Grillick Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Cool your jets, mate. Nobody is anti-war, just pro-trolling. SPOILER ALERT: ^ Leaker right there. Quote "It's hard to be a team player when you're omnipotent." - Q Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mutant Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 SPOILER ALERT: ^ Leaker right there.As per our agreement: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donald Sterling Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 rip Quote Genesis, best band NA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pfeiffer Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 I don't even know this Isolatar guy, but Pref bit down on that troll bait like it was his breakfast. Even I want to slap that guy now. 1 Quote ☾☆ Chairman Emeritus of Mensa HQ ☾☆ "It's not about the actual fish, themselves. Fish are not important in this context. It's about fish-ing, the act of fishing itself." -Jack O'Neill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefontaine Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 I don't even know this Isolatar guy, but Pref bit down on that troll bait like it was his breakfast. Even I want to slap that guy now. Sometimes you just need help passing the last 30 minutes of a shift. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atzuya Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Pre didn't bite the bait, he ran over it with a steamroller while revving a chainsaw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Armstrong Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 (edited) Sure, I was talking to you about Guardian but me complaining about how valid the cb is in this war could have been applied to anyone Isolatar, we have been hearing about and observing non-neutral activities that were being led and advocated for by Grillick for a long time. Do I need to remind anyone of the "Green Enforcement Agency" episode? http://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/4398-gpa-leaks/?p=63240 While the screenshots in that leak may have been manipulated there was clearly at least a kernel of truth there. When Grillick admitted to spy attacks and GPA began bulking up with thousands of tanks and missiles it became too much to ignore. Perhaps you are a person who looks out for others. I am that way too. I'm actually very nurturing. That being said: we are playing a game called Politics and War. If someone claims to be neutral and then they engage in war activities we have an obligation to call them on it and hold them accountable. Edited March 31, 2015 by Tim Armstrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jodo Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Neat. Who won? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefontaine Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Neat. Who won? Everyone who didn't fight, obviously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aisha Greyjoy Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Jodo won, of course. Quote Duke of House Greyjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 As I have said earlier, its just my opinion You can keep your opinion to yourself. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aksel Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 I look forward to these peace terms being met - and who the leaker truly is! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayayay Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Ugh, revealing the leaker? Shoulda held out another week, they mighta dropped that one Anyways Everyone who didn't fight, obviously.On behalf of "everyone," I shall accept the award for outstanding excellence in winning this war. Quote Orbis Wars | CSI: UPN | B I G O O F | PW Expert Has Nerve To Tell You How To Run Your Own Goddamn Alliance | Occupy Wall Street | Sheepy Sings TheNG - My favorite part is when Steve suggests DEIC might have done something remotely successful, then gets massively shit on for proposing such a stupid idea. On 1/4/2016 at 6:37 PM, Sheepy said: This was !@#$ing gold. 10/10 possibly my favorite post on these forums yet. Sheepy said: I'm retarded, you win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Jong-Il Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Oooo, a leaker? TEL would gladly take him in, as our second honerary leaker Quote The many forms of proof regarding Kastor's sexuality: - Kastor: I already came out the closet. - MaIone: I'm gay * MaIone is now known as Kastor - Henri: i'm a !@#$it Skable: the !@#$ is a codo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isolatar Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Sometimes you just need help passing the last 30 minutes of a shift. Anytime Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isolatar Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 (edited) Isolatar, we have been hearing about and observing non-neutral activities that were being led and advocated for by Grillick for a long time. Do I need to remind anyone of the "Green Enforcement Agency" episode? http://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/4398-gpa-leaks/?p=63240 While the screenshots in that leak may have been manipulated there was clearly at least a kernel of truth there. When Grillick admitted to spy attacks and GPA began bulking up with thousands of tanks and missiles it became too much to ignore. Perhaps you are a person who looks out for others. I am that way too. I'm actually very nurturing. That being said: we are playing a game called Politics and War. If someone claims to be neutral and then they engage in war activities we have an obligation to call them on it and hold them accountable. If I had known about this, I probably wouldn't have helped them save face. Edited March 31, 2015 by Isolatar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brooklyn666 Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Between WANA and this guy, the "Anti-War" crowd could use some new messengers. Nah, this is just the regular old peanut gallery. The usual gang of irrelevant people who desperatley want to parlay this conlict into a way for them to get a sliver of attention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenages Posted March 31, 2015 Author Share Posted March 31, 2015 (edited) Tenages, you've got mail. Also, I threw one last missile at your dragon friend, because I thought he'd feel left out if he didn't get one. I really wanted that missile for myself. I needed to eat another one to finally qualify for the SK Purple Heart medal. 4 years, 2 games, multiple wars, and I've never suffered enough damage in a war to get it Edited March 31, 2015 by Tenages Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George W. Bush Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Jokes on you, I'm already leaked the guy who leaked the leakers name. Quote You're no longer protecting the II? We have still teamed with II and TAC (and others) to rival The Covenants. This is getting complex. #FA_Problems Big problems for TSG. Really, not kidding. If Casey and Cyradis are King and Queen does that mean they're married? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 (edited) Is that kinda like how you're up VE's ass and won't do crap without them? Our peace terms have been known from pretty much the start and they practically mirror the rest of the coalitions terms. That's funny. Considering who that's coming from. Anyways. It's not like all of us got to get into a single war. I've been siting on the sidelines admiring the bombed wasteland that is GPA from the start. They've been handling their own surrender terms from the start, so guess that would make them automatons, not puppets to follow the idiotic train of thought you're on. But I guess that would go against the ignorant rhetoric the syndicate has mostly been spewing this war. Speaking of ignorant rhetoric; the pot meets the kettle at last. The Syndicate as an entity does not see this war in either a negative, or a positive light. If a few individual members within our enterprise feel the need to make their concerns known, it would be immoral and unethical to deny them their right to do so. Their "Rhetoric" as you call it, appears to be a mixture of legitimate concern and moralism, worded in a poor fashion. Not everyone within this world is adept at writing. You would do well to remember that. Your inability to address my member's concerns in any way whatsoever is only overshadowed by your complete and utter disregard for common decency. Your attempts at devolving the conversation into a chain of insults and ad hominems against a political entity which has been rather civil towards you and yours surprise me to say the least. (EDIT: typo) Edited March 31, 2015 by Partisan 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefontaine Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 (edited) political entity which has been rather civil towards you and yours. He said he didn't speak for tS. Thus I was not addressing tS. I don't need to merit factless opinions with responses of merit. If he was able to validate his opinion with evidence for it, I would have likely refuted his points. Edited March 31, 2015 by Prefontaine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 My point was in reference mostly to your reference of "the syndicate", as well as Ragnars baseless insult regarding our independence. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefontaine Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 (edited) My point was in reference mostly to your reference of "the syndicate", as well as Ragnars baseless insult regarding our independence. It's where most of the dissent has been coming from, is it not? Edit: Stupid auto-correct. Edited March 31, 2015 by Prefontaine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 You know well that this dissent stems from a select few - you addressed as much in your initial reply. perhaps you should either address the "dissent", as you call it, by properly expanding upon your reasoning, or alternatively,ignore it. One thing is for certain: calling out entire alliances over the opinion of a few is not going to do you any favors in terms of pr. At the very least it has not done so with me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefontaine Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 You know well that this dissent stems from a select few - you addressed as much in your initial reply. perhaps you should either address the "dissent", as you call it, by properly expanding upon your reasoning, or alternatively,ignore it. One thing is for certain: calling out entire alliances over the opinion of a few is not going to do you any favors in terms of pr. At the very least it has not done so with me. Yes. It comes from a select few, a select few members of the same alliance. I'm sorry you feel pointing out facts is bad PR. As for expanding upon my reason(s).. Why explain something to someone who's already made up their mind without having more than half the story? I wanted him to explain the reasons for his opinion, he seems to be refusing that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.