Abbas Mehdi

Someone who eats crayons to stay fit.

Maybe you should eat crayons if it is not detrimental to your self. I am sure there are doctors that could prescribe it.

You are paying for both of our hospital bills.

Where is my treaty that Flubb will eventually cancel?

I did not know this thread was posted when I messaged you earlier but I am quite saddened to hear about this. I hope you feel welcome and can dm me always regardless of the fact that you are playing or not. Goodluck with this and I hope your abusers get reported. I do hope you return to the game sometime and have a much better outlook of it.

Come back or else.

I promise to return home tomorrow evening.

Alright guys lets hear him out. Maybe he is onto something here. What if we give every UN member veto powers?

That one hit right in the knee.

Now that's a name I haven't seen in quite some time. Hey there Bruce.

Considering we have enough money around and goodwill to help grow and support new communities like yours to transition into this game, I think we are doing impeccably well. But hey to each his own.

Mate why would I be banned lol. I am doing well. How are you?

I believe using real money to do anything ingame is a bannable offense. I think for 2 billion pw cash we can spy people for you. The money has to be in escrow first.

Asking for a friend here, how much did the members get paid for each spy op? Also can you connect us with people that pay for spy ops? As your ally it would really help us out in our rebuild if we can get paid to spy on Coalition A. Call me.

I am watching.

Don't know. He has recently become less raidy type. His flavour of the season right now is staying in rose.

Actually I have blocked ockey over 5 months ago. Sketchy has stopped talking to me and keegoz is no longer on speed dial. But I am still tight with DTC yes.

Good to see you can finally connect the treaty chains now Underlord. Took you 4 years.

The pleasure was all mine. And thanks for the pecs dude. Remember to never skip leg day boys and girls.

Sorry forgot to logout. So I was saying That was quite intentional and all part of a greater plan.

I am with sketchy on this. I have never encountered a person with such delusion so as to say bulbasar is better than charmander.

Congratz on the peace. Goodluck in rebuild. Couldn't ask for a better set of allies.

I think you are correct but this is an impossible effort to experiment. The unknowns at play and the sample size we have to generate is simple too vast of an effort. When the technology catches up in this regard then we can look more into it. I think we can agree to disagree here and go back to the drawing board and leave this one for the philosophers.

The larger and broader hypothesis are always broken down into smaller experiments for testing and replication. Based on a point provided by Noctis on the rejection of his application. If the same test is replicated in the syndicate with the outcome being positive, we can verify the hypothesis on the success of an alliance based on the test subject being in the alliance and its success being measured quantifiable. As for the metrics on measurement success, I am all ears for any input in that regard.

I think from the definition of quantifiable we can conclude that everything is quantifiable. Noctis point is understood by us and hence why we ask as a concerned party whether our error in judgement in rejecting his application was hypothetically replicated in another alliance such as the syndicate without the rejection then maybe we could answer the question on the success of an alliance and its relation to the value x which is defined as the membership of Noctis. Simply following the scientific process here.