our side are.... well,... But a city difference big enough, can decide a war over a single daychange. For example, when i recently got downdeclared by Jim Beam, Seb and Akak, they removed my entire 2880 Air units to 0 when i was asleep for just 6 hours. We know, things get easy when your enemy is out of Air, other Units dont matter from this point onwards. Using the Surfs Up was of course an opportunity. Wouldn't the real retard not be the person that wouldn't grasp it after that leak? Nice stats are a byproduct of the situation, but they're your most beloved showpiece, hands down. Easy, take your nation and try to declare on a standard militarized 20+ nation of Coalition B now. Have fun. Also, Skae does an awesome job and the Gov position is well deserved. And if you check into the Statistics, i'm sure you can see AK being better than a lot of other alliances, no matter on which side, especially when considering we're even in peacetime barely a top20 alliance. So.... what was again the reason you allied them. Against whome where they supposed to be used? Or did you only get them in a double-pack, because neither Guardian nor Grumpy has the balls to do anything without uppertier gangbang. I'm mostly immune to Propaganda, since i've been here since Alpha and fought on every side... yes, even with TKR once. There's is no narrative on our side. There are just numbers, score calculations and the forum threads. And the way people in their spread their e-peen. If you say to someone he is "legimitately retarded", then the words of wisdom coming from your side are taken with a grain of salt. Why not? To keep the narrative positive for Coalition A, that's actually a genius move. I mean, the leak was old and supposed to be for a lame, peaceful Orbis. The situation changed by Surfs up, the leak was outdated. In the end it was simply and offensive war by Ketogg, Chaos and Rose with old leaks as CB. Those who didn't want war, raise their hands now. We had the guys that composed a war plan on -now- Coalition B side and we had the guys that actually reversed that plan and started an offensive war, Coalition A. It went from leak to next war, without trying to talk about this. Now we're here.
  12. Ketog, Chaos and Rose, each completely non-aligned to each other, can join a war together against a common foe, with CB "BK and N$O planning a war against them". ✅. Alright, everything's fine until here. N$O, a bit alligned to BK due to the treaty-web, is not allowed to declare a war against blocs, that used "BK and N$O planning a war against them". ❓ Where is the logic behind that? Doesn't need much brain matter to know who would have been rolled in the next or a bit later in the same war.... While I indeed condemn the content of that leak, attacking two smaller blocs like that, that original war itself has never happened. It was a "What if" case, if "Surfs Up" never had happened. The reality was another one: The first mentioned alliances, instead of dealing with it diplomatically, decided to use their low Infra situation to completely sweep over BK in an Offensive War. None of you know how tight the bonds between N$O and BK really were until it became necessary to bond again together, since the CB was one that was only a coin throw away to simply affect the other one. Any further complaints about the righteousness of anyone's war entry is by now just plain salt. Salt especially over the ingames war mechanics that can't simulate a "Desert Storm". The initial Blitz was nicely executed, really well done. I wondered sometimes if the 25% downdeclare range still exists. But in the end and finally coming to the topic of this thread: This war will go as long as we need to kill all the pixel-hugging whales on your side. Thanks to Ketog here for thinking they're an advantage. Against whom was this dual-joke idea of Guardian/Grumpy directed? As you can see, they're nothing but useless baggage starting round 2 if there's no counterpart on the enemy side. ...Happily building cities at war (from trade income) and bunkering up while the rest of you is bleeding.
  13. Case 1: So if anyone would have renamed their alliance to "Strean Investment Company", after Strea deleted Version 1, they'd have gotten their bank looted instead? Case 2: In case the above one wouldn't happen, would it if Strea joins them as a member before getting beiged? Tough luck indeed, but who in their right mind would guess that the unique alliance ID is the less important (between name and ID).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.