Jump to content

Rygus

Members
  • Posts

    77
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rygus

  1. How about, no and no?
  2. I wish i was in range of you to I could punish you myself for this supreme click bait.
  3. Rygus

    The Future

    KT is already way ahead of you, princess.
  4. Aye, it gave birth the best MilCom in the history of Orbis. First to 100+ bln net damage in a single war by an AA, and still maintaining the military prowess today even as our numbers dwindled. Thanks for the sacrifice bruv. Reducing the old growth to ashes gave birth to new life. o7
  5. Rygus

    Wiki Bias

    It's locked and now under the jurisdiction of the moderators.
  6. "He was doxxed by Col. A members" Yeah, who?
  7. "Good faith negotiating is absolutely necessary" - right after
  8. I've been a member of KT for two and a half years, and adjutant for ET and KT for 10 months in that period of time, and I have no idea what you're talking about. No doubt you got that sort of overblown and hyperbolic accusations from people like kosmo and Queen M (and the entirety of TRF for that matter), who used such rhetoric to tarnish the reputation of KT. Considering at one point our entire IA was run by Haydon, I think your understanding of how KT works is quite limited, as well as the knowledge of our past governments. Let me break it down for you if the past two wars with you and the wars recently weren't clear enough: KT does not give a flying pixel who you are, where you're from, what you believe. The only thing KT cares about is burning pixels, making war and good memes. It quite literally says this in our alliance description. "If you are unwilling or unprepared to shed blood for your fellow knights at any given moment, do not apply. If you are not active enough and do not use Discord, do not apply. If your meme energy is low, do not apply."
  9. Yeah, it was a classic case of a last second move against a supposedly non-existent IQsphere. Not sure why people keep asserting that TKR and KT are "cozying" up in any way, regarding each other as mutuals in war is not a "friendship", it's simply basic respect. "The content they support is simply not anything that TKR or any upstanding member of said alliance would support." What content would that be? Not sure what exactly you're implying here.
  10. That'll be 15 shekels as copyright payment. ?
  11. My point exactly. Coal. A needs to give something (i.e. defeat/surrender, doesn't matter what you call it) just to get more terms imposed. It's not gonna happen until Coal. B tells Coal. A these terms beforehand. All it takes is a "If you admit defeat/surrender here's the terms we propose that you guys fulfill as your commitment to peace." It's really simple. I stand with KT no matter what the Triumvirate decides or negotiates, I've munched enough steel and stolen enough goodies this war to last a normal P&W nation's lifetime.
  12. I don't find "surrender first and find out" reasonable at all to be fair. I imagine many alliances aren't so underhanded to circumvent these "non-negotiable terms" that supposedly "prove [our] commitment to peace." After all, wouldn't circumventing these terms be a sign that we aren't committed to peace?
  13. Pasky essentially summed this up for us. It's like being forced to sign page 1 of a contract and not being able to see the rest of it until we do so, and since we have very little incentive to sign for peace right now, it's not going to happen anytime soon. Candy is right in pointing out that guys lack of loot taking by the way, their situation is in no way indicative of what they claim. I think many people seem to be putting the cart before the horse here. The reason we don't want to sign for peace is because of Coal B.'s lack in giving terms that apply after a potential surrender, on top of the fact we're still dealing plenty of damage. Our situation is enough to satisfy plenty of our members into staying in this war. Simply saying: "why bother giving terms if they wont accept them anyways?" is a defeatist attitude and in no way a position a "winning side" should be taking. If Coal. B is so confident in their victory, why don't they keep pursuing terms on a regular basis instead of waiting months? Why not list a set of terms in tandem with a surrender? Why not find common ground? Truth is Coal. B simply doesn't want to find common ground. They don't want peace, and if they don't want peace, neither do we.
  14. Someone nuke him for suggesting such an outrageous agreement.
  15. First, how long do I think will it go on for? For the foreseeable future. I'm not saying in two months, nor three, but possibly even longer in 4-5 months time or more. The longer this goes on the more grounded everyone seems to be in their side, as shown by the forums themselves. Will it be eternal? No, it will end one day, just not any day I can realistically see, at least for now. Can this be sustained? Sure, Politics & War will go on with or without The Dial Up War happening in the background or the forefront, it's simply a matter of what's going to happen next while this war continues. Is that what the people want? I'd say the poll so far has shown that people do want this to continue, whether or not this changes only time will tell. The entire issue with this is that most people can get a good idea of how the peace talks are going (i.e. they're not going anywhere) but they have no direct outlet to view or listen to these talks. We have many claims here, and I'd like to see or hear the conversations going on both sides to either further verify what I (and others) have speculated or to perhaps expand on what we already know. The forums are 95% shit flinging and 5% actual substance when it comes to the complete truth at this stage. But how long do I want it to go on for? I want it to go as long as possible without getting boring. I'm still able to log in everyday and burn or steal pixels, so therefore I'm quite satisfied as this stage with my production at least, but I doubt this entertainment will last forever, but then again it's what? 3-4 months in and I'm still getting loot. So maybe the outlook isn't so bad.
  16. A PSA for the Proles of The Inquisition: KERTCHOGG is at fault for starting a war they didn't even know they were starting until war plans were leaked from the Totally-Disbanded-Former-IQsphere stating that said Totally-Disbanded-Former-IQsphere alliances had war plans to preemptively hit KERTCHOGG on the grounds of "assertive and aggressive rhetoric" because Big Brother Roq and friends intuition is never wrong. Besides, the Totally-Disbanded-Former-IQsphere has always been at war with KERTCHOGG. Surfs Up was seemingly all a ploy to lower infra in order to hit Totally-Disbanded-Former-IQsphere alliances. Then KERTCHOGG hatched their super secret, tyrannical, green hippo driven plan and preemptively hit the completely innocent Totally-Disbanded-Former-IQsphere member BK in order to get total hegemony over the most powerful alliances in the game. Then Big Brave NPO stepped in like the good white knights they are and won a "total victory" over the collective evil green hippo horde, bad orange man, and bad KT man. If you believe in anything else you're whale defending, pixel-hugging, upper-tier consolidating, green hippo smelling player who hates smiles, puppies, and engaging game dynamics and should submit in a total defeat to the Totally-Disbanded-Former-IQsphere immediately. This is been a message from your friends at the Totally-Disbanded-Former-IQsphere Department of Truth. And Remember Kids: Big Brother is Watching
  17. Yoda was a Penitus Oculatus spy all along Mission Accomplished
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.