kalev60 Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 (edited) www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhnPVP23rzo Edited March 25, 2015 by kalev60 Quote Charlie Chaplin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RagnarBuliwyf Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 You really should just let him go, tbh. Why? Why should a deserter be allowed to just "go"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kastor (Old Account) Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 Why? Why should a deserter be allowed to just "go"? I meant to go to The Zoo. Quote "That ain't Cologne, that's the smell of success." 17:00 <•Sheepy> I don't want you to leave the game 19:20 <•Pubstomber>: Man, I really wish Rose had allied BoC a couple months ago when we had the chance instead of picking Vanguard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RagnarBuliwyf Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 I meant to go to The Zoo. Let a round of war go on. They've yet to even get some serious damage, if they're crying about 1-2 days of war then they need to lose more pixels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 I approve! good work guys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malakai Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 (edited) I can definitely respect this, even though I'm actually facing you. The only thing I want to happen is for you to stop sending peace offers and actually, y'know, fight My nation is under air and naval blockades. My tanks have been weakened, my ability to purchase the supplies I need cut off. I won't blindly attack for the sake of your ego or to increase my casualty rate. Defense is the logical choice. Peace is offered daily to all I'm in conflict with for I bear no ill will for any of you. Want to continue the aggression? Come at me bro. Edited March 25, 2015 by CzarOptima Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ELPINCHAZO Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 My nation is under air and naval blockades. My tanks have been weakened, my ability to purchase the supplies I need cut off. I won't blindly attack for the sake of your ego or to increase my casualty rate. Defense is the logical choice. Peace is offered daily to all I'm in conflict with for I bear no ill will for any of you. Want to continue the aggression? Come at me bro. Wow, I love the defiant punctuation to a long winded whine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malakai Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 Wow, I love the defiant punctuation to a long winded whine. Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ELPINCHAZO Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 Thanks! I'm also a fan of sarcasm and a practitioner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grillick Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 I'm also a fan of sarcasm and a practitioner.I don't think anyone noticed. 1 Quote "It's hard to be a team player when you're omnipotent." - Q Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hereno Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 this war just continues to make the aggressors look shittier and shittier while providing no actual strategic gains Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 this war just continues to make the aggressors look shittier and shittier while providing no actual strategic gains What is an example of a "strategic gain" gained from war? Quote ~ " Fighting through the Storm " ~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jodo Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 What is an example of a "strategic gain" gained from war?Months of delicious eye nectar harvests, judging by his angsty comment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoS Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 this war just continues to make the aggressors look shittier and shittier while providing no actual strategic gains How would you know a strategic gain, having never had any? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 I know even I don't think its justified and I could be kicked out for this reason... I thinks its a false war and I have broken the rules and beiged some opponents ad fast as possible... It has made me rethink what I am doing... the DoW was a farce to cover up the fact they wanted GPA to be taken down a peg or two (My opinion) I cannot and will not declare on a anymore Neutral people protecting them selves.. i have to finish my part in the war.. I know the N7O role in this was purely voluntary I as the 1 of the vanguards could not say no to joining the war. Major respect for the people who were strong enough to say no... to any from the ESA who dislike my views here sorry. I accept any and all consequences to my actions and or words NO argument War for the sake of boredom Is just plain wrong While yes it can be said that one way or another an attack would happen (you can actually say this for most conflicts), the fact of the matter is Grillick has massive heel heat and yet continued to be leader of an alliance that proclaims itself to be the biggest faces on the roster. Grillick's continued membership was polled and it failed so he continued, I directly removed him and the people rallied around him calling me a traitor for daring to remove that "cancer" to the alliance so again he continued... as far as I'm concerned the GPA's viewpoints are aligned with Grillick considering they have supported him time and time again. Grillick is a known individual who has committed aggressive acts, a liar for actually not having done the acts he claims to be responsible for, and a terrible representative for his type of alliance who has outright threatened others both in and outside the alliance... simply put ridding GPA of Grillick's influence is a fine enough cause. However that isn't to say Grillick was the only negative force... he is simply the only one left after the rest ran off. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valakias Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 While yes it can be said that one way or another an attack would happen (you can actually say this for most conflicts), the fact of the matter is Grillick has massive heel heat and yet continued to be leader of an alliance that proclaims itself to be the biggest faces on the roster. Grillick's continued membership was polled and it failed so he continued, I directly removed him and the people rallied around him calling me a traitor for daring to remove that "cancer" to the alliance so again he continued... as far as I'm concerned the GPA's viewpoints are aligned with Grillick considering they have supported him time and time again. Grillick is a known individual who has committed aggressive acts, a liar for actually not having done the acts he claims to be responsible for, and a terrible representative for his type of alliance who has outright threatened others both in and outside the alliance... simply put ridding GPA of Grillick's influence is a fine enough cause. However that isn't to say Grillick was the only negative force... he is simply the only one left after the rest ran off. Your Grillobsession is getting worst by the day i see 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apeman Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 However that isn't to say Grillick was the only negative force... he is simply the only one left after the rest ran off. Oh who could you be talking about? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 Your Grillobsession is getting worst by the day i see Trust me when I say no one who actually knows me would say that (I'd thought you'd know better here). It can be likened to that with someone else based on our mutual hatred of each other... but that isn't Grillick. I don't even particularly dislike Grillick... he just isn't very good in the leader role especially with all that heat he has on him. Heat that he could have tried to do something about and chose not to. However that isn't to say Grillick was the only negative force... he is simply the only one left after the rest ran off. Oh who could you be talking about? Look in Rose. Not all of course but there you go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 Trust me when I say no one who actually knows me would say that (I'd thought you'd know better here). It can be likened to that with someone else based on our mutual hatred of each other... but that isn't Grillick. I don't even particularly dislike Grillick... he just isn't very good in the leader role especially with all that heat he has on him. Heat that he could have tried to do something about and chose not to. Look in Rose. Not all of course but there you go. Are you referring to Belisarius? Quote ~ " Fighting through the Storm " ~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Are you referring to Belisarius? I do not need to confirm that so I won't. I do not wish to imply there was a mere one other as that would be unfair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grillick Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 The most glaring example is just above this post. 1 Quote "It's hard to be a team player when you're omnipotent." - Q Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 The most glaring example is just above this post. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLekt6fGous A couple of issues. First I didn't run as I was forced out regardless of what you say on the matter, nor did any of the issues I had concern people outside the alliance like most others... secondly you're confirming by extension that I am correct in what I'm saying about others which I'd have thought to be something you'd not want to do... and thirdly I hope this doesn't wear you out completely. I mean you were already worn down before this all popped off so I hope you're doing fine, you've seemed more dejected than usual is all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedPhx Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 I never failed as a leader. People supported Grillick over me getting a new government (hopefully with good guys like Richard) done. The same Grillick who puts certain matters over his own alliance... that is a failure of a leader. Whatever you think of me I did it for the alliance but it really matters little what I say to you. Nice to see don't let these guys bother you. There is no wrong in admitting you were rude and apologizing. As someone who voted for you when you ran IA I liked the idea of "Soft Diplomacy" as opposed to not having any friends at all but had you not left after a couple days of your leadership I would have voted for impeachment with less thought than I put into who to vote for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 As someone who voted for you when you ran IA I liked the idea of "Soft Diplomacy" as opposed to not having any friends at all but had you not left after a couple days of your leadership I would have voted for impeachment with less thought than I put into who to vote for. I was totally correct though wasn't I? I was heavy handed admittedly, but when you have a for the sake of it stonewall like Grillick in the way at times of urgency you do what you have to (you think I could FA? To Grillick when a Triumvir leaves office that "domain" halts to a complete stop, he'd have impeached on that alone had I "overstepped"). He was long overdue for removal but clearly others didn't think so... or to be more accurate the whole removing an elected member meant people naturally took his side completely forgetting how terrible Grillick actually was. By the way good job on calling when the war would happen as you got out just in time to the point you couldn't even be said to have fled due to the coming war... you were obviously incorrect in the call that it'd 3 alliances but we can overlook that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seryozha Nikanor Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Color bomb yellow really? Thanks for that... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.