Jump to content

Democratic Vs Dictatorial Alliances


greatkitteh
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think an alliance that has a mix of the two work the best, but that involves a group of members that can be trusted.

 

You need a leader or two that steer the ship and can make split decisions in the face of danger. But you also need the grounds of loyalty and trust for those leaders to stand on, meaning it needs to not only feel like they're capable of filling that role but also the fact that if they should on day not they can be replaced.

 

I think it's important to have an alliance where anyone can voice their grievances and ask for a new leader, without being in the government or being the vice president.

 

Having a community like that takes time and risks that not everyone think is worth taking though.

It's my birthday today, and I'm 33!

That means only one thing...BRING IT IN, GUYS!

*every character from every game, comic, cartoon, TV show, movie, and book reality come in with everything for a HUGE party*

4nVL9WJ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I played in a few of democratic alliances and a lot of dictatorial alliances, I've seen democracies usually fall apart due to lack of trust between players from the same alliance (as they usually compete with each other most of the time) and I've seen some huge alliances succeed with pseudo-democratic government as well. I believe it has to do with the way democracy is constructed. A restricted democracy is always good in my opinion, but whatever the government type is, it is very important for the members to feel that the alliance is their own and not a property of the leader or a few people. The later will usually make people leave the alliance or stay there without loyalty to the alliance.

 

How welcoming an alliance is, depends on how active the community is, irrespective of whether it is a democracy or a dictatorship. And in alliances like Mensa, if their leader is asking for public opinion before taking important decisions and considers every point, then that serves the purpose of democracy.

 

I don't know how other democratic alliances here are designed, but in our alliance, democracy is restricted to only internal matters and not for foreign affairs and democracy is generally suspended during war period. Unlike popular notion regarding democracies, we can take decisions within 12-18 hours or so (depending on which time of the day it is).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your thread stopped making any sense the moment you called Arrgh a dictatorship. 

 

Members can by popular vote dismiss the grand admiral and then vote on who they want there. I don't know how it can get more democratic. Plus most of the important things concerning the alliance are put to vote and there's a lot of transparency on what's going on up top. 

 

Avoid passing statements when you've zero idea in reality. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that what your govs told you? Huh, good thing I left after the election then

No they did not. That's a ridiculous statement, honestly.

https://i.imgur.com/Jg0gWBo.mp4

 

You're actually reading this?

"Trade-ever trade and the increasing of their fortunes- seems to have occupied their minds above all else."[/center]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No they did not. That's a ridiculous statement, honestly.

Well, then where did you come up with your stupid assertion that she left when the going got tough. 

 

She stayed the entire war, and did a ton more damage and was far more effective than you were, despite being targeted as a good player. 

 

She only left after your recent elections, so if things are still 'rough,' that's all on you guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol Vanek, don't mind him and his cute assertion. It just strikes me as ironic that despite UPN members boast themselves being democratic alliance, a lot of their members are very close to being clueless about the internal happenings of their own alliance, and most of the time the biggest decisions were decided by only a handful of people without ever really consulting the rest of the alliance.

 

Really, I wonder which alliance is the true dictatorship here

UedhRvY.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, then where did you come up with your stupid assertion that she left when the going got tough. 

 

She stayed the entire war, and did a ton more damage and was far more effective than you were, despite being targeted as a good player. 

 

She only left after your recent elections, so if things are still 'rough,' that's all on you guys. 

Assertion? No, it was merely a question. 

 

I never denied her contribution during the war, I wasn't even referring to war. You did. 

 

Finally, I never said things were "still rough" and I definitely didn't say she was at fault for anything that occurred. That would be stupid of me to imply.

https://i.imgur.com/Jg0gWBo.mp4

 

You're actually reading this?

"Trade-ever trade and the increasing of their fortunes- seems to have occupied their minds above all else."[/center]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol Vanek, don't mind him and his cute assertion. It just strikes me as ironic that despite UPN members boast themselves being democratic alliance, a lot of their members are very close to being clueless about the internal happenings of their own alliance, and most of the time the biggest decisions were decided by only a handful of people without ever really consulting the rest of the alliance.

 

Really, I wonder which alliance is the true dictatorship here

What "cute assertion" did I make? I only asked a question and your comrade called it an assertion, so I guess that's what it stands to be now.

 

I'm not sure what's ironic about our alliance. How is it not a display of democracy being able to elect members to every government position available? It's not like we open up a few deputy positions and call it a day.

https://i.imgur.com/Jg0gWBo.mp4

 

You're actually reading this?

"Trade-ever trade and the increasing of their fortunes- seems to have occupied their minds above all else."[/center]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GPA!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

is a dictatorship

Edited by Prezyan

 

 

Psweet> pro-tip: don't listen to baronus if Prezyan disagrees with him

5:48 AM — +Eva-Beatrice sq**rts all over the walls

Eva-Beatrice> I'd let Sintiya conquer me anyday x)

10:56 PM — +Eva-Beatrice m*st*rb*tes in front of Prezyan

12:13 AM — +Eva-Beatrice has no one to !@#$ :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Democracies have always been overrated.

Says the fascist, so nothing new under the sun.

  • Upvote 1

It's my birthday today, and I'm 33!

That means only one thing...BRING IT IN, GUYS!

*every character from every game, comic, cartoon, TV show, movie, and book reality come in with everything for a HUGE party*

4nVL9WJ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So democracy is only a matter of ELECTION NOW COMRADE and everything else is superficial. Gotcha

I like how the same person who ran away at the alliance now complains about the alliance. Well done.

:sheepy:  :sheepy:  :sheepy:  :sheepy:               :sheepy:              :sheepy: :sheepy: :sheepy: :sheepy:


Greatkitteh was here.-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how the same person who ran away at the alliance now complains about the alliance. Well done.

Piss off. Atzuya helped UPN more in the Alpha than you have since you joined the game.

 

 

Annnnyways.

 

Democracies where everyone get's a say, like the ALC(which ceased to exist long ago), almost always fail. In fact, I can't think of a single alliance like that which has existed for any reasonable amount of time. Elections in the game are nearly always a popularity contest as well. Autocracies work well unless you have a supreme ruler where all decisions must go through them yet they are never active and don't want to let go of the reigns of power. Special note for Triumvirate governments which either end up with one of them taking over the government (ala GPA under Lambdadelta or Grillick) or in a situation where everything takes forever because none of them want to trample on each other to get done that which needs to be done.

 

However, above all, Autocracies work.

Edited by Metro
  • Upvote 1

Orbis Wars   |   CSI: UPN   |   B I G O O F   |   PW Expert Has Nerve To Tell You How To Run Your Own Goddamn Alliance | Occupy Wall Street | Sheepy Sings

TheNG - My favorite part is when Steve suggests DEIC might have done something remotely successful, then gets massively shit on for proposing such a stupid idea.

On 1/4/2016 at 6:37 PM, Sheepy said:
Sheepy said:

I'm retarded, you win

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So democracy is only a matter of ELECTION NOW COMRADE and everything else is superficial. Gotcha

I never said elections were the sole representation of a democracy, but it's definitely a key component of a democracy. I think it needs to be noted that UPN characterizes itself as a "semi-democracy." Just putting that out there. 

https://i.imgur.com/Jg0gWBo.mp4

 

You're actually reading this?

"Trade-ever trade and the increasing of their fortunes- seems to have occupied their minds above all else."[/center]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you on about mate, Rose is basically dictatorship under glorious Emperor Cailou. I mean the charter has democratic elements to it, but in practise these serve more as guidelines. The most obvious example is the charter states we must elect an Emperor, but in practise most of the Emperors have just been picked by the previous one, usually stepping up from the position of Regent. Cailou was elected, and Angelus might have been but I can't remember. Electing or Impeaching the Emperor is the only real democratic part of Rose, all power belongs to the Emperor, and the Lords Cabinet  through powers granted by the Emperor. 

For reference as Emperors we've had Pubstomper (Cailou I) -> Angelus -> Kurdnak -> Keegoz -- Election > Cailou II

 

The Emperor holds basically absolute power, but the system works because of the culture of Rose.

  • Upvote 1

As you sow, so shall you reap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm not sure what's ironic about our alliance. How is it not a display of democracy being able to elect members to every government position available? It's not like we open up a few deputy positions and call it a day.

 

So having elections to determine who gets a Gov position is a display of democracy?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well !@#$ me, Mensa is a dirty, goddam, Democratic Alliance!  I didn't sign up for this shit...

☾☆

Warrior of Dio

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.